Literature DB >> 25698113

Bidirectional but asymmetrical sexual hybridization between Brassica carinata and Sinapis arvensis (Brassicaceae).

Kyle W Cheung1, Fakhria M Razeq, Connie A Sauder, Tracey James, Sara L Martin.   

Abstract

With transgenic crop development it is important to evaluate the potential for transgenes to escape into populations of wild, weedy relatives. Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata, BBCC) is easily transformed and is being investigated for uses from biodiesel fuels to biopharmaceuticals. However, little work has been done evaluating its ability to cross with relatives such as wild mustard (Sinapsis arvensis, SrSr), an abundant, cosmopolitan weedy relative. Here we conducted bidirectional crosses with Ethiopian mustard as a maternal parent in 997 crosses and paternal parent in 1,109 crosses. Hybrids were confirmed using flow cytometry and species-specific ITS molecular markers and indicate a high hybridization rate of 6.43 % between Ethiopian mustard (♀) and wild mustard (♂) and a lower, but not insignificant, hybridization rate of 0.01 % in the reverse direction. The majority of the hybrids were homoploid (BCSr) with less than 1 % of pollen production of their parents and low seed production (0.26 seeds/pollination) in crosses and backcrosses indicating a potential for advanced generation hybrids. The accession used had a significant effect on hybrid seed production with different accessions of Ethopian mustard varying in their production of hybrid offspring from 2.69 to 16.34 % and one accession of wild mustard siring almost twice as many hybrid offspring per flower as the other. One pentaploid (BBCCSr) and one hexaploid (BBCCSrSr) hybrid were produced and had higher pollen viability, though no and low seed production, respectively. As wild mustard is self-incompatible and the outcrossing rate of Ethiopian mustard has been estimated as 30 % potential for hybrid production in the wild appears to be high, though the hybridization rate found here represents a worst case scenario as it does not incorporate pre-pollination barriers. Hybridization in the wild needs to be directly evaluated as does the propensity of Ethiopian mustard to volunteer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698113     DOI: 10.1007/s10265-015-0702-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plant Res        ISSN: 0918-9440            Impact factor:   2.629


  14 in total

Review 1.  Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives.

Authors:  C Neal Stewart; Matthew D Halfhill; Suzanne I Warwick
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size.

Authors:  Jaroslav Dolezel; Jan Bartos
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 3.  Risks and consequences of gene flow from herbicide-resistant crops: canola (Brassica napus L) as a case study.

Authors:  Anne Légère
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.845

4.  Transgene escape: what potential for crop-wild hybridization?

Authors:  T T Armstrong; R G Fitzjohn; L E Newstrom; A D Wilton; W G Lee
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  A tiered system for assessing the risk of genetically modified plants to non-target organisms.

Authors:  Monica Garcia-Alonso; Erik Jacobs; Alan Raybould; Thomas E Nickson; Peter Sowig; Hilde Willekens; Pier Van der Kouwe; Raymond Layton; Firoz Amijee; Angel M Fuentes; Francesca Tencalla
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2007-03-01

Review 6.  Crop-to-wild gene flow, introgression and possible fitness effects of transgenes.

Authors:  Eric Jenczewski; Joëlle Ronfort; Anne-Marie Chèvre
Journal:  Environ Biosafety Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar

7.  Environmental variation for outcrossing rate in rapeseed (Brassica napus).

Authors:  H C Becker; C Damgaard; B Karlsson
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 8.  Gene flow, invasiveness, and ecological impact of genetically modified crops.

Authors:  Suzanne I Warwick; Hugh J Beckie; Linda M Hall
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 9.  Transgene introgression in crop relatives: molecular evidence and mitigation strategies.

Authors:  Charles Kwit; Hong S Moon; Suzanne I Warwick; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 19.536

10.  Pollen-mediated gene flow in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.): can genetically engineered and organic flax coexist?

Authors:  A J Jhala; H Bhatt; K Topinka; L M Hall
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.821

View more
  1 in total

1.  Narrow genetic base shapes population structure and linkage disequilibrium in an industrial oilseed crop, Brassica carinata A. Braun.

Authors:  Yogendra Khedikar; Wayne E Clarke; Lifeng Chen; Erin E Higgins; Sateesh Kagale; Chu Shin Koh; Rick Bennett; Isobel A P Parkin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.996

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.