Literature DB >> 25678900

Relationship between red blood cell distribution width and intermediate-term mortality in elderly patients after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Xin-Min Liu1, Chang-Sheng Ma1, Xiao-Hui Liu1, Xin Du1, Jun-Ping Kang1, Yin Zhang1, Jia-Hui Wu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Large-scale clinical research on the relationship between red blood cell distribution width (RDW) and intermediate-term prognosis in elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is lacking. Thus, this study investigated the effects of RDW on the intermediate-term mortality of elderly patients who underwent elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
METHODS: Data from 1891 patients ≥ 65 years old underwent elective PCI from July 2009 to September 2011 were collected. Based on preoperative median RDW (12.3%), the patients were divided into two groups. The low RDW group (RDW < 12.3%) had 899 cases; the high RDW group (RDW ≥ 12.3%) had 992 cases. The all-cause mortality rates of the two groups were compared.
RESULTS: Patients in the high RDW group were more likely to be female and accompanied with diabetes, had lower hemoglobin level. The mean follow-up period was 527 days. During follow-up, 61 patients died (3.2%). The postoperative mortality of the high RDW group was significantly higher than that of the low RDW group (4.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.004). After adjusting other factors, multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that preoperative high RDW was significantly associated with postoperative all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 2.301, 95% confidence interval: 1.106-4.785, P = 0.026).
CONCLUSIONS: Increased RDW was an independent predictor of the increased intermediate-term all-cause mortality in elderly CAD patients after elective PCI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary artery disease; Elderly patients; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Red blood cell distribution width

Year:  2015        PMID: 25678900      PMCID: PMC4308454          DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol        ISSN: 1671-5411            Impact factor:   3.327


Introduction

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been widely used in treating elderly patients with coronary artery disease (CAD); clinical studies have confirmed the safety and efficacy of this treatment towards these patients.[1]–[5] Given the special systemic conditions of elderly CAD patients, as well as the complexity of CAD, their revascularisation strategies and prognosis differ from those of young patients.[6] Thus, clinicians should perform accurate risk stratification and prognosis assessment in elderly CAD patients to identify the high-risk group. As an intrinsic parameter in blood tests, red blood cell distribution width (RDW) was initially only used in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of anemia. In 2007, Felker, et al.[7] firstly discovered that increasing RDW is an independent predictor for the prognosis of heart failure patients, and researchers gradually discovered that RDW is closely associated with the prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. Recent studies showed that increasing RDW is not only a predictor for poor prognosis of heart failure,[7],[8] CAD,[9]–[11] and pulmonary hypertension,[12],[13] but it also exhibits a predictive value towards the prognosis of stable CAD patients who have underwent PCI therapy.[14],[15] As of this writing, research on the effects of RDW on the prognosis of elderly CAD patients after PCI treatment is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to clarify the relationship between RDW and intermediate-term all-cause mortality of elderly CAD patients after elective PCI therapy.

Methods

Study group

Among 3574 CAD cases who underwent PCI treatment and had preoperative RDW records in the Beijing Anzhen Hospital from July 2009 to September 2011, 1891 patients aged ≥ 65 years old who underwent elective PCI were selected in this study. Indications for PCI were objective evidence of myocardial ischemia (positive sign on stress test) or ischemic symptoms associated with significant angiographic stenosis (> 75% stenosis). Patients who underwent haemodialysis were excluded, and fasting blood specimens were sampled in the morning prior to PCI. The patients' demographic data, clinical features, laboratory tests, medications, angiographic and procedural information during hospitalisation were recorded.

Classification of RDW

Based on the preoperative median of RDW (12.3%), the patients were divided into two groups: the high RDW group (RDW ≥ 12.3) and the low RDW group (RDW < 12.3).

Data source and clinical outcomes

Research-related original data were collected from the hospital's standard medical records. Laboratory tests and ECG data included records from the time of admission to the time prior to procedure. Data input and follow-up were all completed by cardiologists. Clinic service or telephone follow-up was performed according to a pre-designed questionnaire. The follow-up data were input into a unified form and then encoded into the computer database. The endpoint of this study was the occurrence of all-cause mortality after PCI. The mean follow-up time was 527 days, and the follow-up rate was 92.1%.

Statistical analysis

Continuous variables were presented as the mean and standard deviation. Inter-group comparison of continuous variables was performed using the Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U-test, whereas categorical variables were analysed using chi-square test or Fisher's exact test. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to compare cumulative survival between the two groups using the log-rank test. Cox regression equation was used to statistically analyse the relevant factors affecting all-cause mortality. Univariate model included the following variables: high RDW, age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, current smoking, family history of CAD, previous stroke, previous myocardial infarction, previous PCI, ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), hemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), triglyceride, multivessel disease, number of PCI vessels and baseline medications. As covariates for adjustment, those factors were chosen which were found to have a P-value lower than 0.2 in univariate analyses of death. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of each relevant factor were calculated. All statistical test were two-tailed, statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. All data were analysed using SPSS 13.0 statistical software.

Results

Baseline characteristics

The baseline clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age was 68.1 years old and 33.8% of patients were female. The high RDW group was more often accompanied with diabetes, and the proportion of female patients was higher than that of the low RDW group. Patients with high RDW had lower hemoglobin level. No significant difference was found in age, body mass index (BMI), hypertension, current smoking, family history of CAD, previous stroke, previous myocardial infarction, previous PCI, clinical presentation, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, LVEF, white blood cells, haematocrit, eGFR, total cholesterol, LDL-C, triglyceride, fasting glucose, number of diseased vessels and number of PCI vessels between the two groups. There were no significant differences in baseline medications between the two groups (Table 2).
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics.

RDW < 12.3 (n = 899)RDW ≥ 12.3 (n = 992)P value
Age, yrs67.8 ± 5.368.5 ± 5.40.644
Female276 (30.7)363 (36.6)0.007
BMI, kg/m225.6 ± 3.225.4 ± 3.10.573
Hypertension604 (67.2)681 (68.6)0.496
Diabetes210 (23.4)289 (29.1)0.004
Current smoking421 (46.8)441 (44.5)0.301
Family history of CAD33 (3.7)40 (4.0)0.684
Previous stroke94 (10.5)121 (12.2)0.234
Previous myocardial infarction159 (17.7)186 (18.8)0.550
Previous PCI81 (9.0)104 (10.5)0.281
Clinical presentation
STEMI160 (17.8)170 (17.1)0.706
NSTEMI47 (5.2)47 (4.7)0.624
Unstable angina531 (59.1)586 (59.1)0.998
Stable angina161 (17.9)189 (19.1)0.523
Systolic pressure, mmHg131.6 ± 20.7132.0 ± 20.50.515
Diastolic pressure, mmHg77.3 ± 10.677.6 ± 10.60.867
LVEF, %61.5 ± 11.259.9 ± 11.40.953
WBC, 109/L7.2 ± 2.27.2 ± 2.10.101
HCT, %38.1 ±4.141.2±3.80.061
Hemoglobin, g/L136.4 ± 15.6132.4 ± 16.6<0.001
eGFR, mL · min−1 · 1.73 m−280.4 ± 27.379.2 ± 23.20.206
Total cholesterol, mmol/L4.62 ± 0.974.66 ± 1.030.369
LDL-C, mmol/L2.69 ± 0.802.68 ± 0.790.914
Triglyceride, mmol/L1.82 ± 1.171.82 ± 1.140.752
Glucose, mmol/L5.93 ± 2.016.08 ± 2.200.050
Number of diseased vessels
 1-vessel disease332 (36.9)370 (37.3)0.868
 2-vessel disease321 (35.7)364 (36.7)0.656
 3-vessel disease246 (27.4)258 (26.0)0.506
Number of PCI vessels1.5 ± 0.61.4 ± 0.60.469

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HCT: haematocrit; LDL-C: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; NSTEMI: non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RDW: red blood cell distribution width; STEMI: ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; WBC: white blood cells.

Table 2.

Baseline medication.

RDW < 12.3 (n = 899)RDW ≥ 12.3 (n = 992)P value
DAPT888 (98.8)973 (98.1)0.229
Βeta-blocker764 (85.0)870 (87.7)0.085
Statins782 (87.0)838 (84.5)0.120
ACEI/ARB585 (65.1)646 (65.1)0.982

Data are presented as n (%). ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; RDW: red blood cell distribution width.

Data are presented as mean ± SD or n (%). BMI: body mass index; CAD: coronary artery disease; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; HCT: haematocrit; LDL-C: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; NSTEMI: non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RDW: red blood cell distribution width; STEMI: ST segment elevation myocardial infarction; WBC: white blood cells. Data are presented as n (%). ACEI: angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; RDW: red blood cell distribution width.

Clinical outcomes

The mean follow-up period was 527 days, and the follow-up rate was 92.1%. During the follow up period, 61 patients died (43 cases in the high RDW group and 18 cases in the low RDW group). The mortality of the high RDW group was significantly higher than that of the low RDW group (4.3% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.004). Results of univariate analyses for all-cause death are shown in Table 3. In multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling, high RDW was significantly associated with an increased incidence of all-cause death (HR: 2.301, 95%CI: 1.106–4.785, P = 0.026) (Table 4). The cumulative incidence of all-cause death was significantly higher in the high RDW group than in the low RDW group (P = 0.009, Figure 1).
Table 3.

Univariate analysis for all–cause mortality.

HR95%CIP value
High RDW2.0521.182–3.5610.011
Age1.0531.007–1.1010.023
Gender (female)1.4680.884–2.4390.138
Hypertension1.4430.861–2.4200.164
Diabetes1.8831.279–2.7720.001
Previous stroke1.1970.569–2.5180.635
Previous myocardial infarction1.2000.650–2.2150.559
Previous PCI0.4870.153–1.5560.225
Current smoking1.0690.869–1.3160.529
Family history of CAD1.3290.416–4.2500.631
STEMI1.5511.097–2.1930.013
LVEF0.9740.955–0.9950.014
Hemoglobin0.9730.959–0.988<0.001
eGFR (mL · min−1 · 1.73 m−2)0.9770.964–0.989<0.001
Total Cholesterol1.0030.997–1.0100.305
LDL–C1.0040.996–1.0120.341
Triglyceride0.9990.996–1.0030.726
Multivessel disease1.7091.235–2.3660.001
Number of PCI vessels1.3270.935–1.8830.114
DAPT0.8770.221–6.3280.896
Use of β–blocker0.5500.298–1.0160.056
Use of statins0.6770.360–1.2720.225
Use of ACEI/ARB0.8980.485–1.6660.734

ACEI: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; CAD: coronary artery disease; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LDL–C: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RDW: red blood cell distribution width; STEMI: ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Table 4.

Multivariate analysis for all-cause mortality.

HR95%CIP value
Diabetes2.3111.392–3.8370.001
High RDW2.3011.106–4.7850.026
eGFR0.9710.955–0.987< 0.001
Multivessel disease1.9161.233–2.9770.004

RDW: red blood cell distribution width; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Figure 1.

The Kaplan-Meier curve for cumulative survival.

RDW: red blood cell distribution width.

Discussion

Two conclusions could be drawn from the results of this study. Firstly, the patients with increased RDW were more often accompanied with diabetes, and the proportion of females was higher, had lower hemoglobin level. Secondly, after adjusting other factors, the increase in RDW was the independent predictor for the elevated mortality of elderly CAD patients after elective PCI, and the postoperative mortality of the high RDW group was almost 2.2 times higher than that of the low RDW group. The similar conclusion of the study also found in other studies. Considering that RDW detection is simple, easy and comes with no additional costs, this method could become a new indicator for the prognostic evaluation and risk stratification of elderly CAD patients. ACEI: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor; ARB: angiotensin receptor blocker; CAD: coronary artery disease; DAPT: dual antiplatelet therapy; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; LDL–C: Low density lipoprotein cholesterol; PCI: percutaneous coronary intervention; RDW: red blood cell distribution width; STEMI: ST segment elevation myocardial infarction.

The Kaplan-Meier curve for cumulative survival.

RDW: red blood cell distribution width. RDW: red blood cell distribution width; eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate. Previous studies suggested that the increase in RDW can lead to increased mortality after PCI. Osadnik, et al.[14] enrolled 2550 cases of stable CAD patients who underwent PCI treatment. Based on the RDW levels at baseline, the patients were divided into four groups; the 2.5 years follow-up found that the corrected risk of death of the group with the highest RDW (≥ 14.1%) was fourfold than that of the group with the lowest RDW (< 13.1%) (17.1% vs. 4.3%, P < 0.0001). Tsuboi, et al.[15] investigated 560 stable CAD cases who had underwent PCI treatment and were accompanied with diabetes, among which 322 cases were aged > 65 years old, and the 3.9 years follow-up found that the death risk rate of the high RDW group (13.3%–14.2%) was higher than that of the low RDW group (12.4%– 12.9%, HR: 2.56, 95%CI: 1.12–6.62, P = 0.025). Considering that the above subjects not only included patients aged > 65 years old, the relationship between RDW and prognosis of elderly PCI patient remains unclear. The current study analysed a large sample of PCI patients aged ≥ 65 years old, and the high RDW group had a higher ratio of accompanying diabetes and female proportion, lower hemoglobin level. Many clinical studies showed that diabetes and low hemoglobin are independent predictors of poor prognosis for CAD patients after PCI.[16]–[19] Poor clinical outcomes of elderly diabetic patients are caused by multifaceted reasons, including atherosclerotic overloading, microvascular disease, prothrombotic state, excessive intimal hyperplasia, vascular inflammation, organ dysfunction and several other complications.[20]–[26] Some studies suggested that more adverse events occur in females than those in males after PCI, whereas other studies demonstrated that the incidence of adverse events has no gender differences.[27]–[31] After adjusting the related factors, the increase in RDW was an independent predictor for the increased mortality of elderly CAD patients after PCI. The exact mechanism of the relationship between RDW and prognosis of cardiovascular diseases remains unclear. Data analysis of the America third national health and nutrition examination survey demonstrated that the C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen level and white blood cell count were closely related to increasing RDW.[32] Lippi, et al.[33] discovered the relationship between high RDW and elevated inflammatory markers, which involved the association with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and CRP, and this contact was independent from other concomitant diseases. When the blood diseases were excluded, this contact was also present. The CRP is an independent risk factor for CAD, and elevated levels of CRP are positively correlated with the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events.[34]–[36] CRP as a well-established biomarker of inflammation, has been available and useful for predicting future cardiovascular events in clinical practice. Studies showed that the elevated neutral/lymphocyte ratio, which is a direct indicator of inflammation, is highly correlated with the RDW level; therefore, RDW can be considered an inflammatory factor.[37] As a classic inflammatory cytokine, IL-6 is closely related to the elevation of RDW.[38] IL-6 is a powerful inducer of hepcidin gene transcription; an increase in IL-6 can reduce iron and result in increased RDW.[39] IL-6 is a multifunctional cytokine that plays an important role in the process of vascular injury in CAD, and has become an important marker for the stability of coronary atherosclerotic plaques, which are mainly developed by promoting platelet aggregation, enhancing the expression of reactive protein and fibrinogen and adjusting the expression of other inflammatory factors; thus, IL-6 is involved in the inflammatory process of unstable plaques.[40] The predictive roles of RDW in the prognosis of cardiovascular diseases might reflect the predictive roles of inflammation for the same prognosis.

Study limitations

Some limitation of the present study must be considered. This was a single center, retrospective study. Residual confounding factors possibly affected the results, in addition to the lack of serum iron, folic acid, VitB12 status. Another limitation is that only intermediate-term follow-up results are available. Long-term follow-up is required to further verify the findings. Despite these limitations, the advantages of this study were its large sample size, detailed clinical data and laboratory indicators.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that high RDW is a predictive factor for all-cause mortality in elderly CAD patients after elective PCI. RDW had the potential to become a new indicator in prognostic evaluation and risk stratification of the elderly patients with coronary artery disease.
  37 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of red cell distribution width and high sensitivity C-reactive protein for coronary heart disease mortality prediction in multi-ethnic population: findings from the 1999-2004 NHANES.

Authors:  Vikas Veeranna; Sandip K Zalawadiya; Sidakpal Panaich; Kushang V Patel; Luis Afonso
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Impact of age on treatment and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Marc C Newell; Jason T Henry; Timothy D Henry; Sue Duval; Joseph A Browning; Ellen C Christiansen; David M Larson; Alan K Berger
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.749

3.  Excess mortality in women compared to men after PCI in STEMI: an analysis of 11,931 patients during 2000-2009.

Authors:  Sanneke P M de Boer; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Maarten A H van Leeuwen; Mattie J Lenzen; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Evelyn Regar; Nicolas M van Mieghem; Ron van Domburg; Felix Zijlstra; Patrick W Serruys; Eric Boersma
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  Association between red blood cell distribution width and outcomes at six months in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Sérgio Nabais; Nuno Losa; António Gaspar; Sérgia Rocha; João Costa; Pedro Azevedo; Luís Basto; Miguel Alvares Pereira; Adelino Correia
Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.374

5.  Validation and potential mechanisms of red cell distribution width as a prognostic marker in heart failure.

Authors:  Larry A Allen; G Michael Felker; Mandeep R Mehra; Jun R Chiong; Stephanie H Dunlap; Jalal K Ghali; Daniel J Lenihan; Ron M Oren; Lynne E Wagoner; Todd A Schwartz; Kirkwood F Adams
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 5.712

6.  Regulation of hepcidin transcription by interleukin-1 and interleukin-6.

Authors:  Pauline Lee; Hongfan Peng; Terri Gelbart; Lei Wang; Ernest Beutler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Contemporary outcome trends in the elderly undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: results in 7,472 octogenarians. National Cardiovascular Network Collaboration.

Authors:  W B Batchelor; K J Anstrom; L H Muhlbaier; R Grosswald; W S Weintraub; W W O'Neill; E D Peterson
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Baseline platelet activity and response after clopidogrel in 257 diabetics among 822 patients with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Victor Serebruany; Ilya Pokov; Wiktor Kuliczkowski; James Chesebro; Juan Badimon
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 5.249

9.  Usefulness of red cell distribution width as a prognostic marker in pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Chetan V Hampole; Amit K Mehrotra; Thenappan Thenappan; Mardi Gomberg-Maitland; Sanjiv J Shah
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.778

10.  Trends in the association between age and in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: National Cardiovascular Data Registry experience.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh; Eric D Peterson; Matthew T Roe; Fang-Shu Ou; John A Spertus; John S Rumsfeld; H Vernon Anderson; Lloyd W Klein; Kalon K L Ho; David R Holmes
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 6.546

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Prognostic Role of Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Coronary Artery Disease: A Review of the Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Kamil Bujak; Jarosław Wasilewski; Tadeusz Osadnik; Sandra Jonczyk; Aleksandra Kołodziejska; Marek Gierlotka; Mariusz Gąsior
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.434

2.  Association between RDW and stent thrombosis in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Abdullah Tunçez; Mehmet Serkan Çetin; Elif Hande Özcan Çetin; Samet Yilmaz; Ahmet Korkmaz; Fatih Mehmet Uçar
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Red blood cell distribution width as long-term prognostic markers in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Ting-Ting Wu; Ying-Ying Zheng; Xian-Geng Hou; Yi Yang; Xiang Ma; Yi-Tong Ma; Xiang Xie
Journal:  Lipids Health Dis       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 3.876

4.  Prognostic Impact of Red Cell Distribution Width on the Development of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy, Major Adverse Cardiac Events, and Mortality in Coronary Artery Disease Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Azka Latif; Muhammad Junaid Ahsan; Noman Lateef; Vikas Kapoor; Hafiz Muhammad Fazeel; Faryal Razzaq; Ahmad Iftikhar; Muhammad Zubair Ashfaq; Faiz Anwer; Mohsin Mirza; Amjad Kabach
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021

5.  Red blood cell distribution width is worthwhile when interpreted with other inflammatory markers.

Authors:  Mehmet Dogan; Ugur Kucuk; Omer Uz
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.327

6.  Hematological Parameters Improve Prediction of Mortality and Secondary Adverse Events in Coronary Angiography Patients: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Authors:  Crystel M Gijsberts; Hester M den Ruijter; Dominique P V de Kleijn; Albert Huisman; Maarten J Ten Berg; Richard H A van Wijk; Folkert W Asselbergs; Michiel Voskuil; Gerard Pasterkamp; Wouter W van Solinge; Imo E Hoefer
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.