| Literature DB >> 25667595 |
Tao Wu1, Ming Yang2, Tao Liu2, Lili Yang2, Guang Ji2.
Abstract
The prevalence of type 2 diabetes continuously increases globally. The traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) can stratify the diabetic patients based on their different TCM syndromes and, thus, allow a personalized treatment. Metabolomics is able to provide metabolite biomarkers for disease subtypes. In this study, we applied a metabolomics approach using an ultraperformance liquid chromatography (UPLC) coupled with quadruple-time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometry system to characterize the metabolic alterations of different TCM syndromes including excess and deficiency in patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM). We obtained a snapshot of the distinct metabolic changes of DM patients with different TCM syndromes. DM patients with excess syndrome have higher serum 2-indolecarboxylic acid, hypotaurine, pipecolic acid, and progesterone in comparison to those patients with deficiency syndrome. The excess patients have more oxidative stress as demonstrated by unique metabolite signatures than the deficiency subjects. The results provide an improved understanding of the systemic alteration of metabolites in different syndromes of DM. The identified serum metabolites may be of clinical relevance for subtyping of diabetic patients, leading to a personalized DM treatment.Entities:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25667595 PMCID: PMC4312632 DOI: 10.1155/2015/350703
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Clinical characteristics of excess and deficiency syndromes in patients with DM (mean ± SD).
| Patients with DM ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Excess | Deficiency |
| |
| Gender ( | 295 (107/188) | 57 (23/34) | 238 (84/154) | 0.476 |
| Age (year) | 70.69 ± 8.86 | 67.11 ± 9.49 | 71.55 ± 8.50 | <0.001 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.29 ± 2.90 | 24.57 ± 2.44 | 25.46 ± 2.98 | 0.037 |
| Waist circumference (cm) | 90.79 ± 7.92 | 89.49 ± 6.94 | 91.1 ± 8.13 | 0.170 |
| Hip circumference (cm) | 101.01 ± 7.39 | 99.38 ± 6.34 | 101.41 ± 7.58 | 0.063 |
| Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.90 ± 0.05 | 0.90 ± 0.06 | 0.795 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 138.11 ± 14.66 | 136.53 ± 14.40 | 138.49 ± 14.73 | 0.365 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 78.41 ± 9.47 | 79.72 ± 9.62 | 78.1 ± 9.43 | 0.247 |
| Obesity (BMI ≥ 25) | 51.8% (153/142) | 45.6% (26/31) | 53.4% (127/111) | 0.293 |
| Fatty liver disease | 74.9% (221/74) | 66.7% (38/19) | 76.9% (183/55) | 0.045 |
| Hypertension | 91.5% (270/25) | 87.7% (50/7) | 92.4% (220/18) | 0.251 |
| Hyperlipidemia | 41.0% (121/182) | 42.1% (24/33) | 39.9% (95/143) | 0.762 |
| Coronary heart disease | 23.3% (69/226) | 29.8% (17/40) | 21.8% (52/186) | 0.201 |
| Cerebrovascular accident | 0.07% (20/275) | 0.07% (4/53) | 0.07% (16/222) | 0.937 |
| Hyperuricemia | 0.07% (22/273) | 0.07% (4/53) | 0.08% (18/220) | 0.888 |
| FPG (mmol/L) | 7.60 ± 2.12 | 7.84 ± 2.36 | 7.55 ± 2.06 | 0.355 |
| 2 h PG (mmol/L) | 11.37 ± 3.69 | 11.51 ± 3.52 | 11.33 ± 3.74 | 0.742 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.55 ± 0.93 | 1.51 ± 0.84 | 1.57 ± 0.96 | 0.675 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.33 ± 0.36 | 1.29 ± 0.25 | 1.34 ± 0.38 | 0.322 |
| ALT (U/L) | 25.26 ± 13.19 | 26.97 ± 13.84 | 24.85 ± 13.02 | 0.276 |
| VLDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.57 ± 0.56 | 2.58 ± 0.59 | 2.57 ± 0.55 | 0.935 |
a P value refers to the comparison between excess versus deficiency syndromes within the DM group using independent samples t-test for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests for categorical variable with the SPSS 17.0 software (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois, USA). P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Parameters from GA.
| GA parameters | Initiate population |
| Selective ratio of initiate variable | Probability of simple point crossover |
|
| ||||
| Excess versus deficiency | 30 | 150 | 0.1 | 0.7 |
a K means times of genetic algebra.
Figure 1Accuracy of classification of cross-validation (ACCV) (a) and first predictive and Y-orthogonal score components (b) by the K-OPLS model in DM patients with excess and deficiency syndrome.
Parameters from KOPLS models.
| KOPLS Parameters | Sigma | Ao | ACCVa | R2Xb | R2Yb | Q2Yc | Total accuracy | Balance accuracy | AUCd | AUC 95% confidence interval | sensitivity | specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Excess versus Deficency | 2.5 | 3 | 0.860 | 0.425 | 1 | 0.944 | 0.949 | 0.968 | 0.968 | 0.950–0.987 | 1 | 0.937 |
aAccuracy of classification of cross-validation (ACCV) produced from each combination of σ and Ao parameters after cross-validation. bR2Xcum and R2Ycum represent the cumulative sum of squares (SS) of all the X's and Y's explained by all extracted components. cQ2Ycum is an estimate of how well the model predicts the Y's. dAUC in 0.5~0.7 has lower accuracy, AUC in 0.7~0.9 has certain accuracy (model can be accepted), and AUC in more than 0.9 has high accuracy. When AUC = 0.5, the model has no value.
Figure 2GA runs (a) and Wilcoxon rank sum test (b) in DM patients with excess and deficiency syndrome. (a) X-axis presents 135 metabolites as variables; Y-axis presents the number of selected times of the variables from GA. (b) X-axis presents 135 metabolites as variables; Y-axis presents the value of 1 − P from Wilcoxon rank sum test.
Figure 3Differentially expressed metabolites between groups in DM patients with excess and deficiency syndrome combined with GA runs and Wilcoxon rank sum test.