Literature DB >> 15592599

Computer simulations improve university instructional laboratories.

Nicola J Gibbons1, Chris Evans, Annette Payne, Kavita Shah, Darren K Griffin.   

Abstract

Laboratory classes are commonplace and essential in biology departments but can sometimes be cumbersome, unreliable, and a drain on time and resources. As university intakes increase, pressure on budgets and staff time can often lead to reduction in practical class provision. Frequently, the ability to use laboratory equipment, mix solutions, and manipulate test animals are essential learning outcomes, and "wet" laboratory classes are thus appropriate. In others, however, interpretation and manipulation of the data are the primary learning outcomes, and here, computer-based simulations can provide a cheaper, easier, and less time- and labor-intensive alternative. We report the evaluation of two computer-based simulations of practical exercises: the first in chromosome analysis, the second in bioinformatics. Simulations can provide significant time savings to students (by a factor of four in our first case study) without affecting learning, as measured by performance in assessment. Moreover, under certain circumstances, performance can be improved by the use of simulations (by 7% in our second case study). We concluded that the introduction of these simulations can significantly enhance student learning where consideration of the learning outcomes indicates that it might be appropriate. In addition, they can offer significant benefits to teaching staff.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15592599      PMCID: PMC533130          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.04-06-0040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Biol Educ        ISSN: 1536-7509


  4 in total

1.  Learning to karyotype in the university environment: a computer-based virtual laboratory class (KaryoLab) designed to rationalize time for the tutor/researcher and to encourage more students to engage in cytogenetics.

Authors:  N J Gibbons; C Evans; D K Griffin
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Can technology replace live preparations in student laboratories?

Authors:  H I Modell
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1989-06

3.  Comparison of a computer simulation program and a traditional laboratory practical class for teaching the principles of intestinal absorption.

Authors:  D G Dewhurst; J Hardcastle; P T Hardcastle; E Stuart
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-12

4.  Paris Conference (1971): standardization in human cytogenetics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1972
  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  How effective are simulated molecular-level experiments for teaching diffusion and osmosis?

Authors:  Eli Meir; Judith Perry; Derek Stal; Susan Maruca; Eric Klopfer
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

2.  Evaluation of a web-based ECG-interpretation programme for undergraduate medical students.

Authors:  Mikael Nilsson; Gunilla Bolinder; Claes Held; Bo-Lennart Johansson; Uno Fors; Jan Ostergren
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  New ideas for teaching electrocardiogram interpretation and improving classroom teaching content.

Authors:  Rui Zeng; Rong-Zheng Yue; Chun-Yu Tan; Qin Wang; Pu Kuang; Pan-Wen Tian; Chuan Zuo
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2015-02-10

4.  Encouragement for Faculty to Implement Vision and Change.

Authors:  Caylyn Harvey; Kristen Eshleman; Kyosung Koo; Kevin G Smith; Christopher J Paradise; A Malcolm Campbell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Students' Knowledge Comprehension after Implementation of Live Conventional Demonstration, Video Teaching and Video-Assisted Instruction Methods in Endodontic Practice.

Authors:  Nahid Mohammadzadeh Akhlaghi; Zohreh Khalilak; Mehdi Vatanpour; Amirabbas Moshari; Saman Ghaffari; Mohammad Sadegh Namazikhah
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2017

6.  "Designer babies?!" A CRISPR-based learning module for undergraduates built around the CCR5 gene.

Authors:  Jay N Pieczynski; Hooi Lynn Kee
Journal:  Biochem Mol Biol Educ       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 1.160

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.