Rudy S Suidan1, Pedro T Ramirez2, Debra M Sarasohn3, Jerrold B Teitcher3, Svetlana Mironov3, Revathy B Iyer4, Qin Zhou5, Alexia Iasonos5, Harold Paul1, Masayoshi Hosaka2, Carol A Aghajanian6, Mario M Leitao7, Ginger J Gardner7, Nadeem R Abu-Rustum7, Yukio Sonoda7, Douglas A Levine7, Hedvig Hricak3, Dennis S Chi8. 1. Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY, USA. 2. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Houston, TX, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, MSKCC, New York, NY, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, MDACC, Houston, TX, USA. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, MSKCC, New York, NY, USA. 6. Gynecologic Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, MSKCC, New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 7. Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. 8. Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), New York, NY, USA; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: gynbreast@mskcc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen/pelvis and serum CA-125 to predict suboptimal (>1cm residual disease) primary cytoreduction in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter trial of patients who underwent primary cytoreduction for stage III-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. A CT scan of the abdomen/pelvis and serum CA-125 were obtained within 35 and 14 days before surgery, respectively. Four clinical and 20 radiologic criteria were assessed. RESULTS: From 7/2001 to 12/2012, 669 patients were enrolled; 350 met eligibility criteria. The optimal debulking rate was 75%. On multivariate analysis, three clinical and six radiologic criteria were significantly associated with suboptimal debulking: age ≥ 60 years (p=0.01); CA-125 ≥ 500 U/mL (p<0.001); ASA 3-4 (p<0.001); suprarenal retroperitoneal lymph nodes >1cm (p<0.001); diffuse small bowel adhesions/thickening (p<0.001); and lesions >1cm in the small bowel mesentery (p=0.03), root of the superior mesenteric artery (p=0.003), perisplenic area (p<0.001), and lesser sac (p<0.001). A 'predictive value score' was assigned for each criterion, and the suboptimal debulking rates of patients who had a total score of 0, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and ≥ 9 were 5%, 10%, 17%, 34%, 52%, and 74%, respectively. A prognostic model combining these nine factors had a predictive accuracy of 0.758. CONCLUSIONS: We identified nine criteria associated with suboptimal cytoreduction, and developed a predictive model in which the suboptimal rate was directly proportional to a predictive value score. These results may be helpful in pretreatment patient assessment.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the ability of preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen/pelvis and serum CA-125 to predict suboptimal (>1cm residual disease) primary cytoreduction in advanced ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter trial of patients who underwent primary cytoreduction for stage III-IV ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer. A CT scan of the abdomen/pelvis and serum CA-125 were obtained within 35 and 14 days before surgery, respectively. Four clinical and 20 radiologic criteria were assessed. RESULTS: From 7/2001 to 12/2012, 669 patients were enrolled; 350 met eligibility criteria. The optimal debulking rate was 75%. On multivariate analysis, three clinical and six radiologic criteria were significantly associated with suboptimal debulking: age ≥ 60 years (p=0.01); CA-125 ≥ 500 U/mL (p<0.001); ASA 3-4 (p<0.001); suprarenal retroperitoneal lymph nodes >1cm (p<0.001); diffuse small bowel adhesions/thickening (p<0.001); and lesions >1cm in the small bowel mesentery (p=0.03), root of the superior mesenteric artery (p=0.003), perisplenic area (p<0.001), and lesser sac (p<0.001). A 'predictive value score' was assigned for each criterion, and the suboptimal debulking rates of patients who had a total score of 0, 1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7-8, and ≥ 9 were 5%, 10%, 17%, 34%, 52%, and 74%, respectively. A prognostic model combining these nine factors had a predictive accuracy of 0.758. CONCLUSIONS: We identified nine criteria associated with suboptimal cytoreduction, and developed a predictive model in which the suboptimal rate was directly proportional to a predictive value score. These results may be helpful in pretreatment patient assessment.
Authors: Deborah K Armstrong; Brian Bundy; Lari Wenzel; Helen Q Huang; Rebecca Baergen; Shashikant Lele; Larry J Copeland; Joan L Walker; Robert A Burger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-01-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: O Gemer; M Lurian; M Gdalevich; V Kapustian; E Piura; D Schneider; O Lavie; T Levy; A Fishman; R Dgani; H Levavi; U Beller Journal: Eur J Surg Oncol Date: 2005-07-07 Impact factor: 4.424
Authors: Robert E Bristow; Rafael S Tomacruz; Deborah K Armstrong; Edward L Trimble; F J Montz Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Robert F Ozols; Brian N Bundy; Benjamin E Greer; Jeffrey M Fowler; Daniel Clarke-Pearson; Robert A Burger; Robert S Mannel; Koen DeGeest; Ellen M Hartenbach; Rebecca Baergen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-14 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W J Hoskins; W P McGuire; M F Brady; H D Homesley; W T Creasman; M Berman; H Ball; J S Berek Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 1994-04 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Scott M Eisenkop; Nick M Spirtos; Richard L Friedman; Wei-Chien Michael Lin; Albert L Pisani; Sergio Perticucci Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Sonali Patankar; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Yongmei Huang; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Neil S Horowitz; G Larry Maxwell; Austin Miller; Chad A Hamilton; Bunja Rungruang; Noah Rodriguez; Scott D Richard; Thomas C Krivak; Jeffrey M Fowler; David G Mutch; Linda Van Le; Roger B Lee; Peter Argenta; David Bender; Krishnansu S Tewari; David Gershenson; James J Java; Michael A Bookman Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2017-11-23 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Natalia Rodriguez Gómez-Hidalgo; Bertha Alejandra Martinez-Cannon; Alpa M Nick; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood; Robert L Coleman; Pedro T Ramirez Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Nicole D Fleming; Alpa M Nick; Robert L Coleman; Shannon N Westin; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman; Bryan Fellman; Larissa A Meyer; Kathleen M Schmeler; Karen H Lu; Anil K Sood Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Sukhmani K Padda; Donato Terrone; Lu Tian; Amanda Khuong; Joel W Neal; Jonathan W Riess; Mark F Berry; Chuong D Hoang; Bryan M Burt; Ann N Leung; Erich J Schwartz; Joseph B Shrager; Heather A Wakelee Journal: J Thorac Imaging Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 3.000