Literature DB >> 14526376

Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives.

C Neal Stewart1, Matthew D Halfhill, Suzanne I Warwick.   

Abstract

Transgenes engineered into annual crops could be unintentionally introduced into the genomes of their free-living wild relatives. The fear is that these transgenes might persist in the environment and have negative ecological consequences. Are some crops or transgenic traits of more concern than others? Are there natural genetic barriers to minimize gene escape? Can the genetic transformation process be exploited to produce new barriers to gene flow? Questions abound, but luckily so do answers.

Keywords:  Non-programmatic

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14526376     DOI： 10.1038/nrg1179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Genet        ISSN： 1471-0056            Impact factor:   53.242


  82 in total

1.  Hybridization between crops and wild relatives: the contribution of cultivated lettuce to the vigour of crop-wild hybrids under drought, salinity and nutrient deficiency conditions.

Authors:  Brigitte Uwimana; Marinus J M Smulders; Danny A P Hooftman; Yorike Hartman; Peter H van Tienderen; Johannes Jansen; Leah K McHale; Richard W Michelmore; Clemens C M van de Wiel; Richard G F Visser
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  Introgression from cultivated rice influences genetic differentiation of weedy rice populations at a local spatial scale.

Authors:  Zhuxi Jiang; Hanbing Xia; Barbara Basso; Bao-Rong Lu
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-09-24       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Sustainable use of biotechnology for bioenergy feedstocks.

Authors:  Hong S Moon; Jason M Abercrombie; Albert P Kausch; C Neal Stewart
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Gene flow from herbicide-tolerant GM rice and the heterosis of GM rice-weed F2 progeny.

Authors:  Young Jin Chun; Dae In Kim; Kee Woong Park; Hyo-Jeong Kim; Soon-Chun Jeong; Ju Hee An; Kang Hyun Cho; Kyoungwhan Back; Hwan Mook Kim; Chang-Gi Kim
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Changes in fitness-associated traits due to the stacking of transgenic glyphosate resistance and insect resistance in Brassica napus L.

Authors:  J P Londo; M A Bollman; C L Sagers; E H Lee; L S Watrud
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  The ecological effects of exotic disease resistance genes introgressed into British gooseberries.

Authors:  John Warren; Penri James
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Novel insect resistance in Brassica napus developed by transformation of chitinase and scorpion toxin genes.

Authors:  Jingxue Wang; Zhenlang Chen; Jianzhong Du; Yi Sun; Aihua Liang
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 4.570

8.  Measuring gene flow in the cultivation of transgenic cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.).

Authors:  Bao-Hong Zhang; Xiao-Ping Pan; Teng-Long Guo; Qing-Lian Wang; Todd A Anderson
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.695

9.  Bisexual sterility conferred by the differential expression of barnase and barstar: a simple and efficient method of transgene containment.

Authors:  Kappei Kobayashi; Ikuko Munemura; Kokichi Hinata; Saburo Yamamura
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2006-07-21       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  The effect of Bt-transgene introgression on plant growth and reproduction in wild Brassica juncea.

Authors:  Yong-Bo Liu; Henry Darmency; C Neal Stewart; Wei Wei; Zhi-Xi Tang; Ke-Ping Ma
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.788
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.