Literature DB >> 24576523

Age and sex differences in inhospital complication rates and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: evidence from the NCDR(®).

Judith H Lichtman1, Yongfei Wang2, Sara B Jones3, Erica C Leifheit-Limson3, Leslee J Shaw4, Viola Vaccarino4, John S Rumsfeld5, Harlan M Krumholz6, Jeptha P Curtis7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older women experience higher complication rates and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) than men, but there is limited evidence about sex-based differences in outcomes among younger patients. We compared rates of complications and inhospital mortality by sex for younger and older PCI patients.
METHODS: A total of 1,079,751 hospital admissions for PCI were identified in the CathPCI Registry(®) from 2005 to 2008. Complication rates (general, bleeding, bleeding with transfusion, and vascular) and inhospital mortality after PCI were compared by sex and age (<55 and ≥55 years). Analyses were adjusted for demographic and clinical factors and stratified by PCI type (elective, urgent, or emergency).
RESULTS: Overall, 6% of patients experienced complications, and 1% died inhospital. Unadjusted complication rates were higher for women compared with men in both age groups. In risk-adjusted analyses, younger women (odds ratio 1.24, 95% CI 1.16-1.33) and older women (1.27, 1.09-1.47) were more likely to experience any complication than similarly aged men. The increased risk persisted across complication categories and PCI type. Within age groups, risk-adjusted mortality was marginally higher for young women (1.19, 1.00-1.41), but not for older women (1.03, 0.97-1.10). In analyses stratified by PCI type, young women had twice the mortality risk after an elective procedure as young men (2.04, 1.15-3.61).
CONCLUSIONS: Women, regardless of age, experience more complications after PCI than men; young women are at increased mortality risk after an elective PCI. Identifying strategies to reduce adverse outcomes, particularly for women younger than 55 years, is important.
Copyright © 2014 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24576523     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.11.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  23 in total

1.  Improving outcomes in older women?

Authors:  John A Dodson; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 2.  Preventing and Experiencing Ischemic Heart Disease as a Woman: State of the Science: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jean C McSweeney; Anne G Rosenfeld; Willie M Abel; Lynne T Braun; Lora E Burke; Stacie L Daugherty; Gerald F Fletcher; Martha Gulati; Laxmi S Mehta; Christina Pettey; Jane F Reckelhoff
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Sex-Based Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Complications Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The SILVER-AMI Study.

Authors:  Michael G Nanna; Alexandra M Hajduk; Harlan M Krumholz; Terrence E Murphy; Rachel P Dreyer; Karen P Alexander; Mary Geda; Sui Tsang; Francine K Welty; Basmah Safdar; Dharshan K Lakshminarayan; Sarwat I Chaudhry; John A Dodson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-14

Review 4.  Outcomes of New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Women with Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Subrata Kar
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Predictors of in-Hospital Mortality of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Undergoing Interventional Treatment. An Analysis of Data from the RO-STEMI Registry.

Authors:  Diana E Cretu; Cristian A Udroiu; Claudiu I Stoicescu; Gabriel Tatu-Chitoiu; Dragos Vinereanu
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2015-09

6.  Temporal changes in outcomes of women and men undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion: 2005-2013.

Authors:  Aurel Toma; Barbara E Stähli; Michael Gick; Miroslaw Ferenc; Kambis Mashayekhi; Heinz Joachim Buettner; Franz-Josef Neumann; Catherine Gebhard
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 7.  Prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in heart failure: the growing evidence for all or Primum non nocere for some?

Authors:  Khang-Li Looi; Nigel Lever; Anthony Tang; Sharad Agarwal
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  Biopsychosocial health disparities among young women enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation.

Authors:  Theresa M Beckie; Gerald Fletcher; Maureen W Groer; Kevin E Kip; Ming Ji
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.081

9.  Sex Differences in Outcomes After STEMI: Effect Modification by Treatment Strategy and Age.

Authors:  Edina Cenko; Jinsung Yoon; Sasko Kedev; Goran Stankovic; Zorana Vasiljevic; Gordana Krljanac; Oliver Kalpak; Beatrice Ricci; Davor Milicic; Olivia Manfrini; Mihaela van der Schaar; Lina Badimon; Raffaele Bugiardini
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Gender differences in acute myocardial infarction-A nationwide German real-life analysis from 2014 to 2017.

Authors:  Leonie Kuehnemund; Jeanette Koeppe; Jannik Feld; Achim Wiederhold; Julia Illner; Lena Makowski; Joachim Gerß; Holger Reinecke; Eva Freisinger
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.