Literature DB >> 23002376

1.5 tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanners compared with 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging scanners: systematic review of clinical effectiveness.

R Wood, K Bassett, C Spry, L Tong.   

Abstract

Year:  2012        PMID： 23002376      PMCID： PMC3442613     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CADTH Technol Overv        ISSN： 1203-9012


× No keyword cloud information.
  1 in total

1.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance for pulmonary nodules: 1.5 vs. 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Yasuomi Ohba; Hiroaki Nomori; Takeshi Mori; Kenji Shiraishi; Tomohiro Namimoto; Kazuhiro Katahira
Journal:  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann       Date:  2011-04
  1 in total
  9 in total

1.  Distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma from poorly differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma using precontrast and gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Yoshiki Asayama; Akihiro Nishie; Kousei Ishigami; Yasuhiro Ushijima; Yukihisa Takayama; Nobuhiro Fujita; Yuichiro Kubo; Shinichi Aishima; Ken Shirabe; Takashi Yoshiura; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Neurological Soft Signs and Brain Network Abnormalities in Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Li Kong; Christina J Herold; Eric F C Cheung; Raymond C K Chan; Johannes Schröder
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 9.306

3.  Prefronto-temporal white matter microstructural alterations 20 years after the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Sujung Yoon; Jungyoon Kim; Gail Musen; Perry F Renshaw; Jaeuk Hwang; Nicolas R Bolo; Jieun E Kim; Donald C Simonson; Katie Weinger; Christopher M Ryan; In Kyoon Lyoo; Alan M Jacobson
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 4.866

4.  MR imaging of the fetal brain at 1.5T and 3.0T field strengths: comparing specific absorption rate (SAR) and image quality.

Authors:  Uday Krishnamurthy; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Swati Mody; Lami Yeo; Pavan K Jella; Sheena Saleem; Steven J Korzeniewski; Maria D Cabrera; Shadi Ehterami; Ray O Bahado-Singh; Yashwanth Katkuri; Ewart M Haacke; Edgar Hernandez-Andrade; Sonia S Hassan; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.901

5.  Correlation among Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameters of Brain in Preterm Neonates at Term Equivalent Age.

Authors:  Umamaheswari Balakrishnan; Prakash Amboiram; Binu Ninan; Anupama Chandrasekar; Rajeswaran Rangasami
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Magnetic Resonance-Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Ablation of Uterine Fibroids-Efficiency Assessment with the Use of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Potential Role of the Administration of Uterotonic Drugs.

Authors:  Tomasz Łoziński; Michał Ciebiera; Elżbieta Łuczyńska; Justyna Filipowska; Artur Czekierdowski
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-16

7.  Task group 284 report: magnetic resonance imaging simulation in radiotherapy: considerations for clinical implementation, optimization, and quality assurance.

Authors:  Carri K Glide-Hurst; Eric S Paulson; Kiaran McGee; Neelam Tyagi; Yanle Hu; James Balter; John Bayouth
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The clinical utility of fMRI for identifying covert awareness in the vegetative state: a comparison of sensitivity between 3T and 1.5T.

Authors:  Davinia Fernández-Espejo; Loretta Norton; Adrian M Owen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Health outcomes and experiences of direct-to-consumer high-intensity screening using both whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and cardiological examination.

Authors:  Daniel Hommes; Derk Klatte; Wilma Otten; Maaike Beltman; Günter Klass; Aria Zand; René Sprangers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.