BACKGROUND:Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP], St. Jude Medical) improves acute LV function and LV reverse remodeling at 3 months. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MPP can also improve LV function at 12 months. METHODS:Consecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT-D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical) were randomized to receive pressure-volume (PV) loop optimized biventricular pacing with either conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CONV) or MPP. CRT response was defined by a reduction in end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥15% relative to BASELINE as determined by a blinded observer and alive status. RESULTS:Forty-four patients (New York Heart Association class III, ejection fraction [EF] 29% ± 6%, QRS 152 ± 17 ms) were enrolled and randomized to either CONV (N = 22) or MPP (N = 22). During the observation period, 2 patients died of noncardiac causes and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. After 12 months, 12 of 21 patients (57%) in the CONV group and 16 of 21 patients (76%) in the MPP group were classified as CRT responders (P = .33). ESV reduction and EF increase relative to BASELINE were significantly greater with MPP than with CONV (ESV: median -25%, interquartile range [IQR] [-39% to -20%] vs median -18%, IQR [-25% to -2%], P = .03; EF: median +15%, IQR [8% to 20%] vs median +5%, IQR [-1% to 8%], P <.001). CONCLUSION: Sustaining the trend observed 3 months postimplant, PV loop-guided multipoint LV pacing resulted in greater LV reverse remodeling and increased LV function at 12 months compared to PV loop-guided conventional CRT.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with multipoint left ventricular (LV) pacing (MultiPoint™ Pacing [MPP], St. Jude Medical) improves acute LV function and LV reverse remodeling at 3 months. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that MPP can also improve LV function at 12 months. METHODS: Consecutive patients receiving a CRT implant (Unify Quadra MP™ or Quadra Assura MP™ CRT-D and Quartet™ LV lead, St. Jude Medical) were randomized to receive pressure-volume (PV) loop optimized biventricular pacing with either conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CONV) or MPP. CRT response was defined by a reduction in end-systolic volume (ESV) ≥15% relative to BASELINE as determined by a blinded observer and alive status. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (New York Heart Association class III, ejection fraction [EF] 29% ± 6%, QRS 152 ± 17 ms) were enrolled and randomized to either CONV (N = 22) or MPP (N = 22). During the observation period, 2 patients died of noncardiac causes and 2 patients were lost to follow-up. After 12 months, 12 of 21 patients (57%) in the CONV group and 16 of 21 patients (76%) in the MPP group were classified as CRT responders (P = .33). ESV reduction and EF increase relative to BASELINE were significantly greater with MPP than with CONV (ESV: median -25%, interquartile range [IQR] [-39% to -20%] vs median -18%, IQR [-25% to -2%], P = .03; EF: median +15%, IQR [8% to 20%] vs median +5%, IQR [-1% to 8%], P <.001). CONCLUSION: Sustaining the trend observed 3 months postimplant, PV loop-guided multipoint LV pacing resulted in greater LV reverse remodeling and increased LV function at 12 months compared to PV loop-guided conventional CRT.
Authors: Antonios P Antoniadis; Ben Sieniewicz; Justin Gould; Bradley Porter; Jessica Webb; Simon Claridge; Jonathan M Behar; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi Journal: Curr Heart Fail Rep Date: 2017-10
Authors: Antonios P Antoniadis; Jonathan M Behar; Simon Claridge; Tom Jackson; Manav Sohal; Christopher Aldo Rinaldi Journal: Curr Cardiol Rep Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.931