Literature DB >> 25681488

Developing effective automated feedback in temporal bone surgery simulation.

Sudanthi Wijewickrema1, Patorn Piromchai2, Yun Zhou3, Ioanna Ioannou2, James Bailey3, Gregor Kennedy4, Stephen O'Leary2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We aim to test the effectiveness, accuracy, and usefulness of an automated feedback system in facilitating skill acquisition in virtual reality surgery. STUDY
DESIGN: We evaluate the performance of the feedback system through a randomized controlled trial of 24 students allocated to feedback and nonfeedback groups.
SETTING: The feedback system was based on the Melbourne University temporal bone surgery simulator. The study was conducted at the simulation laboratory of the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The study participants were medical students from the University of Melbourne, who were asked to perform virtual cortical mastoidectomy on the simulator. The extent to which the drilling behavior of the feedback and nonfeedback groups differed was used to evaluate the effectiveness of the system. Its accuracy was determined through a postexperiment observational assessment of recordings made during the experiment by an expert surgeon. Its usability was evaluated using students' self-reports of their impressions of the system.
RESULTS: A Friedman's test showed that there was a significant improvement in the drilling performance of the feedback group, χ(2)(1) = 14.450, P < .001. The postexperiment assessment demonstrated that the system provided timely feedback (when trainee behavior was detected) 88.6% of the time and appropriate feedback (accurate advice) 84.2% of the time. Participants' opinions about the usefulness of the system were highly positive.
CONCLUSION: The automated feedback system was observed to be effective in improving surgical technique, and the provided feedback was found to be accurate and useful. © American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery Foundation 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  automated feedback in surgery simulation; simulation-based surgical training; virtual reality temporal bone surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25681488     DOI: 10.1177/0194599815570880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  7 in total

Review 1.  Otologic Skills Training.

Authors:  Gregory J Wiet; Mads Sølvsten Sørensen; Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Computer-Aided Design and 3-Dimensional Printing for Costal Cartilage Simulation of Airway Graft Carving.

Authors:  Jennifer F Ha; Robert J Morrison; Glenn E Green; David A Zopf
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 3.  Performance Assessment for Mastoidectomy.

Authors:  Rishabh Sethia; Thomas F Kerwin; Gregory J Wiet
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 4.  Preoperative preparation for otologic surgery: temporal bone simulation.

Authors:  Rishabh Sethia; Gregory J Wiet
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 5.  Feedback in an Epidemic?

Authors:  Amr Taha
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-08

6.  The Applications of Virtual Reality Technology in Medical Groups Teaching.

Authors:  Mahnaz Samadbeik; Donya Yaaghobi; Peivand Bastani; Shahabeddin Abhari; Rita Rezaee; Ali Garavand
Journal:  J Adv Med Educ Prof       Date:  2018-07

7.  Virtual Reality in Medical Students' Education: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Haowen Jiang; Sunitha Vimalesvaran; Jeremy King Wang; Kee Boon Lim; Sreenivasulu Reddy Mogali; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  JMIR Med Educ       Date:  2022-02-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.