Literature DB >> 31283001

Total serum bile acids or serum bile acid profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Cristina Manzotti1, Giovanni Casazza, Tea Stimac, Dimitrinka Nikolova, Christian Gluud.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is a pregnancy-specific liver disorder, possibly associated with an increased risk of severe fetal adverse events. Total serum bile acids (TSBA) concentration, alone or in combination with serum aminotransferases, have been the most often used biomarkers for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in clinical practice. Serum bile acid profile, composed of primary or secondary, conjugated or non-conjugated bile acids, may provide more specific disease information.
OBJECTIVES: To assess and compare, independently or in combination, the diagnostic accuracy of total serum bile acids or serum bile acids profile, or both, for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in pregnant women, presenting with pruritus. To define the optimal cut-off values for components of serum bile acid profile; to investigate possible sources of heterogeneity. SEARCH
METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies Register, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, Science Citation Index Expanded, Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science, BIOSIS, CINAHL, two Chinese databases (CKNI, VIP), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), Evidence Search: Health and Social Care by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the World Health Organization (WHO) Reproductive Health Library (RHL), and the Turning Research into Practice database (TRIP). The most recent date of search was 6 May 2019. We identified additional references by handsearching the references of articles, meta-analyses, and evidence-based guidelines retrieved from the computerised databases, on-line trial registries, and grey literature through OpenSIGLE, National Technical Information Service (NTIS), ProQuest Dissertations & Thesis Database, and Index to Theses in Great Britain and Ireland. SELECTION CRITERIA: Prospective or retrospective diagnostic case-control or cross-sectional studies, irrespective of publication date, format, and language, which evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of total serum bile acids (TSBA) or components of serum bile acid profile for the diagnosis of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy in pregnant women of any age or ethnicity, in any clinical setting, symptomatic for pruritus. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We selected studies by reading titles, abstracts, or full texts, and assessing their fulfilment of our inclusion criteria. We emailed primary authors to request missing data or individual participant data. Having extracted data from each included study, we built the two-by-two tables for each primary study and for all the index tests considered. We estimated sensitivity and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). We presented data in coupled forest plots, showing sensitivities and specificities of each study, and we plotted the studies in the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) space. We performed meta-analyses adopting the hierarchical summary ROC model (HSROC) or the bivariate model to meta-analyse the data. We made indirect comparisons of the considered index tests by adding the index tests as covariates to the bivariate or HSROC models. We performed heterogeneity analysis and sensitivity analysis on studies assessing TSBA accuracy. We used Review Manager 5 (RevMan 5) and SAS statistical software, release 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), to perform all statistical analyses. We used QUADAS-2 domains to assess the risk of bias of the included studies. MAIN
RESULTS: Our search yielded 5073 references, but at the end of our selection process, only 16 studies fulfilled the review inclusion criteria. Nine of these provided individual participant data. We analysed only data concerning TSBA, cholic acid (CA), glycocholic acid (GCA), chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA), and CA/CDCA because the remaining planned index tests were assessed in few studies. Only one study had low risk of bias in all four QUADAS-2 domains. The most biased domains were the patient sampling and the reference standard domains. When considering all studies with a cut-off of 10 μmol/L, TSBA overall sensitivity ranged from 0.72 to 0.98 and specificity ranged from 0.81 to 0.97. After a sensitivity analysis excluding case-control studies, TSBA sensitivity ranged from 0.48 to 0.66 and specificity from 0.52 to 0.99. After a sensitivity analysis excluding studies in which TSBA was part of the reference standard, TSBA sensitivity ranged from 0.49 to 0.65 and specificity from 0.53 to 0.99. We found the estimates of the overall accuracy for some serum bile acid components (CA, GCA, CDCA, and CA/CDCA) to be imprecise, with the CI for sensitivity and specificity very wide or impossible to calculate. Indirect comparisons between serum bile acid profile components and TSBA were not statistically significant. None of the heterogeneity analysis performed was statistically significant, except for the timing of assessment of TSBA (onset of symptoms, peak value among multiple assessments, delivery) but without clinically relevant results. We could not analyse the diagnostic accuracy of combinations of index tests because none of the included studies carried them out, and because of the small number of included studies. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The overall high risk of bias, the existing concern regarding applicability of the results in clinical practice, and the great heterogeneity of the results in the included studies prevents us from making recommendations and reaching definitive conclusions at the present time. Thus, we do not find any compelling evidence to recommend or refute the routine use of any of these tests in clinical practice. So far, the diagnostic accuracy of TSBA for intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy might have been overestimated. There were too few studies to permit a precise estimate of the accuracy of serum bile acid profile components. Further primary clinical research is mandatory. We need both further phase II and phase III diagnostic studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31283001      PMCID: PMC6613619          DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012546.pub2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  120 in total

1.  [Development of pruritus in cholestasis of pregnancy and its relation to the serum concentration of bile acids].

Authors:  J Chianale; J C Glasinovic; J López; I Marinovic; P Vela; E Ahumada; M T Valdivia; X Gómez
Journal:  Rev Med Chil       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 0.553

2.  The bile acid taurocholate impairs rat cardiomyocyte function: a proposed mechanism for intra-uterine fetal death in obstetric cholestasis.

Authors:  C Williamson; J Gorelik; B M Eaton; M Lab; M de Swiet; Y Korchev
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.124

3.  Reproductive endocrinology: maternal cholestasis and offspring metabolic abnormalities.

Authors:  Mina Desai; Michael G Ross
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Bile acid profiles in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: is this the solution to the enigma of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy?

Authors:  Emmanouil Sinakos; Keith D Lindor
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 5.  Interventions for treating cholestasis in pregnancy.

Authors:  Vinita Gurung; Philippa Middleton; Stephen J Milan; William Hague; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-24

Review 6.  Efficacy of ursodeoxycholic acid in treating intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yannick Bacq; Loïc Sentilhes; Humberto B Reyes; Anna Glantz; Jurate Kondrackiene; Tomas Binder; Pier Luigi Nicastri; Anna Locatelli; Annarosa Floreani; Ismael Hernandez; Vincent Di Martino
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2012-08-11       Impact factor: 22.682

7.  The metabolic profile of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy is associated with impaired glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, and increased fetal growth.

Authors:  Marcus G Martineau; Christina Raker; Peter H Dixon; Jenny Chambers; Mavis Machirori; Nicole M King; Melissa L Hooks; Ramya Manoharan; Kenneth Chen; Raymond Powrie; Catherine Williamson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  A prospective study of 18 patients with cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  D Shaw; J Frohlich; B A Wittmann; M Willms
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1982-03-15       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Prognostic and mechanistic potential of progesterone sulfates in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy and pruritus gravidarum.

Authors:  Shadi Abu-Hayyeh; Caroline Ovadia; TinaMarie Lieu; Dane D Jensen; Jenny Chambers; Peter H Dixon; Anita Lövgren-Sandblom; Ruth Bolier; Dagmar Tolenaars; Andreas E Kremer; Argyro Syngelaki; Muna Noori; David Williams; Jose J G Marin; Maria J Monte; Kypros H Nicolaides; Ulrich Beuers; Ronald Oude-Elferink; Paul T Seed; Lucy Chappell; Hanns-Ulrich Marschall; Nigel W Bunnett; Catherine Williamson
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Association of adverse perinatal outcomes of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy with biochemical markers: results of aggregate and individual patient data meta-analyses.

Authors:  Caroline Ovadia; Paul T Seed; Alexandros Sklavounos; Victoria Geenes; Chiara Di Ilio; Jenny Chambers; Katherine Kohari; Yannick Bacq; Nuray Bozkurt; Romana Brun-Furrer; Laura Bull; Maria C Estiú; Monika Grymowicz; Berrin Gunaydin; William M Hague; Christian Haslinger; Yayi Hu; Tetsuya Kawakita; Ayse G Kebapcilar; Levent Kebapcilar; Jūratė Kondrackienė; Maria P H Koster; Aneta Kowalska-Kańka; Limas Kupčinskas; Richard H Lee; Anna Locatelli; Rocio I R Macias; Hanns-Ulrich Marschall; Martijn A Oudijk; Yael Raz; Eli Rimon; Dan Shan; Yong Shao; Rachel Tribe; Valeria Tripodi; Cigdem Yayla Abide; Ilter Yenidede; Jim G Thornton; Lucy C Chappell; Catherine Williamson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 202.731

View more
  15 in total

1.  Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy: machine-learning algorithm to predict elevated bile acid based on clinical and laboratory data.

Authors:  Aula Asali; Dorit Ravid; Hila Shalev; Liron David; Eran Yogev; Sabina Sapunar Yogev; Ron Schonman; Tal Biron-Shental; Netanella Miller
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.344

2.  Efficacy of fetal left ventricular modified myocardial performance index in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes in intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

Authors:  Koray Gök; Taha Takmaz; Osman Köse; Bilge Kapudere; Nevin Tüten; Mehmet Sühha Bostancı; Selçuk Özden
Journal:  Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992)       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.712

3.  Predictive Value of Serum Cholic Acid and Lithocholic Acid for the Diagnosis in an Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy Population with High Levels of Total Bile Acids and the Correlation with Placental Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α.

Authors:  Chu-Yun Cheng; Guan-Yin Zeng; Tong Wang; Yan-Hua Su; Feng-Dan Xu; Hong Luo; Hui-Ting Zhong; Xiu-Lan Chen
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2022-05-09

4.  Deep Learning Algorithm-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Feature-Guided Serum Bile Acid Profile and Perinatal Outcomes in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Hongxue Liu; Haidong Wang; Muling Zhang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 2.809

5.  Value of Serum Glycocholic Acid and Total Bile Acids in Predicting Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes in Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy.

Authors:  Chong Fu; Yali Xu
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 2.682

Review 6.  Bile Acid Detection Techniques and Bile Acid-Related Diseases.

Authors:  Xiang Zhao; Zitian Liu; Fuyun Sun; Lunjin Yao; Guangwei Yang; Kexin Wang
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  Oral herbal medicine for women with intrahepatic cholestasis in pregnancy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ruiting Wang; Nuo Cheng; Rongyan Peng; Zeyu Yu; Mengdie Nan; Huijuan Cao
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2020-10-07

8.  Impact on Bile Acid Concentrations by Alveolar Echinococcosis and Treatment with Albendazole in Mice.

Authors:  Cristina Gómez; Fadi Jebbawi; Michael Weingartner; Junhua Wang; Simon Stücheli; Bruno Stieger; Bruno Gottstein; Guido Beldi; Britta Lundström-Stadelmann; Alex Odermatt
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2021-07-06

9.  Studies on Novel Diagnostic and Predictive Biomarkers of Intrahepatic Cholestasis of Pregnancy Through Metabolomics and Proteomics.

Authors:  Ruirui Dong; Ningzhen Ye; Shaojie Zhao; Gaoying Wang; Yan Zhang; Tiejun Wang; Ping Zou; Jing Wang; Tingting Yao; Minjian Chen; Conghua Zhou; Ting Zhang; Liang Luo
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Association of Elevated Maternal Serum Total Bile Acids With Low Birth Weight and Intrauterine Fetal Growth Restriction.

Authors:  Fuzhen Song; Yuanyuan Chen; Lei Chen; Huan Li; Xiajin Cheng; Weibin Wu
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.