OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a performance battery and its components aid in predicting injurious falls. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis; prospective cohort study. SETTING: Clinical site. PARTICIPANTS: Boston-area community-dwelling adults (N = 755; mean age ± SD 78.1 ± 5.4, 64.1% female, 77.6% white). MEASUREMENTS: Baseline functional performance was determined according to the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), measuring balance, gait speed, and five repeated chair stands. Fall history (past year) and efficacy in performing 10 daily activities without falling were assessed. Falls were assessed using a daily calendar over 4 years. Injurious falls were defined as resulting in fractures, sprains, dislocations, pulled or torn muscles, ligaments, or tendons or seeking medical attention. RESULTS: Poorest chair stand performance (≥16.7 seconds) was associated with greater hazard of injurious falls than in all other chair stand performance groups (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.18-3.26 for ≥ 16.7 vs. 13.7-16.6 seconds; HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07-2.55 for ≥ 16.7 vs. 11.2-13.6 seconds, HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.03-2.48 for ≥ 16.7 vs. <11.2 seconds). SPPB did not predict injurious falls. Fall history predicted injurious falls (HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.39-2.39); falls efficacy did not. Fall history and a slow chair stand (<16.7 seconds) had a 2-year cumulative incidence rate of an injurious fall of 46% (95% CI = 0.34-0.58), nearly the combined rate of a positive fall history (0.29, 95% CI = 0.25-0.34) and a slow chair stand alone (0.21, 95% CI = 0.13-0.30). CONCLUSION: An easily administered chair stand test may be sufficient for evaluating performance as part of a risk stratification strategy for injurious falls.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a performance battery and its components aid in predicting injurious falls. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis; prospective cohort study. SETTING: Clinical site. PARTICIPANTS: Boston-area community-dwelling adults (N = 755; mean age ± SD 78.1 ± 5.4, 64.1% female, 77.6% white). MEASUREMENTS: Baseline functional performance was determined according to the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), measuring balance, gait speed, and five repeated chair stands. Fall history (past year) and efficacy in performing 10 daily activities without falling were assessed. Falls were assessed using a daily calendar over 4 years. Injurious falls were defined as resulting in fractures, sprains, dislocations, pulled or torn muscles, ligaments, or tendons or seeking medical attention. RESULTS: Poorest chair stand performance (≥16.7 seconds) was associated with greater hazard of injurious falls than in all other chair stand performance groups (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.18-3.26 for ≥ 16.7 vs. 13.7-16.6 seconds; HR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.07-2.55 for ≥ 16.7 vs. 11.2-13.6 seconds, HR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.03-2.48 for ≥ 16.7 vs. <11.2 seconds). SPPB did not predict injurious falls. Fall history predicted injurious falls (HR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.39-2.39); falls efficacy did not. Fall history and a slow chair stand (<16.7 seconds) had a 2-year cumulative incidence rate of an injurious fall of 46% (95% CI = 0.34-0.58), nearly the combined rate of a positive fall history (0.29, 95% CI = 0.25-0.34) and a slow chair stand alone (0.21, 95% CI = 0.13-0.30). CONCLUSION: An easily administered chair stand test may be sufficient for evaluating performance as part of a risk stratification strategy for injurious falls.
Authors: Sarah E Lamb; Chris McCabe; Clemens Becker; Linda P Fried; Jack M Guralnik Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Lien Quach; Andrew M Galica; Richard N Jones; Elizabeth Procter-Gray; Brad Manor; Marian T Hannan; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-06-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Suzanne G Leveille; Douglas P Kiel; Richard N Jones; Anthony Roman; Marian T Hannan; Farzaneh A Sorond; Hyun G Kang; Elizabeth J Samelson; Margaret Gagnon; Marcie Freeman; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Cristina A Shea; Rachel E Ward; Sarah A Welch; Dan K Kiely; Richard Goldstein; Jonathan F Bean Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: Å von Berens; T Cederholm; R A Fielding; T Gustafsson; D Kirn; J Laussen; M Nydahl; T G Travison; K Reid; A Koochek Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2018 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Connie W Wang; Kenneth E Covinsky; Sandy Feng; Hilary Hayssen; Dorry L Segev; Jennifer C Lai Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2015-11-06 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Mini E Jacob; Thomas G Travison; Rachel E Ward; Nancy K Latham; Suzanne G Leveille; Alan M Jette; Jonathan F Bean Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-03-14 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Eric S Orwoll; Nora F Fino; Thomas M Gill; Jane A Cauley; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Kristine E Ensrud; Deborah M Kado; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Douglas C Bauer; Peggy M Cawthon; Jodi Lapidus Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-08-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: N C Wright; E R Hooker; C M Nielson; K E Ensrud; S L Harrison; E S Orwoll; E Barrett-Connor Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 4.507