Literature DB >> 25698098

Titanium-titanium modular neck for primary THA. Result of a prospective series of 170 cemented THA with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

M Ollivier1, S Parratte2, A Galland1, A Lunebourg1, X Flecher1, J-N Argenson1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although they have been in use since the end of the 1980s, modular titanium neck components are associated with a risk of wear or fracture, and their safety has recently become a subject of debate and has never been evaluated in a consecutive series of patients. The goal of this study was to evaluate: revision-free survival of these implants after a minimum follow-up of 5 years; clinical and radiographic results; and the potential complications associated with the use of modular titanium neck components. HYPOTHESIS: The use of titanium modular neck on cemented titanium THA is safe at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2006 and December 2008, we prospectively followed 170 patients (170 hips) who underwent primary anatomical THA with a modular cemented titanium stem design implant. The indications were unilateral THA for primary (n=160) or secondary (n=10) hip osteoarthritis (aseptic osteonecrosis of the femoral head or hip dysplasia). Mean age of patients was 75.4±5.8 years old (52-85), and mean BMI was 26.1±4.5 kg/m(2) (16.6-42.1). Patients were operated on by a modified Watson-Jones anterolateral approach based on preoperative 2D planning. All patients underwent annual clinical and radiological follow-up by an independent observer.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 71±8 months (60-84), 5 patients died and 7 were lost to follow-up. There was no revision of THA after a maximum follow-up of 84 months. The Harris score improved significantly from 50.4±11.3 (0-76) preoperatively to 84.5±15.2 (14-100) at the final follow-up. There was no difference in postoperative femoral offset or the position of the center of rotation compared to the opposite side. On the other hand, the neck-shaft angle (NSA) and limb length were corrected (2±5° [-11 to +14°] and 2.16±3.6 mm [-7.4 to +12.7 mm]) respectively. Fifteen patients (9%) had limb length discrepancies of more than 5 mm and 4 patients (2%) of more than 10 mm. There were no complications due to the modular implant design. DISCUSSION: Our study suggests that the use of cemented titanium implants with a modular titanium stem is safe at a follow-up of 5 years. The modular design does not prevent limb length discrepancies but restores femoral offset. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV: prospective, non-comparative study.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cemented stem; Hip anatomy; Modular neck; Total hip replacement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698098     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2014.12.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  4 in total

1.  Cementless modular neck stems: are they a safe option in primary total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  José M Pelayo-de-Tomás; José L Rodrigo-Pérez; Carlos D Novoa-Parra; Alejandro Lizaur-Utrilla; María Morales-Suárez-Varela; José Antonio Blas-Dobón
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-29

2.  Result of Modular Necks in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Average Follow-up of Four Years.

Authors:  Jemin Yi; Kye Young Han; Young Jun Nam; Keun Woo Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-09-30

3.  Mid-term outcomes of titanium modular neck femoral stems in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Hervé Ouanezar; Thomas Jalaguier; Florent Franck; Vincent Pibarot; Hugo Bothorel; Mo Saffarini; Jean-Pierre Piton
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-03

4.  Comment on: Modular titanium alloy neck failure in total hip replacement.

Authors:  Francesco Benazzo; Loris Perticarini
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-03-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.