| Literature DB >> 25685399 |
Mahmoud Chamsaz1, Atefe Atarodi1, Mohammad Eftekhari1, Saeid Asadpour1, Mina Adibi2.
Abstract
A simple and rapid vortex assisted ionic liquid based liquid-liquid microextraction technique (VALLME) was proposed for preconcentration of trace levels of cadmium. According to this method, the extraction solvent was dispersed into the aqueous samples by the assistance of vortex agitator. Cadmium preconcentration was mediated by chelation with the 8-hydroxyquinoline (oxine) reagent and an IL, 1-octyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([Omim][PF6]) was chosen as the extraction solvent to extract the hydrophobic complex. Several variables such as sample pH, concentration of oxine, volume of [Omim][PF6] and extraction time were investigated in details and optimum conditions were selected. Under the optimum conditions, the limit of detection (LOD) was 2.9 μg L(-1) for Cd (ІІ) and relative standard deviation (RSD%) for five replicate determinations of 125 μg L(-1) was 4.1%. The method was successfully applied to the determination of cadmium in tap water, apple and rice samples.Entities:
Keywords: Cadmium; Flame atomic absorption spectrometry; Ionic liquid; Microextraction; Oxine; Preconcentration
Year: 2012 PMID: 25685399 PMCID: PMC4195451 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2011.12.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Fig. 1Effect of pH on the recovery of cadmium. Conditions: 100 μg L−1 Cd2+, 2.7 × 10−4 mol L−1 of oxine, 70 μL ([Omim][PF6]), extraction time 6 min.
Fig. 2Effect of oxine concentration on the recovery factor. Conditions: pH:11, 100 μg L−1 Cd2+, 70 μL ([Omim][PF6]), extraction time 6 min.
Fig. 3Effect of amounts of RTIL on the recovery factor. Conditions: pH:11, 100 μg L−1 Cd2+, 1.35 × 10−4 mol L−1 of oxine, extraction time 6 min.
Fig. 4Effect of extraction time on the recovery factor. Conditions: pH:11, 100 μg L−1 Cd2+, 1.35 × 10−4 mol L−1 of oxine, 60 μL ([Omim][PF6]).
Effect of diverse ions on the determination of 100 μg L−1 of cadmium.
| Coexisting ions | Molar ratio (ion/cadmium) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Cl− | 3000 | 99 |
| 2000 | 97.5 | |
| 1800 | 98.4 | |
| 1000 | 97.5 | |
| Na+ | 4000 | 101.8 |
| K+ | 3000 | 97.3 |
| Co2+ | 2000 | 98 |
| Cr3+, Mn2+ | 1800 | 96 |
| Mg2+ | 1500 | 96.5 |
| Ca2+ | 1500 | 97.2 |
| Ba2+ | 1000 | 96.7 |
| Pb2+ | 50 | 98.3 |
| Fe2+ | 20 | 96 |
| Zn2+ | 10 | 96 |
| Cu2+ | 10 | 96.8 |
| Ni2+ | 10 | 97 |
Results (mean ± standard deviation based on three replicate analysis) of determination of cadmium in real sample.
| Sample | Spiked (ng mL−1) | Found (ng mL−1) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tap water | 0 | ND | – |
| 30 | 31.7 ± 0.5 | 106 | |
| 50 | 51.7 ± 0.7 | 103 | |
| Rice sample | 0 | 15 ± 0.4 | – |
| 50 | 57 ± 0.9 | 88 | |
| 70 | 79 ± 1.5 | 93 | |
| Apple sample | 0 | ND | – |
| 70 | 71.5 ± 1.3 | 102.4 | |
Not detected.
Obtained from Mashhad.
Determination of cadmium in a certified reference material. Results (mean ± standard deviation based on three replicate analysis).
| Sample | Certified (μg g−1) | Found (μg g−1) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERM®-ER325 | 94.7 ± 2.5 | 92.1 ± 1.9 | 97.2 |
Comparison of VALLME with other methods for determination of cadmium.
| Method | LOD (μg L−1) | RSD (%) | EF | Calibration range (μg L−1) | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solid phase extraction | 1.44 | ⩽3 | - | 216–3000 | |
| Solid phase extraction | 5.50 | 2.3 | - | 5–150 | |
| Hollow fiber membrane | 1.5 | 4 | 107 | 5–30 | |
| Liquid phase Microextraction | |||||
| Ultrasound-assisted | 0.91 | 1.62–2.56 | 13.4 | 10–600 | |
| emulsification–microextraction | |||||
| Ultrasound-Assisted | 0.66 | 2.42–3.34 | 15 | 10–450 | |
| emulsification solidified-microextraction | |||||
| Dispersive liquid–liquid | 1.16 | 1.8 | 48.1 | 4–200 | |
| Microextraction (DLLME) | |||||
| VALLME | 2.9 | 4.1 | 35 | 10–250 | This work |
Limit of detection.
Relative standard deviation.
Enhancement factor.