Literature DB >> 25689024

Feeding currents facilitate a mixotrophic way of life.

Lasse T Nielsen1, Thomas Kiørboe1.   

Abstract

Mixotrophy is common, if not dominant, among eukaryotic flagellates, and these organisms have to both acquire inorganic nutrients and capture particulate food. Diffusion limitation favors small cell size for nutrient acquisition, whereas large cell size facilitates prey interception because of viscosity, and hence intermediately sized mixotrophic dinoflagellates are simultaneously constrained by diffusion and viscosity. Advection may help relax both constraints. We use high-speed video microscopy to describe prey interception and capture, and micro particle image velocimetry (micro-PIV) to quantify the flow fields produced by free-swimming dinoflagellates. We provide the first complete flow fields of free-swimming interception feeders, and demonstrate the use of feeding currents. These are directed toward the prey capture area, the position varying between the seven dinoflagellate species studied, and we argue that this efficiently allows the grazer to approach small-sized prey despite viscosity. Measured flow fields predict the magnitude of observed clearance rates. The fluid deformation created by swimming dinoflagellates may be detected by evasive prey, but the magnitude of flow deformation in the feeding current varies widely between species and depends on the position of the transverse flagellum. We also use the near-cell flow fields to calculate nutrient transport to swimming cells and find that feeding currents may enhance nutrient uptake by ≈75% compared with that by diffusion alone. We argue that all phagotrophic microorganisms must have developed adaptations to counter viscosity in order to allow prey interception, and conclude that the flow fields created by the beating flagella in dinoflagellates are key to the success of these mixotrophic organisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25689024      PMCID: PMC4579469          DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2015.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ISME J        ISSN: 1751-7362            Impact factor:   10.302


  7 in total

1.  How dinoflagellates swim.

Authors:  T Fenchel
Journal:  Protist       Date:  2001-12

Review 2.  How zooplankton feed: mechanisms, traits and trade-offs.

Authors:  Thomas Kiørboe
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2011-05

3.  Fluid dynamics and noise in bacterial cell-cell and cell-surface scattering.

Authors:  Knut Drescher; Jörn Dunkel; Luis H Cisneros; Sujoy Ganguly; Raymond E Goldstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Swimming behaviour of the unicellular biflagellate Oxyrrhis marina: in vivo and in vitro movement of the two flagella.

Authors:  J Cosson; M Cachon; J Cachon; M P Cosson
Journal:  Biol Cell       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Direct measurement of the flow field around swimming microorganisms.

Authors:  Knut Drescher; Raymond E Goldstein; Nicolas Michel; Marco Polin; Idan Tuval
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 9.161

6.  Flow disturbances generated by feeding and swimming zooplankton.

Authors:  Thomas Kiørboe; Houshuo Jiang; Rodrigo Javier Gonçalves; Lasse Tor Nielsen; Navish Wadhwa
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Green Algae as Model Organisms for Biological Fluid Dynamics.

Authors:  Raymond E Goldstein
Journal:  Annu Rev Fluid Mech       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 18.511

  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Combining morphology, behaviour and genomics to understand the evolution and ecology of microbial eukaryotes.

Authors:  Patrick J Keeling
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Scale-free vertical tracking microscopy.

Authors:  Deepak Krishnamurthy; Hongquan Li; François Benoit du Rey; Pierre Cambournac; Adam G Larson; Ethan Li; Manu Prakash
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Heterokont Predator Develorapax marinus gen. et sp. nov. - A Model of the Ochrophyte Ancestor.

Authors:  Vladimir V Aleoshin; Alexander P Mylnikov; Gulnara S Mirzaeva; Kirill V Mikhailov; Sergey A Karpov
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 4.  A Review of Planar PIV Systems and Image Processing Tools for Lab-On-Chip Microfluidics.

Authors:  Fahrettin Gökhan Ergin; Bo Beltoft Watz; Nicolai Fog Gade-Nielsen
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Effect of TDA-producing Phaeobacter inhibens on the fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum in non-axenic algae and copepod systems.

Authors:  Bastian Barker Rasmussen; Katrine Ege Erner; Mikkel Bentzon-Tilia; Lone Gram
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2018-05-06       Impact factor: 5.813

6.  Nitrate and ammonium fluxes to diatoms and dinoflagellates at a single cell level in mixed field communities in the sea.

Authors:  Malin Olofsson; Elizabeth K Robertson; Lars Edler; Lars Arneborg; Martin J Whitehouse; Helle Ploug
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.