| Literature DB >> 25709515 |
Rui Zeng1, Rong-Zheng Yue2, Chun-Yu Tan3, Qin Wang4, Pu Kuang5, Pan-Wen Tian6, Chuan Zuo3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interpreting an electrocardiogram (ECG) is not only one of the most important parts of diagnostics but also one of the most difficult areas to teach. Owing to the abstract nature of the basic theoretical knowledge of the ECG, its scattered characteristics, and tedious and difficult-to-remember subject matter, teaching how to interpret ECGs is as difficult for teachers to teach as it is for students to learn. In order to enable medical students to master basic knowledge of ECG interpretation skills in a limited teaching time, we modified the content used for traditional ECG teaching and now propose a new ECG teaching method called the "graphics-sequence memory method."Entities:
Keywords: ECG; classroom teaching content; graphics-sequence memory; new ideas
Year: 2015 PMID: 25709515 PMCID: PMC4329996 DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S75316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract ISSN: 1179-7258
Figure 1Schematic diagram of atrial premature beats with conduction of interior differences.
Figure 2Schematic diagrams of atrioventricular block (AVB).
Figure 3Analysis diagram of electrocardiogram (ECG) by graphics-sequence memory method.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) content analysis by graphics-sequence memory method
| Analysis content | Normal | Abnormal |
|---|---|---|
| Heart rate | 60–100 per minute | <60 per minute |
| Heart rhythm | Regular | Irregular |
| P wave | Sinus P wave | Non-sinus P wave |
| PR interval period | 0.12–0.20 seconds | <0.12 seconds |
| QRS wave | Normal | Abnormal voltage |
| QRS wave | Abnormal electric axis QRS duration augmentation Pathological Q wave | |
| ST segment | Normal ST segment | Elevation and depression of ST segment |
| T wave | Normal T wave | Tip, flat, or inverted T wave |
| Other issues | U wave | |
| Abnormal electrolyte-related ECG | ||
| Drug-related ECG |
Baseline situation of students between two groups
| Variables | Experiment group | Control group | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex composition (male/female) | 59/41 | 57/43 | 1.19 | 0.28 |
| Age (years) | 21.47±1.43 | 21.33±2.07 | 0.77 | 0.41 |
| Humanities module | 83.23±2.20 | 83.56±2.52 | −0.62 | 0.54 |
| Body morphology module | 80.19±6.45 | 80.15±7.31 | 0.02 | 0.98 |
| Physiology | 77.63±7.59 | 76.52±8.47 | 0.62 | 0.54 |
| Pathophysiology | 88.58±6.30 | 86.69±7.88 | 1.20 | 0.24 |
| Pathology | 80.5±5.20 | 81.33±5.60 | −0.70 | 0.49 |
Note:
Compared with the control group. Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation.
Figure 4Average electrocardiogram (ECG) reading time and accuracy achieved by traditional teaching group and innovative teaching group.
Note: *P<0.05 compared with traditional teaching group.