Literature DB >> 15689862

A prospective randomized comparison of bioabsorbable and titanium anterior cruciate ligament interference screws.

Christopher Kaeding1, Jack Farr, Tim Kavanaugh, Angela Pedroza.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the Phantom bioabsorbable polymer interference screw (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) with a titanium metal interference screw when used in fixation of femoral and tibial bone blocks in central third bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. TYPE OF STUDY: Multicentered prospective randomized study.
METHODS: Two surgeons performed primary ACL reconstructions at different locations. Preoperatively, the patients were randomly assigned. One group received a titanium cannulated interference screw. The second group received the cannulated poly-L-lactic bioabsorbable Phantom screw. Data included subjective evaluation of activity level and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Objective measures were made using the KT-1000 arthrometer (MedMetric, San Diego, CA), range of motion, presence of effusions, and complications intraoperatively or postoperatively. Measurements were made at 1 year and 2 years. Radiographic evaluation was carried out at least 2 years from the initial surgical date and interpreted by 2 independent orthopaedic surgeons.
RESULTS: At the 1-year follow-up (N = 97), pain was reported more during moderate activity in the Phantom screw group (6) compared with the titanium screw group (0) (P = .03). No statistical difference between range of motion (P = .45), activity level (P = .83), swelling with activity (P = .95), partial (P = .13) or full (P = .31) giving way, knee effusions (P = .33), or KT-1000 side-to-side difference (P = .53) were found. At the 2-year follow-up (N = 65), more subjects (18) in the Phantom interference screw group reported activity levels in the strenuous category compared with those in the titanium interference screws (7) group (P = .02). No differences were reported with respect to pain (P = .97), effusion (P = .17), partial (P = .28) or full (P = .27) giving way, swelling with activity (P = .21), range of motion ( P = .64), or KT-1000 side-to-side difference (P = .96). Radiographic inspection showed no change in bone plug position, osteolysis, adverse effect, or complication caused by the bioabsorbable material. Some evidence of tunnel widening was seen in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a poly-L-lactic bioabsorbable interference screw can provide clinical results equal to that of a metal interference screw for fixation of a central third bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15689862     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  20 in total

1.  CALAXO osteoconductive interference screw: the value of postmarket surveillance.

Authors:  Charles L Cox; Kelly C Homlar; James L Carey; Kurt P Spindler
Journal:  J Surg Orthop Adv       Date:  2010

2.  Recurrent locking of knee joint caused by intraarticular migration of bioabsorbable tibial interference screw after arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Appelt; Martin Baier
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Biomechanical Comparison Between Bashti Bone Plug Technique and Biodegradable Screw for Fixation of Grafts in Ligament surgery.

Authors:  Kaveh Bashti; Mohammad N Tahmasebi; Hasan Kaseb; Farzam Farahmand; Mohammad Akbar; Amir Mobini
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2015-01-15

4.  Meta-analysis comparing bioabsorbable versus metal interference screw for adverse and clinical outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pat Laupattarakasem; Malinee Laopaiboon; Weerachai Kosuwon; Wiroon Laupattarakasem
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Do newer-generation bioabsorbable screws become incorporated into bone at two years after ACL reconstruction with patellar tendon graft?: A cohort study.

Authors:  Charles L Cox; Kurt P Spindler; James P Leonard; Brent J Morris; Warren R Dunn; Emily K Reinke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 6.  Fixation techniques for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: early follow-up. A systematic review of level I and II therapeutic studies.

Authors:  Andrea Speziali; Marco Delcogliano; Matteo Tei; Giacomo Placella; Matteo Bartoli; Amerigo Menghi; Giuliano Cerulli
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-10-01

7.  Biomechanical testing of implant free wedge shaped bone block fixation for bone patellar tendon bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a bovine model.

Authors:  Charles A Willis-Owen; Trevor C Hearn; Gregory C Keene; John J Costi
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  MR in the evaluation of new anterior cruciate ligament and tibial tunnel position: correlation with clinical and functional features.

Authors:  N Magarelli; C Carducci; G Cannataro; G Graziano; A Leone; D Palmieri; M Barbato; F Ciampa; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Tibial tunnel widening after bioresorbable poly-lactide calcium carbonate interference screw usage in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Casper Foldager; Bent W Jakobsen; Bent Lund; Svend Erik Christiansen; Lotte Kashi; Lone R Mikkelsen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Pedro Debieux; Carlos E S Franciozi; Mário Lenza; Marcel Jun Tamaoki; Robert A Magnussen; Flávio Faloppa; João Carlos Belloti
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.