Literature DB >> 25708271

Diagnosis of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis by means of elemental bioimaging and speciation analysis.

Marvin Birka1, Kristina S Wentker1, Elke Lusmöller2, Brigit Arheilger2, Christoph A Wehe1, Michael Sperling1,3, Rudolf Stadler2, Uwe Karst1.   

Abstract

The combined use of elemental bioimaging and speciation analysis is presented as a novel means for the diagnosis of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), a rare disease occurring after administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in skin samples of patients suffering from renal insufficiency. As the pathogenesis of NSF is still largely unknown particularly with regard to the distribution and potential retention of gadolinium in the human organism, a skin biopsy sample from a suspected NSF patient was investigated. The combination of inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), laser ablation (LA) ICP-MS for quantitative elemental bioimaging, and hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) ICP-MS for speciation analysis allowed one to unambiguously diagnose the patient as a case of NSF. By means of ICP-MS, a total gadolinium concentration from 3.02 to 4.58 mg/kg was determined in the biopsy sample, indicating a considerable deposition of gadolinium in the patient's skin. LA-ICP-MS revealed a distinctly inhomogeneous distribution of gadolinium as well as concentrations of up to 400 mg/kg in individual sections of the skin biopsy. Furthermore, the correlation between the distributions of phosphorus and gadolinium suggests the presence of GdPO4 deposits in the tissue section. Speciation analysis by means of HILIC-ICP-MS showed the presence of the intact GBCA Gd-HP-DO3A eight years after the administration to the patient. The concentration of the contrast agent in the aqueous extract of the skin biopsy was found to be 1.76 nmol/L. Moreover, evidence for the presence of further highly polar gadolinium species in low concentrations was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25708271     DOI: 10.1021/ac504488k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  31 in total

Review 1.  The biological fate of gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents: a call to action for bioinorganic chemists.

Authors:  Mariane Le Fur; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Metallomics       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.526

Review 2.  Gadolinium-based contrast agents: did we miss something in the last 25 years?

Authors:  Bruno Beomonte Zobel; Carlo Cosimo Quattrocchi; Yuri Errante; Rosario Francesco Grasso
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-12-26       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Removal of gadolinium-based contrast agents: adsorption on activated carbon.

Authors:  María P Elizalde-González; Esmeralda García-Díaz; Mario González-Perea; Jürgen Mattusch
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Brain tissue gadolinium retention in pediatric patients after contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance exams: pathological confirmation.

Authors:  A Luana Stanescu; Dennis W Shaw; Nozomu Murata; Kiyoko Murata; Joe C Rutledge; Ezekiel Maloney; Kenneth R Maravilla
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-01-27

Review 5.  Gadolinium retention in the body: what we know and what we can do.

Authors:  Enrico Tedeschi; Ferdinando Caranci; Flavio Giordano; Valentina Angelini; Sirio Cocozza; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.469

6.  In vivo dentate nucleus MRI relaxometry correlates with previous administration of Gadolinium-based contrast agents.

Authors:  Enrico Tedeschi; Giuseppe Palma; Antonietta Canna; Sirio Cocozza; Carmela Russo; Pasquale Borrelli; Roberta Lanzillo; Valentina Angelini; Emanuela Postiglione; Vincenzo Brescia Morra; Marco Salvatore; Arturo Brunetti; Mario Quarantelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Super-Resolution Reconstruction for Two- and Three-Dimensional LA-ICP-MS Bioimaging.

Authors:  Mika T Westerhausen; David P Bishop; Annette Dowd; Jonathan Wanagat; Nerida Cole; Philip A Doble
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 8.  Biological effects of MRI contrast agents: gadolinium retention, potential mechanisms and a role for phosphorus.

Authors:  Joel Garcia; Stephen Z Liu; Angelique Y Louie
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers.

Authors:  Jessica Wahsner; Eric M Gale; Aurora Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 10.  T1 hyperintensity on brain imaging subsequent to gadolinium-based contrast agent administration: what do we know about intracranial gadolinium deposition?

Authors:  Nigel Hoggard; Giles H Roditi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.