Lien Quach1, Andrew M Galica, Richard N Jones, Elizabeth Procter-Gray, Brad Manor, Marian T Hannan, Lewis A Lipsitz. 1. From the *Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, Massachusetts; †Division of Gerontology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and ‡Division of Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between gait speed and falls risk. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of the association between gait speed and subsequent falls and analysis of gait speed decline as a predictor of future falls. SETTING: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred sixty-three community-dwelling older adults underwent baseline assessments and were followed for falls; 600 completed an 18-month follow-up assessment to determine change in gait speed and were followed for subsequent falls. MEASUREMENTS: Gait speed was measured during a 4-m walk, falls data were collected from monthly post-card calendars, and covariates were collected from in-home and clinic visits. RESULTS: There was a U-shaped relationship between gait speed and falls, with participants with faster (≥1.3 m/s, incident rate ratio (IRR)=2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.48-3.04) and slower (<0.6 m/s, IRR=1.60, 95% CI=1.06-2.42) gait speeds at higher risk than those with normal gait speeds (1.0-<1.3 m/s). In adjusted analyses, slower gait speeds were associated with greater risk of indoor falls (<0.6 m/s, IRR=2.17, 95% CI=1.33-3.55; 0.6-<1.0 m/s, IRR=1.45, 95% CI=1.08-1.94), and faster gait speed was associated with greater risk of outdoor falls (IRR=2.11, 95% CI=1.40-3.16). A gait speed decline of more than 0.15 m/s per year predicted greater risk of all falls (IRR=1.86, 95% CI=1.15-3.01). CONCLUSION: There is a nonlinear relationship between gait speed and falls, with a greater risk of outdoor falls in fast walkers and a greater risk of indoor falls in slow walkers.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship between gait speed and falls risk. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of the association between gait speed and subsequent falls and analysis of gait speed decline as a predictor of future falls. SETTING: Population-based cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Seven hundred sixty-three community-dwelling older adults underwent baseline assessments and were followed for falls; 600 completed an 18-month follow-up assessment to determine change in gait speed and were followed for subsequent falls. MEASUREMENTS: Gait speed was measured during a 4-m walk, falls data were collected from monthly post-card calendars, and covariates were collected from in-home and clinic visits. RESULTS: There was a U-shaped relationship between gait speed and falls, with participants with faster (≥1.3 m/s, incident rate ratio (IRR)=2.12, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.48-3.04) and slower (<0.6 m/s, IRR=1.60, 95% CI=1.06-2.42) gait speeds at higher risk than those with normal gait speeds (1.0-<1.3 m/s). In adjusted analyses, slower gait speeds were associated with greater risk of indoor falls (<0.6 m/s, IRR=2.17, 95% CI=1.33-3.55; 0.6-<1.0 m/s, IRR=1.45, 95% CI=1.08-1.94), and faster gait speed was associated with greater risk of outdoor falls (IRR=2.11, 95% CI=1.40-3.16). A gait speed decline of more than 0.15 m/s per year predicted greater risk of all falls (IRR=1.86, 95% CI=1.15-3.01). CONCLUSION: There is a nonlinear relationship between gait speed and falls, with a greater risk of outdoor falls in fast walkers and a greater risk of indoor falls in slow walkers.
Authors: Elizabeth J Samelson; Jennifer L Kelsey; Douglas P Kiel; Anthony M Roman; L Adrienne Cupples; Marcie B Freeman; Richard N Jones; Marian T Hannan; Suzanne G Leveille; Margaret M Gagnon; Lewis A Lipsitz Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2008-10-25 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: R Altman; E Asch; D Bloch; G Bole; D Borenstein; K Brandt; W Christy; T D Cooke; R Greenwald; M Hochberg Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 1986-08
Authors: Jennifer L Kelsey; Mila M Prill; Theresa H M Keegan; Heather E Tanner; Allan L Bernstein; Charles P Quesenberry; Stephen Sidney Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-10-26 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: G Abellan van Kan; Y Rolland; S Andrieu; J Bauer; O Beauchet; M Bonnefoy; M Cesari; L M Donini; S Gillette Guyonnet; M Inzitari; F Nourhashemi; G Onder; P Ritz; A Salva; M Visser; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Lewis A Lipsitz; Eric A Macklin; Thomas G Travison; Brad Manor; Peggy Gagnon; Timothy Tsai; Ilean Isaza Aizpurúa; On-Yee Lo; Peter M Wayne Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-05-22 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lorraine J Phillips; Chelsea B DeRoche; Marilyn Rantz; Gregory L Alexander; Marjorie Skubic; Laurel Despins; Carmen Abbott; Bradford H Harris; Colleen Galambos; Richelle J Koopman Journal: West J Nurs Res Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Renae L Smith-Ray; Susan L Hughes; Thomas R Prohaska; Deborah M Little; Donald A Jurivich; Donald Hedeker Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2013-11-05 Impact factor: 4.077