Literature DB >> 25698097

Distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma using precontrast and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Yoshiki Asayama1, Akihiro Nishie, Kousei Ishigami, Yasuhiro Ushijima, Yukihisa Takayama, Nobuhiro Fujita, Yuichiro Kubo, Shinichi Aishima, Ken Shirabe, Takashi Yoshiura, Hiroshi Honda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aimed to gain further insight in magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of mass-forming intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (mICC), its enhancement pattern with gadoxetic acid contrast agent, and distinction from poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (pHCC).
METHODS: Fourteen mICC and 22 pHCC nodules were included in this study. Two observers recorded the tumor shape, intratumoral hemorrhage, fat on chemical shift imaging, signal intensity at the center of the tumor on T2-weighted image, fibrous capsule, enhancement pattern on arterial phase of dynamic study, late enhancement three minutes after contrast injection (dynamic late phase), contrast uptake on hepatobiliary phase, apparent diffusion coefficient, vascular invasion, and intrahepatic metastasis.
RESULTS: Late enhancement was more common in mICC (n=10, 71%) than in pHCC (n=3, 14%) (P < 0.001). A fat component was observed in 11 pHCC cases (50%) versus none of mICC cases (P = 0.002). Fibrous capsule was observed in 13 pHCC cases (59%) versus none of mICC cases (P < 0.001). On T2-weighted images a hypointense area was seen at the center of the tumor in 43% of mICC (6/14) and 9% of pHCC (2/22) cases (P = 0.018). Other parameters were not significantly different between the two types of nodules.
CONCLUSION: The absence of fat and fibrous capsule, and presence of enhancement at three minutes appear to be most characteristic for mICC and may help its differentiation from pHCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698097      PMCID: PMC4463313          DOI: 10.5152/dir.2014.13013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol        ISSN: 1305-3825            Impact factor:   2.630


  25 in total

Review 1.  Cholangiocarcinoma: morphologic classification according to growth pattern and imaging findings.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Lim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Akihiro Nishie; Tsuyoshi Tajima; Yoshiki Asayama; Kousei Ishigami; Daisuke Kakihara; Tomohiro Nakayama; Yukihisa Takayama; Daisuke Okamoto; Nobuhiro Fujita; Akinobu Taketomi; Kengo Yoshimitsu; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 3.528

3.  Comparison of magnetic properties of MRI contrast media solutions at different magnetic field strengths.

Authors:  Martin Rohrer; Hans Bauer; Jan Mintorovitch; Martin Requardt; Hanns-Joachim Weinmann
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanners compared with 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanners: systematic review of clinical effectiveness.

Authors:  R Wood; K Bassett; C Spry; L Tong
Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv       Date:  2012-06-01

5.  MR imaging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with pathologic correlation.

Authors:  Y Maetani; K Itoh; C Watanabe; T Shibata; F Ametani; H Yamabe; J Konishi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 6.  Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Kristina I Ringe; Daniela B Husarik; Claude B Sirlin; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA by hepatocellular carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation with special reference to bile production.

Authors:  Yoshiki Asayama; Tsuyoshi Tajima; Akihiro Nishie; Kousei Ishigami; Daisuke Kakihara; Tomohiro Nakayama; Daisuke Okamoto; Nobuhiro Fujita; Shinichi Aishima; Ken Shirabe; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.528

8.  Cholangiocarcinoma: delayed CT contrast enhancement patterns.

Authors:  J M Lacomis; R L Baron; J H Oliver; M A Nalesnik; M P Federle
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  "Pseudo washout" sign in high-flow hepatic hemangioma on gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI mimicking hypervascular tumor.

Authors:  Kyung Won Doo; Chang Hee Lee; Jae Woong Choi; Jongmee Lee; Kyeong Ah Kim; Cheol Min Park
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Intrahepatic mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma: enhancement patterns on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images.

Authors:  Yusuhn Kang; Jeong Min Lee; Seung Ho Kim; Joon Koo Han; Byung Ihn Choi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Capsule, septum, and T2 hyperintense foci for differentiation between large hepatocellular carcinoma (≥5 cm) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma on gadoxetic acid MRI.

Authors:  Jiyoung Hwang; Young Kon Kim; Ji Hye Min; Seo-Youn Choi; Woo Kyung Jeong; Seong Sook Hong; Hyun-Joo Kim; Soohyun Ahn; Hyeon Seon Ahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Recent Advances in the Imaging Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Value of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Ijin Joo; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 11.740

3.  Added value of smooth hypointense rim in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in identifying tumour capsule and diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Chansik An; Hyungjin Rhee; Kyunghwa Han; Jin-Young Choi; Young-Nyun Park; Mi-Suk Park; Myeong-Jin Kim; Sumi Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) versus non-HCC: accuracy and reliability of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System v2018.

Authors:  Daniel R Ludwig; Tyler J Fraum; Roberto Cannella; David H Ballard; Richard Tsai; Muhammad Naeem; Maverick LeBlanc; Amber Salter; Allan Tsung; Anup S Shetty; Amir A Borhani; Alessandro Furlan; Kathryn J Fowler
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-06

5.  Identification of Imaging Predictors Discriminating Different Primary Liver Tumours in Patients with Chronic Liver Disease on Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI: a Classification Tree Analysis.

Authors:  Hyun Jeong Park; Kyung Mi Jang; Tae Wook Kang; Kyoung Doo Song; Seong Hyun Kim; Young Kon Kim; Dong Ik Cha; Joungyoun Kim; Juna Goo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantitative evaluation of focal liver lesions with T1 mapping using a phase-sensitive inversion recovery sequence on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Motohira Mio; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Kazuki Tani; Tatsuo Toyofuku; Toshihiro Maeda; Toshiro Inoue
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2020-12-24

7.  Value of perfusion parameters histogram analysis of triphasic CT in differentiating intrahepatic mass forming cholangiocarcinoma from hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Fang Zhao; Guodong Pang; Xuejing Li; Shuo Yang; Hai Zhong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Imaging Spectrum of Intrahepatic Mass-Forming Cholangiocarcinoma and Its Mimickers: How to Differentiate Them Using MRI.

Authors:  Jelena Djokic Kovač; Aleksandra Janković; Aleksandra Đikić-Rom; Nikica Grubor; Andrija Antić; Vladimir Dugalić
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 3.677

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.