Literature DB >> 25687562

The risk of infant and fetal death by each additional week of expectant management in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy by gestational age.

Anela Puljic1, Elissa Kim2, Jessica Page3, Tania Esakoff4, Brian Shaffer5, Daphne Y LaCoursiere2, Aaron B Caughey5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to characterize the risk of infant and fetal death by each additional week of expectant management vs immediate delivery in pregnancies complicated by cholestasis. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 1,604,386 singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies of women between 34 and 40 weeks' gestation with and without intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) in the state of California during the years of 2005-2008. International Classification of Diseases, 9th version, codes and linked hospital discharge and vital statistics data were utilized. For each week of gestation, the following outcomes were assessed: the risk of stillbirth, the risk of delivery (represented by the risk of infant death at a given week of gestation), and the composite risk of expectant management for 1 additional week. Composite risk combines the risk of stillbirth at this gestational age week plus the risk of infant death if delivered at the subsequent week of gestation.
RESULTS: Among women with ICP, the mortality risk of delivery is lower than the risk of expectant management at 36 weeks' gestation (4.7 vs 19.2 per 10,000). The risk of expectant management remains higher than delivery and continues to rise by week of gestation beyond 36 weeks. The risk of expectant management in women with ICP reaches a nadir at 35 weeks (9.1 per 10,000; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-16.9) and rises at 36 weeks (19.2 per 10,000; 95% confidence interval, 7.6-30.8).
CONCLUSION: Among women with ICP, delivery at 36 weeks' gestation would reduce the perinatal mortality risk as compared with expectant management. For later diagnoses, this would also be true at gestational ages beyond 36 weeks. Timing of delivery must take into account both the reduction in stillbirth risk balanced with the morbidities associated with preterm delivery.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  expectant management; intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy; stillbirth

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25687562     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  34 in total

Review 1.  [Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy : Rare but important].

Authors:  A E Kremer; K Wolf; S Ständer
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.751

2.  Population Scale Retrospective Analysis Reveals Potential Risk of Cholestasis in Pregnant Women Taking Omeprazole, Lansoprazole, and Amoxicillin.

Authors:  Yonghong Zhang; Da Shi; Ruben Abagyan; Weina Dai; Mingyang Dong
Journal:  Interdiscip Sci       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 2.233

Review 3.  Review of a challenging clinical issue: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  Sebiha Ozkan; Yasin Ceylan; Orhan Veli Ozkan; Sule Yildirim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Predictors of adverse neonatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kawakita; Laura I Parikh; Patrick S Ramsey; Chun-Chih Huang; Alexander Zeymo; Miguel Fernandez; Samuel Smith; Sara N Iqbal
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Serum Bile Acids in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy (ICP), Versus Pregnant and Nonpregnant Controls in Asian Indian Women and a Proposed Scoring to Optimize Management in ICP.

Authors:  Nutan Agarwal; Reeta Mahey; Vidushi Kulshrestha; Alka Kriplani; Anoop Saraya; Vikas Sachdev
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-06-26

6.  Induction of Labour. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k, AWMF Registry No. 015-088, December 2020).

Authors:  Sven Kehl; Irene Hösli; Ulrich Pecks; Philipp Reif; Ralf L Schild; Markus Schmidt; Dagmar Schmitz; Christiane Schwarz; Daniel Surbek; Michael Abou-Dakn
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.754

7.  Total serum bile acids or serum bile acid profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  Cristina Manzotti; Giovanni Casazza; Tea Stimac; Dimitrinka Nikolova; Christian Gluud
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-05

Review 8.  Evaluating the effectiveness and safety of ursodeoxycholic acid in treatment of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A meta-analysis (a prisma-compliant study).

Authors:  Xiang Kong; Yan Kong; Fangyuan Zhang; Tingting Wang; Jin Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  The prevalence and pregnancy outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: A retrospective clinical audit review.

Authors:  Fergus W Gardiner; Ruth McCuaig; Chris Arthur; Thomas Carins; Adam Morton; Josephine Laurie; Teresa Neeman; Boon Lim; Michael J Peek
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2018-10-25

10.  Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: observational study of the treatment with low-dose ursodeoxycholic acid.

Authors:  Titta Joutsiniemi; Susanna Timonen; Maria Linden; Pia Suvitie; Ulla Ekblad
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.