Literature DB >> 25698005

Release from informational masking in a monaural competing-speech task with vocoded copies of the maskers presented contralaterally.

Joshua G W Bernstein1, Nandini Iyer2, Douglas S Brungart1.   

Abstract

Single-sided deafness prevents access to the binaural cues that help normal-hearing listeners extract target speech from competing voices. Little is known about how listeners with one normal-hearing ear might benefit from access to severely degraded audio signals that preserve only envelope information in the second ear. This study investigated whether vocoded masker-envelope information presented to one ear could improve performance for normal-hearing listeners in a multi-talker speech-identification task presented to the other ear. Target speech and speech or non-speech maskers were presented unprocessed to the left ear. The right ear received no signal, or either an unprocessed or eight-channel noise-vocoded copy of the maskers. Presenting the vocoded maskers contralaterally yielded significant masking release from same-gender speech maskers, albeit less than in the unprocessed case, but not from opposite-gender speech, stationary-noise, or modulated-noise maskers. Unmasking also occurred with as few as two vocoder channels and when an attenuated copy of the target signal was added to the maskers before vocoding. These data show that delivering masker-envelope information contralaterally generates masking release in situations where target-masker similarity impedes monaural speech-identification performance. By delivering speech-envelope information to a deaf ear, cochlear implants for single-sided deafness have the potential to produce a similar effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25698005     DOI: 10.1121/1.4906167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  7 in total

1.  Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Implications for within- and across-ear envelope comparison.

Authors:  Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Counting or discriminating the number of voices to assess binaural fusion with single-sided vocoders.

Authors:  Jessica M Wess; Nathaniel J Spencer; Joshua G W Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Mechanisms of Localization and Speech Perception with Colocated and Spatially Separated Noise and Speech Maskers Under Single-Sided Deafness with a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Coral Dirks; Peggy B Nelson; Douglas P Sladen; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Reducing interaural tonotopic mismatch preserves binaural unmasking in cochlear implant simulations of single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Mahan Azadpour; Jonathan Neukam; Nicole Hope Capach; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Effects of insertion depth on spatial speech perception in noise for simulations of cochlear implants and single-sided deafness.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Zhou; Huajun Li; John J Galvin; Qian-Jie Fu; Wei Yuan
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Having Two Ears Facilitates the Perceptual Separation of Concurrent Talkers for Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implantees.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Matthew J Goupell; Gerald I Schuchman; Arnaldo L Rivera; Douglas S Brungart
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.