Eric S Orwoll1, Nora F Fino2, Thomas M Gill3, Jane A Cauley4, Elsa S Strotmeyer4, Kristine E Ensrud5,6, Deborah M Kado7, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor7, Douglas C Bauer8, Peggy M Cawthon9, Jodi Lapidus2. 1. Department of Medicine, Bone and Mineral Unit, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. 2. Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and the Biostatistics and Design Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland. 3. Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis. 6. Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 7. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Francisco. 8. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco. 9. California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical performance and activity have both been linked to fall risk, but the way they are jointly associated with falls is unclear. We investigated how these two factors are related to incident falls in older men. METHODS: In 2,741 men (78.8 ± 5 years), we evaluated the associations between activity and physical performance and how they jointly contributed to incident falls. Activity was assessed by accelerometry. Physical performance was measured by gait speed, dynamic balance (narrow walk), chair stand time, grip strength, and leg power. Falls were ascertained by tri-annual questionnaires. RESULTS: Men were grouped into four categories based on activity and performance levels. The greatest number of falls (36%-43%) and the highest fall rate (4.7-5.4/y among those who fell) (depending on the performance test) occurred in men with low activity/low performance, but most falls (57%-64%) and relatively high fall rates (3.0-4.35/y) occurred in the other groups (low activity/high performance, high activity/high performance and high activity/low performance; 70% of men were in these groups). There were interactions between activity, performance (gait speed, narrow walk), and incident falls (p = .001-.02); predicted falls per year were highest in men with low activity/low performance, but there was also a peak of predicted falls in those with high activity. CONCLUSIONS: In community-dwelling older men, many falls occur in those with the lowest activity/worst physical performance but fall risk is also substantial with better activity and performance. Activity/physical performance assessments may improve identification of older men at risk of falls, and allow individualized approaches to prevention.
BACKGROUND: Physical performance and activity have both been linked to fall risk, but the way they are jointly associated with falls is unclear. We investigated how these two factors are related to incident falls in older men. METHODS: In 2,741 men (78.8 ± 5 years), we evaluated the associations between activity and physical performance and how they jointly contributed to incident falls. Activity was assessed by accelerometry. Physical performance was measured by gait speed, dynamic balance (narrow walk), chair stand time, grip strength, and leg power. Falls were ascertained by tri-annual questionnaires. RESULTS:Men were grouped into four categories based on activity and performance levels. The greatest number of falls (36%-43%) and the highest fall rate (4.7-5.4/y among those who fell) (depending on the performance test) occurred in men with low activity/low performance, but most falls (57%-64%) and relatively high fall rates (3.0-4.35/y) occurred in the other groups (low activity/high performance, high activity/high performance and high activity/low performance; 70% of men were in these groups). There were interactions between activity, performance (gait speed, narrow walk), and incident falls (p = .001-.02); predicted falls per year were highest in men with low activity/low performance, but there was also a peak of predicted falls in those with high activity. CONCLUSIONS: In community-dwelling older men, many falls occur in those with the lowest activity/worst physical performance but fall risk is also substantial with better activity and performance. Activity/physical performance assessments may improve identification of older men at risk of falls, and allow individualized approaches to prevention.
Authors: B E Ainsworth; W L Haskell; M C Whitt; M L Irwin; A M Swartz; S J Strath; W L O'Brien; D R Bassett; K H Schmitz; P O Emplaincourt; D R Jacobs; A S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Kristine E Ensrud; Terri L Blackwell; Jane A Cauley; Thuy-Tien L Dam; Peggy M Cawthon; John T Schousboe; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Katie L Stone; Douglas C Bauer; James M Shikany; Dawn C Mackey Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Barbara E Ainsworth; William L Haskell; Stephen D Herrmann; Nathanael Meckes; David R Bassett; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Jennifer L Greer; Jesse Vezina; Melicia C Whitt-Glover; Arthur S Leon Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Benjamin K S Chan; Lynn M Marshall; Kerri M Winters; Kimberly A Faulkner; Ann V Schwartz; Eric S Orwoll Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2006-12-28 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Geoffrey J Hoffman; Jinkyung Ha; Neil B Alexander; Kenneth M Langa; Mary Tinetti; Lillian C Min Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-04-17 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer W Bea; Cynthia A Thomson; Robert B Wallace; Chunyuan Wu; Rebecca A Seguin; Scott B Going; Andrea LaCroix; Charles Eaton; Judith K Ockene; Michael J LaMonte; Rebecca Jackson; W Jerry Mysiw; Jean Wactawski-Wende Journal: Prev Med Date: 2016-12-06 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Peggy Mannen Cawthon; Robin L Fullman; Lynn Marshall; Dawn C Mackey; Howard A Fink; Jane A Cauley; Steven R Cummings; Eric S Orwoll; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Thomas M Gill; Marco Pahor; Jack M Guralnik; Mary M McDermott; Abby C King; Thomas W Buford; Elsa S Strotmeyer; Miriam E Nelson; Kaycee M Sink; Jamehl L Demons; Susan S Kashaf; Michael P Walkup; Michael E Miller Journal: BMJ Date: 2016-02-03
Authors: Jian-Yu E; Aleksandra Mihailovic; Pei-Lun Kuo; Sheila K West; David S Friedman; Laura N Gitlin; Tianjing Li; Jennifer A Schrack; Pradeep Y Ramulu Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-05-15 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Deepika R Laddu; Neeta Parimi; Katie L Stone; Jodi Lapidus; Andrew R Hoffman; Marcia L Stefanick; Lisa Langsetmo Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-25 Impact factor: 6.053