The scalable chemical vapor deposition of monolayer hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) single crystals, with lateral dimensions of ∼0.3 mm, and of continuous h-BN monolayer films with large domain sizes (>25 μm) is demonstrated via an admixture of Si to Fe catalyst films. A simple thin-film Fe/SiO2/Si catalyst system is used to show that controlled Si diffusion into the Fe catalyst allows exclusive nucleation of monolayer h-BN with very low nucleation densities upon exposure to undiluted borazine. Our systematic in situ and ex situ characterization of this catalyst system establishes a basis for further rational catalyst design for compound 2D materials.
The scalable chemical vapor deposition of monolayer hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) single crystals, with lateral dimensions of ∼0.3 mm, and of continuous h-BN monolayer films with large domain sizes (>25 μm) is demonstrated via an admixture of Si to Fe catalyst films. A simple thin-film Fe/SiO2/Si catalyst system is used to show that controlled Si diffusion into the Fe catalyst allows exclusive nucleation of monolayer h-BN with very low nucleation densities upon exposure to undiluted borazine. Our systematic in situ and ex situ characterization of this catalyst system establishes a basis for further rational catalyst design for compound 2D materials.
Entities:
Keywords:
Fe catalyst; Hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN); borazine (HBNH)3; chemical vapor deposition (CVD); in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD); secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS)
The technological
potential
of atomically thin, two-dimensional (2D) materials, including graphene,
hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), transition metal dichalcogenides,
and the numerous possible 2D heterostructures, is currently limited
by the lack of scalable growth control. Critical parameters to be
controlled for “electronic-grade” 2D materials include
the number of layers, stoichiometry, and crystal structure, i.e.,
domain size, connectivity, and orientation.[1−3] Significant
progress in the large area, high-quality manufacture of graphene in
particular has been made by catalytic chemical vapor deposition (CVD).[1,4] Essential to growth control for 2D material CVD is an understanding
of the underlying growth mechanisms, specifically the interactions
of the precursors and growing 2D structure with the catalyst.[5−7] The 2D domain size and distribution are thereby linked to nucleation
control.[8−10] Catalyst engineering, in particular designing surface
and bulk alloy catalysts, has been demonstrated to allow such nucleation
control for graphene CVD.[8,10,11] Most other application-relevant 2D materials such as h-BN are compounds,
which means that their controlled CVD is inherently more complex as
two elements need to be fed.[12] The lack
of understanding of such multicomponent materials systems is reflected
in the so far limited control over scalable growth.h-BN, isostructural
to graphene but with alternating B and N atoms
arranged in its monolayer honeycomb structure, is technologically
promising as an ultrathin dielectric-, support-, or barrier-layer
in particular for integrated electronics and photonics.[13] CVD of h-BN is seen as the most promising deposition
method and has been reported on a range of transition catalyst metals,
including Cu,[12,14−17] Pt,[18−20] Ni,[21−23] and Co[24] polycrystalline films and foils,
as well as on Fe,[25] Pd,[26] Pt,[27] Ag,[28] Ir,[29] Mo,[30] Ru,[31] and Rh[32] single crystals, with early reports of multilayer h-BN
CVD dating back to the 1970s.[33] Among the
largest as-grown h-BN single crystals to date are hexagonal domains
with areas of the order of ∼35 μm2 reported
for electropolished Cu foils,[34] but due
to the limited understanding of the growth process there is currently
no consensus as to which catalyst offers most growth control and the
highest h-BN quality. It is important to note that the constituent
element incorporation mechanisms, i.e., for B and N, are catalyst-mediated
and can be element-specific even for stoichiometric precursors such
as borazine.[35−37] For instance, Cu dissolves B but not N during h-BN
CVD.[12] Due to this growth complexity and
the vast parameter space of CVD, catalyst engineering and optimization
remain extremely challenging for compound 2D nanomaterials such as
h-BN.Here we establish a simple thin-film catalyst system,
based on
physical vapor deposited Fe on an oxidized Si wafer support, which
allows us to significantly improve nucleation and growth control for
h-BN CVD. By combining in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) with ex-situ
secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(XPS), we show that depending on the SiO2 thickness a controlled
amount of Si diffuses into the Fe catalyst upon annealing. This Si
admixture, albeit just at trace levels, allows us to exclusively nucleate
monolayer h-BN with very low nucleation densities upon exposure of
the Fe surface to undiluted borazine. For optimized CVD conditions
we demonstrate h-BN single crystal domains with lateral dimensions
of ∼0.3 mm as well as continuous h-BN monolayer films with
large domain sizes (>25 μm), as characterized by a combination
of Raman spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy (TEM), selected
area electron diffraction (SAED), and atomic force microscopy (AFM).
We believe that the understanding developed for this catalyst system
establishes a basis for further rational catalyst design for controlled
compound 2D material CVD.
Results
We adopt a simple CVD process
based on an initial
H2 annealing step, a subsequent isothermal exposure in
undiluted borazine and cooling in vacuum (see Methods). Figure 1a schematically shows our thin
film catalyst system. The central idea thereby is that depending on
the thickness of the SiO2 a controlled amount of Si will
diffuse into the Fe catalyst upon annealing. We systematically varied
the SiO2 thickness between ∼1 nm (native oxide)
and 2000 nm, with a Fe catalyst thickness of 1000 nm (unless otherwise
stated). We adopt the following substrate nomenclature: Fe(thickness)/SiO2(thickness)/Si substrate, with the Fe being on top of the
thin-film stack (Figure 1a). Figure 1b,c shows that under optimized CVD exposure conditions
very large, single-crystal monolayer h-BN domains can be achieved
as well as a continuous, homogeneous monolayer h-BN film of high quality.
Using a wide range of characterization techniques, we initially highlight
the h-BN material quality achieved before examining in detail the
growth mechanisms for this catalyst system.
Figure 1
(a) Schematic of catalyst
system composed of Fe/SiO2/Si. (b) SEM image of a large,
tooth-edged h-BN domain grown at 940
°C and 1 × 10–3 mbar borazine exposure
for 5 min (standard conditions) on Fe(1000 nm)/SiO2(300
nm)/Si substrates. Inset: corresponding low magnification SEM image.
(c) Continuous h-BN film homogeneously covering the Fe surface after
5 min of higher pressure borazine exposure (6 × 10–3 mbar) at 940 °C. The individual domain boundaries can be easily
identified, as indicated by the black arrows (top right inset).
(a) Schematic of catalyst
system composed of Fe/SiO2/Si. (b) SEM image of a large,
tooth-edged h-BN domain grown at 940
°C and 1 × 10–3 mbar borazine exposure
for 5 min (standard conditions) on Fe(1000 nm)/SiO2(300
nm)/Si substrates. Inset: corresponding low magnification SEM image.
(c) Continuous h-BN film homogeneously covering the Fe surface after
5 min of higher pressure borazine exposure (6 × 10–3 mbar) at 940 °C. The individual domain boundaries can be easily
identified, as indicated by the black arrows (top right inset).Figure 1b shows postgrowth SEM analysis
of the surface of a Fe(1000 nm)/SiO2(300 nm)/Si substrate
after CVD at ∼940 °C and 1 × 10–3 mbar borazine exposure for 5 min. We observe triangular regions
of constant contrast, with side lengths of ∼0.3 mm, which subsequent
characterization demonstrates are large, single-crystal hBN domains
(Figure 2). The edges are sawtoothed with each
tooth having edge length of ∼30 μm. The postgrowth Fe
surface was characterized using SEM channeling contrast and subsequently
by crystal orientation mapping in electron backscatter diffraction
(EBSD). The EBSD map in Figure S1 reveals
that the structure of the Fe layer consists of body-centered-cubic
Fe (α-Fe) grains with a mean size of approximately 50 μm
(circle equivalent diameter) and a maximum size of about 150 μm.
We note that the triangular h-BN regions, which are larger than the
average Fe grains (Figure 1b inset), are continuous
across numerous Fe grain boundaries. In such a case no clear overall
preferred h-BN domain orientations are apparent across the numerous
Fe grains, albeit h-BN domains can show alignment along specific orientations
with respect to the surface of a single catalyst grain. Continuous,
full h-BN monolayer coverage of the Fe surface can be achieved by
using a slightly higher borazine exposure pressure (6 × 10–3 mbar), as shown in Figure 1c. Increasing the borazine pressure increases the h-BN nucleation
density for constant temperature and growth time (Figure S2), leading to smaller triangular domain sizes for
the continuous film. Nonetheless, our analysis indicates that the
individual h-BN domains are >25 μm in average lateral size
(inset
in Figure S2c). We note that the domains
grown for the higher borazine pressures no longer display sawtooth
edges; however, they still preserve strict triangular shapes with
straight edges.
Figure 2
(a) Low-resolution TEM image of a suspended h-BN film
(CVD conditions
and substrate as in Figure 1b) supported on
holey carbon, copper mesh TEM grid, with corresponding hexagonal electron
diffraction pattern (top left inset) and edge analysis, confirming
the single layer nature of the film (bottom right inset). (b) SAED
study on a large triangular h-BN domain (standard CVD conditions).
The SEM image shows the location of the domain (enclosed by the white
dotted lines). The inset shows a similar triangle as-grown on the
catalyst before transfer. The five diffraction patterns obtained from
well-spaced regions of the domain have identical orientation, thus
confirming it is a single crystal. (c) Optical image of a continuous
h-BN film transferred onto a SiO2(300 nm)/Si wafer via
the electrochemical bubbling method. The inset shows a transferred
triangular domain from the sample in Figure 1b. (d) Raman spectrum measured at the center of one of the triangular
domains in c, showing the characteristic h-BN signal at 1369 cm–1. The additional peak at ∼1450 cm–1 can be attributed to third-order scattering from Si.[59] (e) AFM topography image of the tip of a h-BN
triangle with detail of a domain edge (right) and corresponding step-height
measurement taken at the position of the white line.
(a) Low-resolution TEM image of a suspended h-BN film
(CVD conditions
and substrate as in Figure 1b) supported on
holey carbon, copper mesh TEM grid, with corresponding hexagonal electron
diffraction pattern (top left inset) and edge analysis, confirming
the single layer nature of the film (bottom right inset). (b) SAED
study on a large triangular h-BN domain (standard CVD conditions).
The SEM image shows the location of the domain (enclosed by the white
dotted lines). The inset shows a similar triangle as-grown on the
catalyst before transfer. The five diffraction patterns obtained from
well-spaced regions of the domain have identical orientation, thus
confirming it is a single crystal. (c) Optical image of a continuous
h-BN film transferred onto a SiO2(300 nm)/Si wafer via
the electrochemical bubbling method. The inset shows a transferred
triangular domain from the sample in Figure 1b. (d) Raman spectrum measured at the center of one of the triangular
domains in c, showing the characteristic h-BN signal at 1369 cm–1. The additional peak at ∼1450 cm–1 can be attributed to third-order scattering from Si.[59] (e) AFM topography image of the tip of a h-BN
triangle with detail of a domain edge (right) and corresponding step-height
measurement taken at the position of the white line.Figure 2a,b shows TEM analysis
of as-grown
h-BN layers transferred to a holey carbon/copper mesh TEM grid, which
verifies our above extrapolation of h-BN domain sizes by uniformity
in SEM contrast. Figure 2a shows a low-resolution
TEM image of a suspended h-BN film with its corresponding 6-spot diffraction
pattern, indicating that the structure is crystalline with hexagonal
symmetry. Additionally, the edge analysis confirms the single-layer
nature of the film. Figure 2b shows selected
area diffraction mapping on a large triangular h-BN domain (corresponding
to Figure 1b). The diffraction patterns obtained
from well-spaced areas all have identical orientation confirming the
triangular regions of constant contrast are indeed single crystalline
h-BN domains. Figure 2c shows an optical microscopy
image of a h-BN film transferred to a SiO2(300 nm)/Si wafer.
The uniform contrast indicates the macroscopic uniformity, notwithstanding
the PMMA residuals typically seen for such transfers without a subsequent
cleaning step. The inset shows a transferred h-BN domain from the
sample in Figure 1b and its corresponding Raman
spectra (Figure 2d), exhibiting the characteristic
peak at 1369 cm–1, which is related to the in-plane
ring vibration of h-BN.[38] Figure 2e shows the AFM analysis of the transferred h-BN
domains (inset Figure 2c). The AFM image again
confirms uniformity of the h-BN domain. From the step height profile
at the domain edge, we extrapolate a thickness of <0.4 nm, consistent
with literature values for monolayer h-BN.[17]Key to the controlled growth of high-quality h-BN demonstrated
here is the addition of trace amounts of Si to the active Fe catalyst.
Figure 3 shows how the amount of Si dissolved
into the Fe film can be adjusted by varying the SiO2 interlayer
thickness. Figure 3a–k compares h-BN
growth for short (1 min) and longer (5 min) borazine exposures for
the Fe(1000 nm) catalyst supported on native (∼1 nm), 200,
500, and 2000 nm thick SiO2. For the native oxide support,
the postgrowth Fe surface appears extremely rough and cracked with
no visible h-BN domains (Figure 3a,b). For
the 200 nm thick SiO2 support, we observe triangular h-BN
domains with dimensions of the order of 20 μm after a 1 min
exposure (Figure 3d). After 5 min of borazine
exposure, the h-BN film almost fully covers the Fe surface. However,
the sample is very inhomogeneous due to the appearance of “crater”-like
features (Figure 3e). We note that these craters
interrupt the continuity of the growing h-BN. This becomes more evident
after transferring the sample onto a SiO2(300)/Si wafer
(Figure S3a), where holes in the h-BN film
are found in the locations corresponding to the craters. For the 500
nm thick SiO2 support, the h-BN domains are larger (80–100
μm) for 1 min exposure times (Figure 3g), and the nucleation density shows a 5-fold decrease compared to
the SiO2(200 nm) sample (Figure 3d). For longer borazine exposures the sample exhibits homogeneous
h-BN coverage without “craters” emerging (Figure 3h). For the significantly thicker SiO2 (2000 nm) support, h-BN domains with dimensions <20 μm
on average are seen after 1 min (Figure 3j),
and the h-BN nucleation density increases by a factor of 3 with respect
to the SiO2(500 nm) sample (Figure 3g). After 5 min borazine exposure, the Fe surface is almost completely
covered (Figure 3k); however, we also observe
a high density of small bright contrast regions by SEM, which correspond
to h-BN multilayers (as confirmed by post-transfer optical imaging).
A similar h-BN morphology is observed on sapphire- and quartz-supported
Fe catalyst films (Figure S4), which exhibit
a mixture of monolayer and multilayered domains.
Figure 3
Schematics of the catalyst system and SEM images of the surface
after growth at 940 °C and 3 × 10–3 mbar
borazine exposure for 1 min (a,d,g,j) and 5 min (b,e,h,k) for Fe/SiO2(x)/Si substrates, where x = native, 200, 500, and 2000 nm, respectively. SIMS 3D maps (c,f,i,l)
showing the Si distributions in top 120 nm of the surface, corresponding
to the samples respectively shown in (a,d,g,j).
Schematics of the catalyst system and SEM images of the surface
after growth at 940 °C and 3 × 10–3 mbar
borazine exposure for 1 min (a,d,g,j) and 5 min (b,e,h,k) for Fe/SiO2(x)/Si substrates, where x = native, 200, 500, and 2000 nm, respectively. SIMS 3D maps (c,f,i,l)
showing the Si distributions in top 120 nm of the surface, corresponding
to the samples respectively shown in (a,d,g,j).In order to identify the origin of the variations across
the samples
with differing SiO2 thicknesses, we perform postgrowth
SIMS depth profiling. We note that the samples have been stored in
air for two months prior to SIMS analysis. Figure 3c,f,i,l shows the distribution of Si (green dots) within the
top 120 nm of the Fe catalyst surface for each of the respective SiO2 thicknesses. For all samples the Si appears distributed within
the catalyst, and within the given 1 μm spatial resolution of
the technique there is no clear evidence of segregation (aside from
the crater-like regions). We also note that the Si is detectable at
the Fe surface for all samples. It is important to emphasize that,
while SIMS allows here a detailed relative comparison of elemental
distributions, absolute concentrations (e.g., of Si) could not be
readily extracted from SIMS given the polycrystalline nature of the
reference sample, in which different grain orientations have different
sputter yields, and the unknown distributions of various oxide species
throughout the sample. The postgrowth Si–:Fe2– ratio plotted as a function of depth from
the Fe surface is shown in Figure S5. The
SIMS analysis clearly shows that the Si– signal
decreases for increasing SiO2 barrier thickness indicating
decreasing amounts of dissolved Si. As expected, the Si content of
the SiO2(2000 nm) sample shows the lowest concentration
of the processed samples with a barrier layer present, which is similar
to the concentration detected for a control Fe(1000 nm)/SiO2(500 nm)/Si substrate analyzed before processing
(Figure S5). In order to gauge the absolute
level of the Si concentrations, we perform ex situ XPS comparing the
concentration of Si in the postgrowth Fe(1000 nm)/SiO2(native)/Si
and Fe(1000 nm)/SiO2(200 nm)/Si samples. While a Si concentration
of ∼20.1 at. % was estimated for the native oxide sample, the
Si signal was below XPS detection limits for the 200 nm oxide sample,
indicating a surface concentration of <0.1 at. %.Important
to understanding the catalytic h-BN growth mechanisms
is characterization of the catalyst film evolution during CVD and of the interactions of B, N, and the grown h-BN with the
catalyst. Figure 4a shows in situ XRD patterns
that characterize the crystalline structure of the Fe catalyst during
the salient stages of the CVD process. Upon annealing (∼940
°C), the body-centered-cubic (bcc, α-Fe) as-deposited Fe(500
nm) film undergoes a phase transformation to face-centered-cubic (fcc)
γ-Fe (consistent with Fe phase diagram data[39,40]) and grain growth occurs (evidenced by increasing intensity and
decreasing width of the reflections). Concurrently we observe the
appearance of XRD signatures that can be ascribed to silicate formation
(Fe2SiO4, Fayalite). Importantly, this silicate
formation occurs upon high temperature pretreatment prior to the borazine exposure, and as highlighted by a comparison of
surface- and bulk- sensitive scans (Figure S6), the silicates are buried in the catalyst bulk, likely at the Fe-SiO2 interface, and not present on the surface. The appearance
of a small peak at ∼18° with increasing borazine exposure
time is attributed to the isothermal growth of h-BN. The catalyst
phase remains predominantly γ-Fe during short (∼5 min)
borazine exposures, after which the catalyst fully reverts to α-Fe
upon cooling (not shown, consistent with EBSD in Figure S1). For longer borazine exposure times (∼15
min) the additional formation of a small fraction of Fe-borides (FeB
and Fe2B, located near the top surface of the catalyst
films, see Figure S7) indicates that B
dissolves into the Fe during CVD (although even in the case of Fe-boride
formation the majority catalyst phase remains as metallic Fe, see Figure S7). The formation of structural Fe-nitrides
was not observed for borazine exposure, but control experiments, in
which the Fe films are exposed to undiluted NH3 instead
of borazine, suggest that nitrogen is dissolved into the surface region
of the γ-Fe catalyst at the growth conditions (as indicated
by Fe lattice expansion upon NH3 addition, Figure S8). Thus, the observed isothermal h-BN
growth mechanism appears linked to both B and N uptake into the Fe
catalyst surface region during CVD. For longer borazine exposure times,
in addition to Fe-boride formation, an isothermal transformation of
the majority phase from γ-Fe to α-Fe occurs at growth
temperature, which is attributed to continued B and/or Si diffusion
into the Fe (Figure S9).[41] Independent of the borazine exposure time, upon cooling
the majority catalyst phase reverts to α-Fe following a temperature
induced phase transition (with only minor Fe-boride contributions
remaining for the extended growth times).
Figure 4
(a) Surface sensitive
in situ XRD patterns of a Fe/SiO2(300 nm)/Si sample during
the salient stages of the CVD process.
Fe undergoes a thermally induced phase transformation from as-deposited
α-Fe to γ-Fe upon heating to 940 °C. Vacuum annealing
at 940 °C leads to the appearance of reflections that can be
ascribed to iron silicates, Fe2SiO4 (labeled
with “*”). Upon borazine exposure (1 × 10–3 mbar) isothermal h-BN growth is indicated by the appearance of a
reflection at ∼18°. For short (5 min) borazine exposure
the catalyst phase stays predominantly γ-Fe, while for extended
(15 min) borazine feeding the appearance of Fe-boride phases (FeB
and Fe2B) indicates B dissolution into Fe, and an isothermal
transformation of γ-Fe to α-Fe is observed (possibly linked
to further B and/or Si diffusion,[41] see Figure S9). The room temperature phase after
CVD is almost fully α-Fe. We note that intensity is plotted
here on a log scale to emphasize minority phases. Figure S7 shows the same data plotted on a linear scale. (b)
SIMS depth distribution of the top 120 nm from the surface of B, N,
Si, and Fe related species of a Fe/SiO2(500 nm)/Si sample,
indicating a number of distinct regions of material distribution,
showing a nitrogen rich surface layer followed by an oxygen rich region
over the next ∼6 nm (shaded area). The h-BN was grown for 5
min at 940 °C and 3 × 10–3 mbar.
(a) Surface sensitive
in situ XRD patterns of a Fe/SiO2(300 nm)/Si sample during
the salient stages of the CVD process.
Fe undergoes a thermally induced phase transformation from as-deposited
α-Fe to γ-Fe upon heating to 940 °C. Vacuum annealing
at 940 °C leads to the appearance of reflections that can be
ascribed to iron silicates, Fe2SiO4 (labeled
with “*”). Upon borazine exposure (1 × 10–3 mbar) isothermal h-BN growth is indicated by the appearance of a
reflection at ∼18°. For short (5 min) borazine exposure
the catalyst phase stays predominantly γ-Fe, while for extended
(15 min) borazine feeding the appearance of Fe-boride phases (FeB
and Fe2B) indicates B dissolution into Fe, and an isothermal
transformation of γ-Fe to α-Fe is observed (possibly linked
to further B and/or Si diffusion,[41] see Figure S9). The room temperature phase after
CVD is almost fully α-Fe. We note that intensity is plotted
here on a log scale to emphasize minority phases. Figure S7 shows the same data plotted on a linear scale. (b)
SIMS depth distribution of the top 120 nm from the surface of B, N,
Si, and Fe related species of a Fe/SiO2(500 nm)/Si sample,
indicating a number of distinct regions of material distribution,
showing a nitrogen rich surface layer followed by an oxygen rich region
over the next ∼6 nm (shaded area). The h-BN was grown for 5
min at 940 °C and 3 × 10–3 mbar.In situ XRD indicates B and N
dissolution into the Fe catalyst
during h-BN growth, which we can further corroborate using postgrowth
ex situ SIMS. We note that all SIMS profiles were obtained on samples
that underwent only short borazine exposures (∼5 min), i.e.,
before in situ XRD indicates significant Fe-boride formation and isothermal
γ-Fe to α-Fe transitions. Figure 4b shows the SIMS profile distribution for the Fe2, BN,
CN, Si, and BO2 negative ions over the first 120 nm from
the postgrowth Fe catalyst surface of the SiO2(500 nm)
sample from Figure 3. The immediate surface
region (<1 nm) contains a nitrogen rich composition with BN and
CN species distributed across the surface, with the latter likely
originating from air exposure. Although greatly decreased in concentration,
both are still detected over the total sputtered depth. We note that
the BN tends to be located at more specific points, possibly along
Fe grain boundaries and edges. Once this nitrogen containing surface
layer is removed, the next ∼6 nm are dominated by oxygen containing
species of Fe, B, and Si (shaded gray area in Figure 4b). Subsequently, we see an increase in the Fe2– ion signal indicating sputtering of oxide free
molecular Fe from the deposited layer. With increased depth from the
surface, we begin to see an increase in the BO2– signal indicating an increased oxide concentration closer to the
Fe/SiO2 interface. The Si– signal is
detectable at the surface and shows a very small and gradual increase
with depth. There is no evidence of an N– ion signal
at any location over the sputtered region as nitrogen does not readily
form a negative ion, but a small atomic B– related
ion signal is detected confined to the near surface region (which
is possibly due to areas of unreacted B, or decomposition of BO during
sputtering). Combined, the SIMS observations support the in situ XRD
data showing B and N uptake into the Fe catalyst in particular near
the film surface, as well as again confirming the presence of Si throughout
the films. We note that all SIMS signals here are influenced by air
exposure during storage as discussed in further detail in the Supporting Information (see Figure S10).
Discussion
We first outline the general growth scenario
for graphene CVD on catalyst surfaces, which represents a somewhat
simpler monoelemental model system for understanding 2D material growth.
It is worth pointing out that the understanding of graphene CVD remains
incomplete, but numerous detailed growth studies for different catalysts
and conditions across the literature allow some first-order growth
model generalizations[8,10,42,43] that will serve as a reference for our further
discussion below. For an initially bare catalyst surface, the supply
of carbon from precursor dissociation begins to fill the catalyst
with carbon close to the surface, which is mediated by carbon diffusion
into and out from the catalyst bulk.[5,11] On reaching
the carbon solubility limit, the further supply of carbon causes a
supersaturation leading to the nucleation and subsequent growth of
graphene at the catalyst surface.[44]Following basic 2D nucleation models, graphene nucleation
is assumed to typically require a much higher supersaturation of C
species compared to the subsequent growth phase,[42,43] and for each of these phases the rate limiting step for graphene
growth can be different and may depend on growth conditions. Among
the most important CVD parameters is temperature, which dictates several
factors including the dissociation kinetics of the CVD precursor and
the desorption and diffusivity of resulting species on and within
the catalyst. The diffusion length or capture radius of growth species
can thereby provide a minimum estimate of the graphene nucleation
density. Catalyst surface imperfections, such as step edges, defects,
and impurities, can be active sites for graphene nucleation.[8,10,42,45] Hence a passivation of such active sites by catalyst alloying or
admixtures presents a pathway to lowering the graphene nucleation
density, i.e., to achieve much larger graphene domain sizes.[8,10] It should be emphasized that the active catalyst surface is highly
dynamic at the elevated temperatures and gas exposures typically used;
hence as a basis for any growth model, it is of key importance to
capture and understand the phase of the catalyst during CVD and its
dynamic interactions with the precursors and growing 2D structure.Figure 5a schematically illustrates the
salient stages of the given h-BN CVD process and sets the context
for our discussion on the crucial aspects of h-BN growth, as outlined
in Figure 5b, including ternary and quaternary
phase diagram considerations (Figure 5c). Prior
to borazine introduction at ∼940 °C, the catalyst phase
is almost entirely γ-Fe (fcc Fe, austenite) as expected given
the phase transition from α-Fe (bcc Fe, ferrite) that occurs
at ∼912 °C for elemental Fe.[39,40] During the annealing stage Si diffuses into the Fe, evidenced by
ex situ SIMS and the formation of interfacial silicates observed by
in situ XRD (Figure 5b, Step 1). The latter
implies the partial breakdown of the interlayer by the formation of
a fayalite phase at the expense of SiO2,[46] and we thus propose that Si diffusion occurs due to the
thermal instability of the Fe/SiO2 and SiO2/Si
interfaces at 940 °C in oxygen deficient environments.[47,48] The Si concentration increases for thinner SiO2 layers,
and for SiO2(200 nm) layers the appearance of “crater”-like
features, rich in Si and to a lesser extent Fe (as confirmed by EDX, Figure S3c,d,e), indicates the onset of Fe silicidation,
which is deleterious to h-BN growth. The dissociation of borazine
during exposure supplies B and N species to the Fe surface (Figure 5b, Step 2), and based on the ternary Fe–B–N
phase diagram (Figure 5c), the incorporation
of B and N into the Fe catalyst as a solid solution is expected (Figure 5b, Step 3).[49] This is
supported by our in situ XRD measurements, which evidence B uptake
(via Fe-boride formation for extended borazine exposure, Figure 4a) and N uptake (via lattice expansion during NH3 exposure control experiments, Figure
S8) into the Fe catalyst surface region. Also our ex situ SIMS
characterization further corroborates B and N uptake as shown by the
presence of B and N containing species in the postgrowth Fe. During
borazine exposure the Fe surface will continue to fill with B and
N until the solubility limit is reached, corresponding to the incubation
period prior to isothermal h-BN formation. Importantly for this ternary
system (phase diagram sketch in Figure 5c),
the interaction of the different solutes leads to a solubility limit
and a subsequent phase evolution that depends on the relative proportions
of B and N.[35−37] At the extremes of the solubility line, the nucleation
of either just Fe-borides (B-rich end) or just Fe-nitrides (N-rich
end) is expected; however, we exclude these growth trajectories for
our conditions given that B and N are concurrently supplied by the
borazine dissociation and that h-BN formation is confirmed following
the growth process (even for exposure times where no Fe-boride formation
is observed in XRD). Additionally, XPS measurements also reveal a
B/N ratio of 1:1.03 ± 0.03 for the sample with SiO2(200 nm) close to the surface (information depth ∼6 nm). Instead,
on crossing the solubility line at an intermediate B–N ratio,
a supersaturation of B and N develops at the surface leading to the
nucleation of h-BN, which grows with continuing exposure (Figure 5b, Step 4) (this growth trajectory is indicated
by the red arrow in Figure 5c). While some
loss of dissociated N from the catalyst surface to the gas phase in
the form of N2 may additionally occur (Figure 5b, Step 5), we note that an intermediate B:N ratio
appears to be maintained in the Fe catalyst, in contrast to Cu, for
example, where the much larger solubility of B compared to N leads
to growth occurring with predominantly B and negligible
N diffusion into the catalyst bulk,[12] and
also contrasting with previous suggestions regarding the mechanisms
of boron nitride nanotube growth mechanisms from Fe catalysts.[35−37] No additional h-BN layer formation was observed ex situ for the
optimized growth conditions, suggesting that growth occurs predominantly
isothermally rather than by precipitation upon cooling.[8,44]
Figure 5
(a)
Schematic illustrating the salient stages of the CVD process
for the conditions used in this work. The 3D diagrams depict the state
of the catalyst system during these steps, and the green, red, and
blue arrows indicate the incorporation of Si, B and N into the Fe
bulk, respectively. We note that the Fe undergoes a phase transformation
during annealing, which reverts either upon cooling after short borazine
exposure times (t1) or isothermally at
temperature for longer borazine exposure times (t2). The gray labels on the bottom of the schematic indicate
at which stages the various characterization techniques were performed.
(b) Schematic of the growth model for h-BN CVD on Fe/SiO2/Si substrates: (1) Annealing: onset of Si diffusion into the catalyst;
(2) exposure: the borazine molecules impinge on the surface where
they dehydrogenate and dissociate; (3) B and N species diffuse into
the Fe catalyst; (4) nucleation and growth of h-BN; (5) possible desorption
of surface N to gas phase. (c) detail of the Fe-rich corner of the
Fe–B–N ternary phase diagram in the isothermal section
at 950 °C.[49] The blue region corresponds
to the solid solution of B and N in γ-Fe. The yellow region
corresponds the three-phase equilibrium of Fe2B, γ-Fe,
and h-BN. The red arrow indicates the suggested reaction pathway during
CVD of h-BN on Fe films.
(a)
Schematic illustrating the salient stages of the CVD process
for the conditions used in this work. The 3D diagrams depict the state
of the catalyst system during these steps, and the green, red, and
blue arrows indicate the incorporation of Si, B and N into the Fe
bulk, respectively. We note that the Fe undergoes a phase transformation
during annealing, which reverts either upon cooling after short borazine
exposure times (t1) or isothermally at
temperature for longer borazine exposure times (t2). The gray labels on the bottom of the schematic indicate
at which stages the various characterization techniques were performed.
(b) Schematic of the growth model for h-BN CVD on Fe/SiO2/Si substrates: (1) Annealing: onset of Si diffusion into the catalyst;
(2) exposure: the borazine molecules impinge on the surface where
they dehydrogenate and dissociate; (3) B and N species diffuse into
the Fe catalyst; (4) nucleation and growth of h-BN; (5) possible desorption
of surface N to gas phase. (c) detail of the Fe-rich corner of the
Fe–B–N ternary phase diagram in the isothermal section
at 950 °C.[49] The blue region corresponds
to the solid solution of B and N in γ-Fe. The yellow region
corresponds the three-phase equilibrium of Fe2B, γ-Fe,
and h-BN. The red arrow indicates the suggested reaction pathway during
CVD of h-BN on Fe films.Our data shows that the h-BN nucleation density varies with
the
amount of Si in and on the Fe catalyst. It is well-known from heterogeneous
catalysis that the chemical and structural state of the catalyst surface
impacts its reactivity and selectivity.[45] As outlined above, prior literature on graphene CVD showed catalyst
admixtures that lead to a lowering of the graphene nucleation density,[8] rationalized by the passivation of active catalyst
sites. As highlighted by Figure 3, the situation
here is clearly more complex: while going from Figure 3j to g, the initial increase in Si concentration leads to
preferential nucleation of monolayer h-BN and a reduction in the number
of h-BN nuclei, whereas a further increase in Si concentration from
Figure 3g to d leads to a 5-fold increase in
the h-BN nucleation density. When considering the role of Si the full
complexity of the h-BN growth process (Figure 5) has to be taken into account. It is important to emphasize that
relevant for h-BN nucleation and growth is the state and dynamics
of the catalyst surface during the CVD process at
elevated temperatures and gas exposure.Given the low Si concentrations
(<0.1 at. %, determined from
XPS) present in samples with SiO2 interlayers of 200 nm
or more, the catalyst phase is γ-Fe prior to exposure as expected
from literature[50] and the phase diagram
of Figure 5c. The general catalyst phase evolution
of Figure 5a remains relevant, at least for
short growth times.[51] In the context of
the basic framework outlined in Figure 5b,
the Si admixture can in particular affect the catalytic dissociation
of borazine (step 2) and the nucleation of h-BN (step 4). The growth
behavior observed in Figures 3d,g,j can be
rationalized by assuming that the Si locally reduces the supersaturation
required to nucleate h-BN, meaning the onset of nucleation is reached
more quickly and the precursor supply feeds fewer nuclei, which can
thus grow to larger dimensions for the same exposure time (Figure 3j–g). Further Si addition (Figure 3g–d) then leads to a higher nucleation density.
It is interesting to note that postgrowth analysis shows no obvious
preference for h-BN nucleation to occur at Fe grain boundaries or
craters (see Supporting Information, Figure
S11). The series of Figures 3d,g,j also indicates
a trend of increasing h-BN coverage with increasing Si concentration.
This suggests that the Si admixture enhances the catalytic borazine
dissociation. Similar to graphene CVD, the overall rate-limiting step
for h-BN growth is bound to depend on the CVD conditions, and different
kinetic processes can govern the different growth phases. The growth
mode of h-BN domains on the catalyst surface can be limited by the
incorporation kinetics of the constituent species (i.e. B and N) at
the growth fronts or by the diffusion of the constituent species.
For graphene CVD, the latter results in dendritic domain growth due
to instabilities arising from growth front protrusions, whereas for
the former the domain evolution can be described via kinematic Wulff
constructions.[52] Due to the inequivalent
sublattices, such Wulff constructions for h-BN or other compound 2D
materials, including transition metal dichalcogenides,[53−55] result in much stricter geometric shapes, in agreement with the
mostly triangular shaped h-BN domains observed here (Figures 1 and 3). Recent calculations[52] indicate that diffusion instabilities in this
case lead to sawtoothed edge geometries, exactly as we observe here
for our lower pressure borazine exposures (Figures 1b and 3). The exploration of the richness
of these interactions for 2D compound materials is beyond the scope
of this paper, but the discussion highlights the importance of our
data here in establishing a first-order framework to guide further
progress and to foster a more detailed understanding of the specific
growth mechanisms.
Conclusions
In
summary we have shown that catalyst
engineering allows a significant level of improvement and control
of nucleation and growth of h-BN layers. We focus on a simple thin-film
catalyst model system, based on physical vapor deposited Fe on oxidized
Si wafer support. Our systematic characterization shows that by tuning
the SiO2 thickness the amount of Si supplied to the Fe
catalyst can be carefully controlled. This Si admixture, albeit just
at trace levels, allows us to exclusively nucleate monolayer h-BN
and to demonstrate h-BN single crystal domains with lateral dimensions
of ∼0.3 mm as well as continuous h-BN monolayer films with
large domain sizes (>25 μm). Our data gives insights into
the
complex growth mechanisms, with both B and N dissolving into the Si-doped
Fe catalyst. We rationalize the role of Si in terms of the underlying
framework of heterogeneous catalysis. We believe that the insights
gained establish a basis for further rational catalyst design for
controlled compound 2D material CVD. We note that there are many possible
routes to deliver the nucleation promoter, here Si, including for
instance addition via the CVD gas atmosphere or prealloying in catalyst
foils. Our results here can not only be generalized in terms of processing
routes, but we expect that the findings are also highly relevant to
the CVD of other compound 2D materials in particular to enhance their
scalable growth control, as required for most future applications.
Methods
h-BN Growth
The substrates are prepared by sputter
deposition of 1 μm of Fe (Lesker target 99.99% purity) on SiO2(x)/Si wafers (PI-KEM, where x is native (∼1 nm), 200, 300, 500, and 2000 nm), sapphire
(Alfa Aesar, EPI one-side polished, C-axis) and quartz (Spectrosil
B Polished Windows). We note that Si wafers have very low B contents
<26 ppb, thus not impacting our characterization. The h-BN films
are grown in a customized Aixtron BM3 cold-wall reactor (base pressure
1 × 10–6 mbar). In this work we define the
standard CVD parameters for growth of h-BN as 5 min borazine (HBNH)3 exposure at a temperature of 940 °C and at a total pressure
of 1 × 10–3 mbar. The samples are typically
heated in 3.6 mbar of H2 at 250 °C/min up to 750 °C
and then at 50 °C/min up to 940 °C. After 2 min annealing
at 940 °C the H2 is removed. Borazine is dosed into
the chamber through a leak valve (from a liquid reservoir), and after
5 min growth time the borazine leak valve is closed and the heater
is turned off. Samples are cooled in vacuum.
Transfer
For Raman
spectroscopy, optical microscopy,
and atomic force microscopy, we transfer the h-BN via the electrochemical
bubbling method.[56] We perform the transfer
by spin coating a support layer of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA)
at 5000 rpm for 40 s onto the h-BN. The sample is placed in a NaOH
bath (1 M) that serves as electrolyte, and two platinum wires are
used as electrodes. The Pt anode is immersed in the solution, whereas
the Pt cathode is contacted with the sample. During electrolysis H2 bubbles evolve at the h-BN/Fe interface, lifting the film
from the substrate. The PMMA/h-BN film is rinsed in deionized (DI)
water and scooped onto a SiO2(300 nm)/Si wafer where it
is left to dry. The PMMA is removed by immersing the sample in acetone
for ∼12 h, followed by a rinse in IPA.
Characterization
For the ex situ characterization of
the h-BN on the catalyst, we use scanning electron microscopy (SEM,
Zeiss SigmaVP, 2 kV). For compositional analysis, we employ energy
dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX, 20 kV). Optical images are acquired
using a Nikon eclipse ME600L microscope. AFM imaging is performed
using a Nanoscope 3000 instrument, and the data for the height profile
are analyzed using Gwyddion (images have been leveled using a path
leveling tool). Raman spectroscopy is performed with a Renishaw Raman
InVia microscope, using a 50× objective lens and a 532 nm laser
excitation. TEM analysis is conducted using a Tecnai F20 microscope
operated at 200 kV, with the h-BN film placed on a holey carbon film/copper
mesh TEM grid (Agar Scientific, 200 copper mesh S147H). Ex situ XPS
for the determination of the levels of Si, B, and N present was carried
out using a monochromated Al Kα source (Ephoton = 1486.7 eV) using a Kratos AXIS Ultra DLD XPS instrument
at the National Physical Laboratory (UK). CasaXPS software was used
to measure the peak areas using a linear or Tougaard background as
appropriate, with the NPL transmission function (intensity) calibration
and average matrix relative sensitivity factors (AMRSF), to determine
the concentrations of the detectable elements present.[57] The energy scale is regularly calibrated to
ISO 15472, and the position of the carbon 1s peak at 284.5 eV was
checked to ensure peaks were at the correct binding energy positions.
In situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements are conducted at the
European Synchrotron Research Facility (beamline BM20/ROBL) in a previously
described setup[8,58] using a X-ray wavelength of 1.078
Å. Surface-sensitive measurements are acquired in grazing incidence
geometry (angle of incidence 0.5°, information depth estimated
to ∼100 nm) while bulk-sensitive measurements (information
depth in the μm range) are acquired in symmetric θ–2θ
geometry (sample tilted out of plane by 3° to suppress reflections
from the single crystalline wafer substrates). We note that the step
at ∼19° is due to the arrangement of detector and X-ray
entrance/exit slits into the reaction chamber and that reflection
positions shift between room temperature and CVD temperature scans
due to thermal expansion. Phase identification is undertaken by comparison
to the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) (α-Fe: 53451,
γ-Fe: 44862, Fayalite Fe2SiO4: 4353, Fe2B: 391330, FeB: 391331, ε-FeN: 80930, γ′-Fe4N: 79980, h-BN: 167799) and
International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database (Fe2SiO4: 711670, Fe2B: 361332, FeB: 320463).
Secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) measurements are performed
at the National Physical Laboratory (UK) using a TOF-SIMS IV time-of-flight
secondary ion mass spectrometer (ION-TOF GmbH, Germany), equipped
with a dual source column for sputtering and a liquid metal ion gun
at an angle of 45° to the surface normal. The depth calibration
is based on a calculation of the sputter rate of Fe using Cs+ ions at 10 keV and an ion current of 20 nA over a sputter area of
400 × 400 μm, giving a sputter rate of ∼0.064 (±3%)
nm/s. The analysis beam consists of Bi3+ ions operated
at 25 keV, with an ion current of 0.1 pA, randomly rastered over an
area of 150 μm × 150 μm in the center of the sputter
crater. To compare the relative concentration of Si in each of the
samples in Figure S5, the ratio of the
Si– ion signal to the Fe2– ion signal is compared, as due to variations in the sample grain
structures, which in turn have different ionization potentials for
the same ions, as well as variations in the oxygen content distributed
in the samples, means that a direct comparison of the silicon signals
is not possible. The Fe2– signal from
the deposited Fe layer is used to provide a constant comparison as
this signal is unlikely to be affected by contributions from sputter
generated species. An electron flood gun generating 20 eV electrons
is used to compensate for surface charging.
Authors: Robert S Weatherup; Bernhard C Bayer; Raoul Blume; Carsten Baehtz; Piran R Kidambi; Martin Fouquet; Christoph T Wirth; Robert Schlögl; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Chemphyschem Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 3.102
Authors: Lijie Ci; Li Song; Chuanhong Jin; Deep Jariwala; Dangxin Wu; Yongjie Li; Anchal Srivastava; Z F Wang; Kevin Storr; Luis Balicas; Feng Liu; Pulickel M Ajayan Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2010-02-28 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Li Song; Lijie Ci; Hao Lu; Pavel B Sorokin; Chuanhong Jin; Jie Ni; Alexander G Kvashnin; Dmitry G Kvashnin; Jun Lou; Boris I Yakobson; Pulickel M Ajayan Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Sheneve Z Butler; Shawna M Hollen; Linyou Cao; Yi Cui; Jay A Gupta; Humberto R Gutiérrez; Tony F Heinz; Seung Sae Hong; Jiaxing Huang; Ariel F Ismach; Ezekiel Johnston-Halperin; Masaru Kuno; Vladimir V Plashnitsa; Richard D Robinson; Rodney S Ruoff; Sayeef Salahuddin; Jie Shan; Li Shi; Michael G Spencer; Mauricio Terrones; Wolfgang Windl; Joshua E Goldberger Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Robert S Weatherup; Hakim Amara; Raoul Blume; Bruno Dlubak; Bernhard C Bayer; Mamadou Diarra; Mounib Bahri; Andrea Cabrero-Vilatela; Sabina Caneva; Piran R Kidambi; Marie-Blandine Martin; Cyrile Deranlot; Pierre Seneor; Robert Schloegl; François Ducastelle; Christophe Bichara; Stephan Hofmann Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Piran R Kidambi; Bernhard C Bayer; Raoul Blume; Zhu-Jun Wang; Carsten Baehtz; Robert S Weatherup; Marc-Georg Willinger; Robert Schloegl; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2013-09-24 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Bernhard C Bayer; David A Bosworth; F Benjamin Michaelis; Raoul Blume; Gerlinde Habler; Rainer Abart; Robert S Weatherup; Piran R Kidambi; Jeremy J Baumberg; Axel Knop-Gericke; Robert Schloegl; Carsten Baehtz; Zoe H Barber; Jannik C Meyer; Stephan Hofmann Journal: J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Sabina Caneva; Robert S Weatherup; Bernhard C Bayer; Raoul Blume; Andrea Cabrero-Vilatela; Philipp Braeuninger-Weimer; Marie-Blandine Martin; Ruizhi Wang; Carsten Baehtz; Robert Schloegl; Jannik C Meyer; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Robert S Weatherup; Lorenzo D'Arsié; Andrea Cabrero-Vilatela; Sabina Caneva; Raoul Blume; John Robertson; Robert Schloegl; Stephan Hofmann Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jamie O D Williams; Jack A Alexander-Webber; Jon S Lapington; Mervyn Roy; Ian B Hutchinson; Abhay A Sagade; Marie-Blandine Martin; Philipp Braeuninger-Weimer; Andrea Cabrero-Vilatela; Ruizhi Wang; Andrea De Luca; Florin Udrea; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Robert S Weatherup; Ashwin J Shahani; Zhu-Jun Wang; Ken Mingard; Andrew J Pollard; Marc-Georg Willinger; Robert Schloegl; Peter W Voorhees; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Andrea Cabrero-Vilatela; Robert S Weatherup; Philipp Braeuninger-Weimer; Sabina Caneva; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 7.790