Sabina Caneva1, Robert S Weatherup1,2, Bernhard C Bayer1,3, Raoul Blume4, Andrea Cabrero-Vilatela1, Philipp Braeuninger-Weimer1, Marie-Blandine Martin1, Ruizhi Wang1, Carsten Baehtz5, Robert Schloegl6, Jannik C Meyer3, Stephan Hofmann1. 1. Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge , JJ Thomson Avenue, CB3 0FA Cambridge, United Kingdom. 2. Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory , 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, California 94720, United States. 3. Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna , Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Vienna, Austria. 4. Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialen und Energie , D-12489 Berlin, Germany. 5. Institute of Radiation Physics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf , 01314 Dresden, Germany. 6. Fritz Haber Institute , D-14195 Berlin-Dahlem, Germany.
Abstract
Highly controlled Fe-catalyzed growth of monolayer hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) films is demonstrated by the dissolution of nitrogen into the catalyst bulk via NH3 exposure prior to the actual growth step. This "pre-filling" of the catalyst bulk reservoir allows us to control and limit the uptake of B and N species during borazine exposure and thereby to control the incubation time and h-BN growth kinetics while also limiting the contribution of uncontrolled precipitation-driven h-BN growth during cooling. Using in situ X-ray diffraction and in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy combined with systematic growth calibrations, we develop an understanding and framework for engineering the catalyst bulk reservoir to optimize the growth process, which is also relevant to other 2D materials and their heterostructures.
Highly controlled Fe-catalyzed growth of monolayer hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN) films is demonstrated by the dissolution of nitrogen into the catalyst bulk via NH3 exposure prior to the actual growth step. This "pre-filling" of the catalyst bulk reservoir allows us to control and limit the uptake of B and N species during borazine exposure and thereby to control the incubation time and h-BN growth kinetics while also limiting the contribution of uncontrolled precipitation-driven h-BN growth during cooling. Using in situ X-ray diffraction and in situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy combined with systematic growth calibrations, we develop an understanding and framework for engineering the catalyst bulk reservoir to optimize the growth process, which is also relevant to other 2D materials and their heterostructures.
Entities:
Keywords:
ammonia (NH3); borazine (HBNH)3; chemical vapor deposition (CVD); hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN); iron (Fe)
Hexagonal
boron nitride (h-BN) is a two-dimensional (2D) dielectric material
isostructural to graphene whose distinctive properties make it highly
promising as a barrier-, spacer-, or support-layer for future integrated
electronics and photonics.[1−3] A key technological challenge,
as for all 2D materials, is the scalable manufacture of h-BN, in particular
as a continuous film of controlled layer number, crystalline quality,
and microstructure.[4−6] Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) has emerged as the
most viable technique to address this, as it enables not only bulk
production but importantly also controlled interfacing and direct
material integration; that is, it enables integrated manufacturing.[7] Critical to the h-BN CVD process is the use of
a catalyst that, similar to graphene CVD, facilitates low activation
energy pathways for precursor dissociation, h-BN nucleation, domain
growth, and merging.[8−10] Mono- and few-layer h-BN CVD has been reported on
a range of transition metal catalysts;[11−25] however, the growth mechanisms under scalable conditions remain
unclear, thus limiting control over h-BN film structure as well as
the more complex direct CVD of 2D heterostructures.[26−28] The optimization
of the CVD process is typically focused on preparation of the catalyst
surface prior to the growth, for example, by mechanical or chemical
polishing,[11,29] and for the given choice of precursor
and its dilution, the temperature, pressure, and time of the actual
CVD growth step. The role of the reaction atmosphere during preannealing
has not been discussed in great detail in literature for 2D h-BN layers,
although it has been investigated for carbon and boron nitride nanotubes,
as well as for graphene CVD.[30−33]It has been shown that the boron (B) and nitrogen
(N) solubility and permeability are strongly catalyst dependent; for
instance, for common catalysts such as Fe or Cu, both species dissolve
in Fe, but only B dissolves in Cu to any significant level.[34,35] Typically, such non-negligible solubilities are considered deleterious
and have not been considered as parameters to enhance growth control.[36] The finite concentration of constituent elements
that can be dissolved into the catalyst bulk has two key implications:
(i) it can affect the catalyst phase evolution during CVD and (ii)
the resulting bulk reservoir effect can alter the growth kinetics.[37]Here, we show that the dissolution of
species into the catalyst bulk prior to the actual growth step can
be used to significantly improve the homogeneity and growth control
for h-BN CVD. We focus on Fe-catalyzed h-BN CVD with borazine and
show that Fe exposure to NH3 before the actual growth step
leads to the dissolution of N species into the Fe bulk. This “pre-filling”
of the catalyst bulk reservoir allows us to control and limit the
uptake of B and N species during borazine exposure and thereby limit
the contribution of precipitation-driven growth. It also enables us
to control the incubation time and growth kinetics, through which
we achieve exclusive growth of uniform monolayer h-BN films on Fe
foils. Using in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) and in situ X-ray photoelectron
spectroscopy (XPS) combined with a systematic growth study and ex
situ characterization, we develop an in-depth understanding of the
growth kinetics and possibilities for engineering the catalyst bulk
reservoir to optimize the CVD process. Our insights are relevant to
all catalyst materials and the kinetic growth model offers a general
framework relevant also to other 2D materials and their heterostructures.
Results
We adopt a simple CVD process, the salient stages of which are
outlined in Figure : (1) the preannealing stage, during which the samples are gradually
heated in H2 or NH3, (2) the vacuum stage preceding
borazine exposure, (3) the borazine exposure period, and (4) the vacuum
cooling stage. Figure compares the morphology of the h-BN grown on as-received Fe foils
(100 μm) at ∼900 °C and 6 × 10–4 mbar borazine partial pressure following preannealing in 4 mbar
of either H2 or NH3 (Stage 1) as a function
of borazine exposure time (Stage 3). We observe a strong effect of
the preannealing gas on the growth. In particular, for the NH3 preannealing, an increase in growth time results in a gradual
closure of the monolayer h-BN film, without multilayer formation.
Conversely, the H2 preannealing does not lead to a continuous,
homogeneous h-BN film even for extended growth times, and primarily
results in thicker, few-layer h-BN domains.
Figure 1
Schematic of the salient
stages of the CVD process. The shaded areas correspond to the preannealing
stage in either H2 or NH3 (1), the vacuum stage
prior to borazine exposure (2), the borazine exposure period (3),
and the vacuum cooling stage (4).
Figure 2
SEM images of h-BN domains grown at ∼900 °C and 6 ×
10–4 mbar borazine exposure on (a,b,c) H2-preannealed Fe foil for 45 s, 90 s, and 480 s borazine exposure
time, respectively, and on (d,e,f) NH3-preannealed Fe foil
for 45 s, 90 s, and 480 s borazine exposure time, respectively. The
preannealing pressure in both H2 and NH3 is
4 mbar for all of the above growths. The insets in (a,d) correspond
to 14 s exposures and illustrate the longer incubation time preceding
nucleation of h-BN on the H2-preannealed sample.
Schematic of the salient
stages of the CVD process. The shaded areas correspond to the preannealing
stage in either H2 or NH3 (1), the vacuum stage
prior to borazine exposure (2), the borazine exposure period (3),
and the vacuum cooling stage (4).SEM images of h-BN domains grown at ∼900 °C and 6 ×
10–4 mbar borazine exposure on (a,b,c) H2-preannealed Fe foil for 45 s, 90 s, and 480 s borazine exposure
time, respectively, and on (d,e,f) NH3-preannealed Fe foil
for 45 s, 90 s, and 480 s borazine exposure time, respectively. The
preannealing pressure in both H2 and NH3 is
4 mbar for all of the above growths. The insets in (a,d) correspond
to 14 s exposures and illustrate the longer incubation time preceding
nucleation of h-BN on the H2-preannealed sample.The average domain size for the
H2-preannealed sample is <1 μm after 45 s borazine
exposure (Figure a).
For a 14 s borazine exposure following a H2 preannealing
(Figure a inset) no
h-BN was observed on the Fe surface, indicative of an incubation period
preceding crystal nucleation of at least 14 s. We note that the h-BN
domain orientation, size, and density varies across the sample surface,
suggesting Fe grain orientation-dependent growth kinetics, a feature
that is also observed for the NH3-preannealed foil (see
Supporting Information Figure S1). After
90 s, the domains grow to average lateral sizes of ∼3 μm
(Figure b), and the
change in contrast from the edges to the center of the triangular
domains also indicates a notable thickness variation, with brighter
regions corresponding to multilayers and conversely dark gray regions
indicating monolayer h-BN. Extended growth times (480 s, Figure c) lead to slightly
higher h-BN coverages; however, growth appears to primarily proceed
through the formation of additional h-BN layers, rather than lateral
expansion of the existing layers. Additionally, we observe a bimodal
domain size distribution across the entire sample surface (Figure S2), with large domains (side length ∼15
μm) coexisting with domains about ten times smaller. This observation
suggests that two distinct growth regimes appear to exist under these
growth conditions for the H2 preannealing.For the
NH3-preannealed Fe foil, the most notable difference after
45 s borazine exposure is the formation of a lower density of triangular
domains with lateral dimensions of ∼20 μm (Figure d), which are more than ten
times the size of the domains grown on the H2-preannealed
Fe foil for the same exposure time. We also note that the edges are
sawtoothed, a feature that we have observed previously for large h-BN
domains grown on Fe/SiO2/Si substrates,[34] and which can be ascribed to diffusion instabilities.[38] The incubation time for the NH3-preannealed
catalyst is shorter, highlighted by the appearance of triangular domains
after just 14 s of borazine exposure (Figure d inset). The h-BN domains are largely merged
after 90 s exposure (Figure e), with only a few gaps left in the film. After 480 s of
borazine exposure, we achieve full coverage of the Fe catalyst with
monolayer h-BN (Figure f). The remaining variations in SEM contrast over the surface of
the sample are due to channeling contrast from the polycrystalline
Fe foil.Figure summarizes the effect of three different cooling rates (Stage 4
in Figure ) on the
h-BN morphology after growth on the differently preannealed foils
(H2 or NH3, 4 mbar), followed by a fixed borazine
exposure (6 × 10–4 mbar, ∼ 900 °C,
5 min). We note that the cooling rates refer to the initial cooling
period from ∼900 °C down to ∼500 °C, after
which the rate slows down and is comparable for all three cases. Figure a corresponds to
immediate quenching (∼300 °C/min) for a H2-preannealed
foil, with the heater turned off immediately after borazine exposure,
and shows a bimodal domain size distribution of few-layer h-BN. For
an intermediate cooling rate of 100 °C/min, the h-BN domains
appear larger and more multilayered, and the density of the smaller
domains is considerably higher (Figure b), indicating that some portion of the h-BN is formed
on cooling. For slow cooling rates of 50 °C/min, the domains
are similar in size and thickness to the intermediate cooling rate;
however, the shapes are no longer strictly triangular and the edges
become less sharp (Figure c inset). The same cooling experiments were performed on the
NH3-preannealed foils (Figure d–f). The h-BN domains remain as monolayers,
with no multilayers observed for any of the cooling rates used here.
This illustrates that, contrary to the H2-preannealing
case, additional layer formation and nucleation do not occur on cooling,
both of which are effects that can be linked to precipitation of B
and N species from the catalyst bulk.
Figure 3
Morphology of h-BN on H2-preannealed
Fe foil after (a) fast cooling (300 °C), (b) medium cooling (100
°C/min), and (c) slow cooling (50 °C/min). Inset: detail
of multilayered domains with irregular edges, indicating possible
dissolution of material back into the bulk during slow cooling. Morphology
of h-BN on NH3-preannealed Fe foil after (d) fast cooling,
(e) medium cooling, and (f) slow cooling. All growths were performed
at ∼900 °C and 6 × 10–4 mbar borazine
exposure for 5 min.
Morphology of h-BN on H2-preannealed
Fe foil after (a) fast cooling (300 °C), (b) medium cooling (100
°C/min), and (c) slow cooling (50 °C/min). Inset: detail
of multilayered domains with irregular edges, indicating possible
dissolution of material back into the bulk during slow cooling. Morphology
of h-BN on NH3-preannealed Fe foil after (d) fast cooling,
(e) medium cooling, and (f) slow cooling. All growths were performed
at ∼900 °C and 6 × 10–4 mbar borazine
exposure for 5 min.To further understand
this difference in behavior with preannealing atmosphere, we performed
a growth where we first preannealed the sample in NH3,
and then held it at the growth temperature in vacuum for 30 min after the NH3 preanneal but prior to borazine exposure (i.e., extended Stage 2 in Figure ). Figure S3 shows the postgrowth surface of this sample, which consists
of a h-BN domain size distribution tending to be more bimodal than
for the standard growth with the NH3 preannealing. Furthermore,
most of the domains are smaller and multilayered, and are reminiscent
of those grown on the H2-preanneled sample, despite the
lower nucleation density.The structure and crystallinity of
the h-BN formed by the optimized process using NH3 preanneling
was determined by transmission electron microscopy (TEM)/scanning
transmission electron microscopy (STEM). Figure a shows a scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
image of a holey carbon/copper TEM grid after transferring isolated
h-BN domains corresponding to Figure d. Figure b shows a dark-field TEM (DF-TEM) image of one such h-BN island,
confirming the single-crystalline nature of the domain. The corresponding
selected area electron diffraction pattern (upper right inset) shows
one hexagonal set of diffraction spots also consistent with single-crystalline
h-BN. The green circle indicates the diffraction spot used to produce
the DF-TEM image. The lower right inset shows a defocused bright-field
(BF) TEM image confirming that the domain is indeed isolated, and
a second differently oriented h-BN domain can be partially seen in
the lower left corner. We further analyze the film by high angle annular
dark field (HAADF) STEM, which reveals atomic and element specific
contrast.[39] The high-resolution STEM image
in Figure c displays
the hexagonal lattice of h-BN and the intensity profile along the
marked yellow line exhibits a clear distinction of the B and N atoms
(Figure c inset),
where the extracted intensity ratio is consistent with monolayer h-BN.[39] Further confirmation of the monolayer nature
of the h-BN was obtained by electron beam induced sputtering in Supporting
Information Figure S4, which exhibits direct,
step-free sputtering of the layer to vacuum consistent with single-layer
h-BN (whereas multilayer h-BN is sputtered in a layer-by-layer fashion).[40−42]Figure d shows a
bright-field TEM image of a suspended closed h-BN film, with the corresponding
diffraction pattern and film edge close-up (top left and bottom right
insets, respectively), demonstrating the crystalline and monolayer
properties of the material. An optical image of h-BN domains transferred
onto a SiO2(300 nm)/Si wafer, acquired with a green filter
to enhance the contrast with the substrate, is shown in Figure e. The Raman spectrum from
the area indicated by the red dot (Figure f) exhibits a peak at 1369 cm–1, in agreement with literature values for CVD h-BN.[43]
Figure 4
(a) SEM image of h-BN domains from Figure d transferred onto a holey carbon/copper
TEM grid. (b) DF-TEM image of a triangular h-BN domain, confirming
its single-crystalline nature. We note that the image is composed
of several stitched individual frames. The upper right inset shows
the corresponding hexagonal diffraction pattern with the diffraction
spot, from which the DF-TEM image was acquired, indicated by the green
circle. The lower right inset shows a defocused BF-TEM image demonstrating
that the island is indeed isolated. (c) High-angle annular dark field
(HAADF) STEM image from the
center of a triangular domain showing atomic and element specific
contrast. The image was processed following Krivanek et al. to reduce
contributions from probe-tails.[39] The intensity
profile along the indicated yellow line (inset) exhibits an N/B intensity
ratio consistent with monolayer h-BN.[39] (d) Bright-field TEM image of a suspended h-BN film from the sample
in Figure f. The top
left inset shows the diffraction pattern from this region and the
bottom right inset is an edge-analysis, confirming the monolayer nature
of the film. (e) Optical image after transfer of the sample in Figure e, showing coalescing
h-BN domains. We note that the image was acquired using a green filter
to enhance the contrast. (f) Raman spectrum acquired in the region
indicated by the red dot in panel (e), displaying the characteristic
h-BN peak at 1369 cm–1 and the Si-related peak.[59]
(a) SEM image of h-BN domains from Figure d transferred onto a holey carbon/copper
TEM grid. (b) DF-TEM image of a triangular h-BN domain, confirming
its single-crystalline nature. We note that the image is composed
of several stitched individual frames. The upper right inset shows
the corresponding hexagonal diffraction pattern with the diffraction
spot, from which the DF-TEM image was acquired, indicated by the green
circle. The lower right inset shows a defocused BF-TEM image demonstrating
that the island is indeed isolated. (c) High-angle annular dark field
(HAADF) STEM image from the
center of a triangular domain showing atomic and element specific
contrast. The image was processed following Krivanek et al. to reduce
contributions from probe-tails.[39] The intensity
profile along the indicated yellow line (inset) exhibits an N/B intensity
ratio consistent with monolayer h-BN.[39] (d) Bright-field TEM image of a suspended h-BN film from the sample
in Figure f. The top
left inset shows the diffraction pattern from this region and the
bottom right inset is an edge-analysis, confirming the monolayer nature
of the film. (e) Optical image after transfer of the sample in Figure e, showing coalescing
h-BN domains. We note that the image was acquired using a green filter
to enhance the contrast. (f) Raman spectrum acquired in the region
indicated by the red dot in panel (e), displaying the characteristic
h-BN peak at 1369 cm–1 and the Si-related peak.[59]In order to elucidate the growth mechanisms responsible for
the differing h-BN morphologies observed in Figure , we employ in situ XRD and in situ XPS during growth. Figure compares in situ XRD patterns acquired during H2- (a) and NH3-preannealed (b) h-BN growth. The
as-loaded catalyst foils display reflections corresponding to body-centered-cubic
(bcc) α-Fe. For the H2 preannealing (Figure a), the foils transform to
face-centered-cubic (fcc) γ-Fe upon heating and concurrently
grain growth occurs (shown via a sharpening of the reflections). We
note that in our experimental setup the large Fe grain sizes (∼80
μm estimated from SEM) result in the diffraction pattern originating
from only a few grains, and hence, the measured apparent texture directions
are not necessarily representative of the texture of the entire foil.
Upon introduction of borazine following the H2 preannealing,
a strong reflection at 18° is observed, which is ascribed to
isothermal growth of few-layer h-BN, accompanied by multiple sharp
reflections at higher angles that can be attributed to the formation
of a small amount of Fe-borides (Fe2B, and possibly FeB).
Furthermore, the majority catalyst phase changes from γ-Fe to
α-Fe (with possibly small amounts of γ-Fe remaining).
After cooling to room temperature, the catalyst state consists of
mostly α-Fe with some minor Fe-borides and possibly some γ-Fe.
The observed Fe-boride formation and the isothermal γ-Fe →
α-Fe transition are both indicative of B uptake into the Fe
and are consistent with our recent work on H2-preannealed
h-BN growth on Fe films.[34]
Figure 5
In situ XRD patterns
of Fe foil catalyzed h-BN growth during the salient stages of the
CVD process, comparing the H2 preannealing (a) and the
NH3 preannealing (b). The labeling indicates possible phase
assignments with less likely phase assignments in brackets. We note
that intensity is plotted here on a log scale to emphasize minority
phases. The catalyst was annealed in 2.6 mbar of H2 (a)
and 4 mbar of NH3 (b), and the growth was performed at
∼900 °C (estimated uncertainty in temperature ±25
°C) in ∼6 × 10–4 mbar borazine
partial pressure for 10 min.
In situ XRD patterns
of Fe foil catalyzed h-BN growth during the salient stages of the
CVD process, comparing the H2 preannealing (a) and the
NH3 preannealing (b). The labeling indicates possible phase
assignments with less likely phase assignments in brackets. We note
that intensity is plotted here on a log scale to emphasize minority
phases. The catalyst was annealed in 2.6 mbar of H2 (a)
and 4 mbar of NH3 (b), and the growth was performed at
∼900 °C (estimated uncertainty in temperature ±25
°C) in ∼6 × 10–4 mbar borazine
partial pressure for 10 min.In contrast, the NH3 preannealing (Figure b) leads to a very different
evolution: upon preannealing in NH3 the majority catalyst
phase changes from α-Fe to γ-Fe (as with H2 preannealing). However, although the XRD pattern for NH3 preannealing can be fully assigned to γ-Fe, we note that the
comparably broad peak at ∼30° could also correspond to
the highest intensity reflection of ε-Fe3N (not observed
for H2 preannealing), which requires N uptake into the
Fe foil. We corroborate such N uptake by control experiments on Fe(250
nm)/SiO2(300 nm)/Si which are exposed to the same NH3 preannealing annealing conditions. Although trace levels
of diffused Si have to be considered for these films,[34] the lower degree of texture allows Rietveld refinement
of lattice constants. Upon NH3 exposure over a vacuum baseline,
we find a lattice expansion corresponding to 0.6 atom % N uptake[44] into the bulk of the γ-Fe films (Figure S5), confirming that N dissolves into
the Fe under our NH3 preannealing conditions. When borazine
is introduced, the preceding NH3 preannealing impacts on
the further catalyst evolution: in contrast to the H2-preannealed
foil, γ-Fe remains the majority catalyst phase and neither Fe-borides
are formed nor is a γ-Fe → α-Fe transition observed
during borazine exposure. Additionally, we do not observe the emergence
of a few-layer h-BN related reflection at ∼18°. This lack
of a signal corresponding to thick h-BN films is consistent with the
exclusive monolayer h-BN growth observed in our ex situ characterization
above (we note that our XRD setup cannot detect monolayer h-BN;[35] however, monolayer h-BN growth was confirmed
by ex situ SEM for the NH3-preannealed sample grown during
in situ XRD). During cooling to room temperature, after borazine exposure,
a γ-Fe → α-Fe transition[44] occurs. The additional emergence of Fe4N reflections
upon cooling (which were not observed in the H2 preannealing
data) further corroborates N uptake into the catalyst during the NH3-preannealed h-BN CVD. Fe4N is only thermodynamically
stable below 680 °C,[44] which explains
why Fe4N only nucleates upon cooling.In situ XPS
data summarized in Figure provides complementary, surface-sensitive information on
the h-BN nucleation and growth processes. We note that the assignment
of all the XPS peaks and their corresponding shifts is not trivial
for such a complex multicomponent system. Hence, we focus here on
the main signatures of h-BN CVD and the major differences arising
from the two preannealings. Figure a–d show the time-resolved evolution of the
XP B1s and N1s core level spectra
for a Fe foil preannealed at ∼900 °C in either H2 (a,c) or NH3 (b,d) and subsequently exposed to borazine.
The borazine exposure time (measured from the time at which the desired
exposure pressure is reached) for each scan prior to cooling is indicated
in the top left corner of each frame. Two main peak pairs are observed
for both preannealings and are related to the h-BN structure, where
the B atom is bonded to three N atoms in a planar hexagonal configuration.[45] The B/N peak pair with higher binding energies
(BE) are centered at 190.5/397.9 eV and the lower BE pair at 189.9/397.5
eV. Both pairs can relate to monolayer h-BN and can arise due to differences
in coupling between the h-BN layer and the catalyst. In particular,
effects such as different grain orientations, intercalation, and rippling/restructuring
of the surface are known to change the interaction of the overlying
2D film with the substrate.[35] The increase
in the intensity of the lower BE pair is then tentatively attributed
to few-layer h-BN:[46] on the basis of our
previous work on Cu-catalyzed h-BN CVD,[35] we note that although the first h-BN layer in direct contact with
the catalyst does show such coupling effects, for few-layer h-BN this
interaction can be screened. Hence, an increasing peak intensity of
the lower BE pair here can be indicative of the presence of few-layer
h-BN. For the H2-preannealed foil during the initial exposure
to borazine, the peaks of both the high and low BE pairs appear concurrently,
with the low BE pair dominating. This is consistent with our SEM images
showing the growth of multilayered islands for very short exposure
times. With continuing borazine exposure, the relative peak intensity
of the lower BE pair continues to rise, indicative of a thickening
of the h-BN domains, and then increases even further upon cooling.
An ex situ SEM image corresponding to this sample is shown in Figure S6a. In contrast, for the NH3-preannealed foil, the high BE pair is more intense in the early
stages of growth, relative to the H2 preannealing, indicating
isothermal growth of predominantly monolayer h-BN on Fe. The fact
that the low BE pair dominates for the rest of the growth suggests
that few-layer h-BN evolves with extended exposure time, which is
indeed observed in the ex situ SEM image of this sample taken after
growth and cooling (Figure S6b). Though
the XPS growth results differ somewhat from those of our well-calibrated
reactor and the optimized growths in Figure d–f, we attribute this to the different
conditions in the XPS chamber, notably the much lower base pressure
[∼10–9 mbar] and the lower permissible pressure
of NH3 [∼0.5 mbar]. Effectively, the in situ XPS
experiments resemble the CVD growth with an extended Stage 2, where
insufficient N-enrichment of the catalyst bulk causes the formation
of h-BN multilayers. We note that the slightly different ratio of
the two BE components between the B1s and the corresponding
N1s (bottom two frames, Figure ) for the NH3 case can be attributed
to the fact that the N1s spectra were always acquired
after the B1s spectra, that is, with a typical time
lag of 1 min, the N1s spectra thus correspond to
a later stage of the growth. The increase in the intensity of the
two peak pairs with extended borazine exposure (as apparent from the
different intensity scalings of each frame) confirms that, regardless
of the preannealing, h-BN formation occurs isothermally, which is
in agreement with our in situ XRD measurements and ex situ SEM observations.
We further note that for the H2 preannealing case, a minor
contribution from bulk precipitation upon cooling is also observed
(Figure a–c).
Conversely, for the NH3 preannealing case no signatures
of precipitation are observed, even for very slow cooling rates (Figure d–f).
Figure 6
Time-resolved
in situ XPS of the B1s core level for (a) H2- and (b) NH3-preannealed Fe foil and the N1s core level for (c) H2- and (d) NH3-preannealed
Fe foil during borazine exposure and initial cooling stage (∼900
°C, ∼ 1 × 10–4 mbar for NH3-preannealed sample and ∼1 × 10–3 mbar for H2-preannealed sample, ∼ 10 min). Spectra
are collected in normal emission geometry at photon energies of 620
eV (λescape ≈ 13 Å).
Time-resolved
in situ XPS of the B1s core level for (a) H2- and (b) NH3-preannealed Fe foil and the N1s core level for (c) H2- and (d) NH3-preannealed
Fe foil during borazine exposure and initial cooling stage (∼900
°C, ∼ 1 × 10–4 mbar for NH3-preannealed sample and ∼1 × 10–3 mbar for H2-preannealed sample, ∼ 10 min). Spectra
are collected in normal emission geometry at photon energies of 620
eV (λescape ≈ 13 Å).Figure a,b
show depth-resolved B1s core level spectra taken
after borazine exposure and cooling for H2- and NH3-preannealed foils, respectively. By changing the incident
X-ray energies, and hence the inelastic mean free path of the photoelectrons
(λescape), the information depth can be varied, giving
a more surface sensitive spectrum (λescape ≈
10 Å) for hv = 400 eV and a more bulk sensitive
(λescape ≈ 13 Å) spectrum for hv = 640 eV. For the H2-preannealed foil, we
assign the component at ∼188 eV to B-related species (dissolved
B or borides)[46−50] and note that this component does not have a corresponding pair
in the N1s spectrum, as would be expected. Comparison
of the relative intensities of this component shows that the B-related
species are stronger in the more bulk sensitive spectra (Figure a inset), which is
consistent with our XRD analysis, where we demonstrate that species
present at higher concentrations in the catalyst bulk can segregate
toward the surface during cooling, leading to the formation of additional
phases (i.e., borides for H2 preannealing and nitrides
for NH3 preannealing). Interestingly, the component at
∼188 eV is not detected for the NH3-preannealed
foil, neither in the surface sensitive scan nor in the more bulk sensitive
scan (Figure b). This
is consistent with the B uptake being significantly reduced by the
presence of N dissolved in the Fe bulk from the NH3 preannealing
step. Both preannealings lead to the appearance of a small peak at
∼200 eV, which has been attributed to the π–π*
plasmon shake up satellite corresponding to sp2 bonded
hexagonal boron nitride.[51−53] This satellite is not detected
for c-BN.[53] The sharper satellite peak
for the NH3-preannealed sample attests to the higher quality
of the h-BN grown (Figure b inset).
Figure 7
Depth-resolved in situ XPS B1s core level
lines measured at room temperature in vacuum for (a) H2- and (b) NH3-preannealed Fe foil after borazine exposure
and cooling (growth parameters: ∼900 °C, ∼1 ×
10–4 mbar for NH3-preannealed sample
and ∼1 × 10–3 mbar for H2-preannealed sample, ∼ 10 min borazine exposure time). The
spectra are collected at photon energies of 400 eV (surface sensitive;
λescape ≈ 10 Å) and 640 eV (bulk sensitive;
λescape ≈ 13 Å).
Depth-resolved in situ XPS B1s core level
lines measured at room temperature in vacuum for (a) H2- and (b) NH3-preannealed Fe foil after borazine exposure
and cooling (growth parameters: ∼900 °C, ∼1 ×
10–4 mbar for NH3-preannealed sample
and ∼1 × 10–3 mbar for H2-preannealed sample, ∼ 10 min borazine exposure time). The
spectra are collected at photon energies of 400 eV (surface sensitive;
λescape ≈ 10 Å) and 640 eV (bulk sensitive;
λescape ≈ 13 Å).We also find that the onset of h-BN growth is strongly dependent
on the borazine partial pressure, as summarized in Figure S7. For a given constant temperature, upon introducing
∼1 × 10–4 mbar of borazine, the N1s and B1s scans for both types of preannealed
foils exhibit flat lines, indicating the absence of h-BN growth. After
9 min at ∼1 × 10–4 mbar of borazine,
the N1s and B1s scans for the H2-preannealed sample remain flat. Small N1s and B1s peaks only start appearing for an increased
borazine partial pressure of ∼7 × 10–4 mbar. For the H2-preannealed sample, significant h-BN
growth is achieved by further increasing the borazine pressure to
∼1 × 10–3 mbar. We note that the sample
was exposed to ∼7 × 10–4 mbar of borazine
for 15 min before increasing the pressure to ∼1 × 10–3 mbar, and then exposed to this pressure for a further
20 min. In contrast, after 3 min of borazine exposure at ∼1
× 10–4 mbar of borazine, a notable peak appears
in both N1s and B1s scans for the
NH3-preannealed sample, which corresponds to h-BN nucleation.
Upon continued exposure (6 min) at this same pressure, the peaks increase
in intensity as the h-BN domains grow further. Combined, our in situ
XRD and in situ XPS characterizations suggest a strong influence of
NH3 preannealing not only on h-BN growth but also on the
underlying catalyst phase evolution and B/N uptake mechanisms.
Discussion
Our data reveals that the contribution of the Fe bulk reservoir
is critical in determining the h-BN growth behavior. Although other
catalysts offer much lower B and N solubilities such that precipitation-driven
growth is minimized, our focus here on Fe substrates is motivated
by our previous work, which shows Fe to be an excellent catalyst for
high-quality h-BN growth.[34] In fact, we
are able to use the bulk solubility of B and N in Fe
as a key advantage, and hence achieve better growth control using
a bulk prefilling method, as discussed below. Similarly, a finite
carbon solubility has previously been shown to substantially improve
graphene growth uniformity on polycrystalline Ni and Co substrates,
where the catalyst bulk acts as a mediating carbon sink that moderates
variations in growth across different catalyst grains.[37,54]Figure schematically
summarizes the processes taking place during the salient stages of
the CVD process on Fe foils, comparing the effects of the H2 and NH3 preannealing on the catalyst chemistry and on
the growth of h-BN (Figure a,b), and interpreting them in the context of ternary phase
diagram considerations (Figure ). The two suggested growth pathways are summarized in the
Fe-rich corner of the Fe–B–N phase diagram at 950 °C,[55] and are marked by the red and blue arrows, denoting
the H2 and NH3 preannealing routes, respectively.
The phase diagram is applicable to our experiments given that the
changes in the phase boundaries between the sections at 950 and 1050
°C are minimal,[55] and temperature
uncertainties of ±50 °C in commercial CVD reactors are not
untypical. In the framework of our discussion, we assume that the
B and N diffusivity does not vary significantly depending on their
relative proportions but is only dependent on temperature.
Figure 8
Schematic illustrating
the near-surface region of the Fe catalyst and the proposed mechanisms
involved in the growth of h-BN, comparing the (a) H2- and
(b) NH3-preannealed foils respectively during different
CVD stages. The downward and upward arrows indicate species diffusing
into and out of the catalyst, respectively. [1], [2], [3], and [4]
represent the state of the catalyst during preannealing, short borazine
exposure, long borazine exposure, and vacuum cooling, respectively.
Figure 9
Fe-rich corner of the Fe–B–N phase
diagram at 950 °C (adapted from Rogl and Schuster).[55] The red and blue arrows represent the reaction
pathway for the H2- and NH3-preannealed foils
respectively with the corresponding postgrowth SEM images of the sample
surface. The scalebars are 20 μm.
Schematic illustrating
the near-surface region of the Fe catalyst and the proposed mechanisms
involved in the growth of h-BN, comparing the (a) H2- and
(b) NH3-preannealed foils respectively during different
CVD stages. The downward and upward arrows indicate species diffusing
into and out of the catalyst, respectively. [1], [2], [3], and [4]
represent the state of the catalyst during preannealing, short borazine
exposure, long borazine exposure, and vacuum cooling, respectively.Fe-rich corner of the Fe–B–N phase
diagram at 950 °C (adapted from Rogl and Schuster).[55] The red and blue arrows represent the reaction
pathway for the H2- and NH3-preannealed foils
respectively with the corresponding postgrowth SEM images of the sample
surface. The scalebars are 20 μm.CVD of a compound material, such as h-BN, requires simultaneous
feeding of B and N species into the growing stoichiometric crystal,
which presents a more complex scenario compared to graphene growth,
where only C atoms need to be incorporated into the graphitic lattice.
First, we outline the B and N fluxes necessary for h-BN CVD, involving
precursor dissociation and the formation of h-BN domains. The impingement
of borazine molecules and their dissociation provides a flux of B
and N species at the catalyst surface. Concurrently, a flux of B and
N dissolving into the catalyst bulk will deplete the surface. A net
flux is required for h-BN growth, which is equal to the difference
between the flux reaching the surface and that diffusing into the
catalyst. During the initial stages of borazine dosing these two fluxes
will be matched and no h-BN nucleation occurs (i.e., incubation period).
However, the concentration of B and N at the surface will start to
increase gradually until a critical supersaturation at the Fe surface
is reached, giving rise to the first h-BN nucleation events. Following
nucleation, growth of h-BN islands will proceed, fed by the net flux
resulting from the precursor dissociation at the surface and the diffusion
into the catalyst bulk. We briefly outline the importance of the bulk
reservoir to CVD growth on catalysts with finite solubilities of the
precursor species.[37] For h-BN CVD on catalysts
with significant B and N solubilities (such as Fe), the supply of
B and N to the catalyst surface to feed h-BN growth is mediated by
their diffusion into the catalyst bulk. This allows uniform h-BN to
be formed over the catalyst by locally saturating the catalyst close
to the surface, while the bulk continues to provide a sink for B and
N species. However, if the catalyst becomes saturated with these species
throughout its bulk during the growth process, then the bulk of the
catalyst no longer acts as a mediating sink and inhomogeneous few-layer
h-BN can readily form isothermally, as well as by the precipitation
of B and N to the surface upon cool-down. How quickly the catalyst
becomes saturated throughout its thickness is ultimately dictated
by its permeability (i.e., the product of solubility and diffusivity).
Thus, low permeabilities, relative to the rate of B and N delivery
to the catalyst surface, favor a broad processing window for monolayer
h-BN formation, and hence, it is highly desirable to be able to control
this property.[54]We first consider
the H2 preannealing case. During preannealing up to ∼900
°C (Figure a[1]),
the Fe surface undergoes a reduction reaction of Fe oxides,[56] formed from ambient air storage of the foils,
accompanied by the phase transformation α-Fe → γ-Fe,
as confirmed by the XRD data in Figure a. On precursor exposure, uptake of both B and N from
the dissociation of borazine is confirmed by XRD, which shows the
formation of borides and an expansion of the Fe lattice due to N dissolution
for similar growth conditions.[34] The catalyst
reservoir is therefore partially filled by the constituent species,
illustrated by the downward red and blue arrows in Figure a[2], and results in a longer
incubation time for crystal growth because the critical supersaturation
required for nucleation will take longer to achieve. This is consistent
with the ternary Fe–B–N phase diagram, in which the
curve in the solvus for intermediate B:N ratios is crossed at relatively
high solubilies, and hence high permeabilities, of both species. At
such intermediate B:N ratios, it is not clear which of the species
it is whose supply is the limiting factor that controls the growth.
After 10 min of borazine exposure, the XRD data shows the appearance
of the few-layer h-BN reflection at ∼18°, demonstrating
that growth of additional h-BN layers occurs isothermally (small triangular
domains in Figure a[3]). This is further confirmed by in situ XPS, which additionally
reveals the concurrent appearance of h-BN mono- and multilayers (Figure a,c).Upon
borazine removal and cooling (Figure b,c), we show that further nucleation of new domains
and thickening of existing domains occurs for relatively slow cooling
rates on H2-preannealed foils. The fact that the h-BN domain
edges appear to be dissolving for a cooling rate of 50 °C/min
(Figure c inset) could
be explained by considering that while the catalyst surface is saturated
with B and N during growth, the catalyst is not saturated throughout
the bulk (i.e., the B and N concentration is not uniform across the
depth). Thus, the slow cooling rate is effectively equivalent to a
postanneal, which can result in the increased diffusion of B and N
into the catalyst bulk, decreasing the concentration of B and N near
the catalyst surface and leading to the partial dissolution of the
existing domains. For rapid quenching, a smaller contribution to growth
from bulk precipitation is also expected (Figure a[4]). We note that although we show clear
evidence of B and N uptake in the Fe bulk, this does not necessarily
imply precipitation into h-BN upon cooling because the assembly of
an h-BN domain requires a stoichiometric arrangement of atoms in the
hexagonal lattice. For monoelemental systems such as C, growth of
a graphic lattice by precipitation on cooling is simpler because only
one element needs to be incorporated at the growth front. For compound
materials like h-BN, this becomes less trivial. However, our ex situ
SEM indicates that precipitation-driven growth does in fact occur.
This can be explained by noting that the high permeabilities of B
and N that saturate the catalyst surface (evidenced by boride formation
and N-induced Fe lattice expansion in XRD, as well as dissolved B/borides
in the Fe subsurface observed by in situ XPS) can lead to inhomogeneous
isothermal multilayer growth, as well as further multilayer formation
upon cooling. The compositional trajectory for the H2-preannealed
foil can thus be summarized by the red arrow in Figure , which—starting in the γ-Fe
phase field—crosses the boundary γ-Fe → γ-Fe
+ h-BN + Fe2B during simultaneous feeding of N and B from
borazine dissociation. In terms of growth modes, the formation of
h-BN is predominantly isothermal, with a small contribution from bulk
precipitation on immediate cooling, which is relatively minor given
that the diffusivity of species rapidly decreases with temperature.The chemical and structural changes in the Fe catalyst for the
NH3-preannealed foil are markedly different. For the preannealed
sample, we measure a lattice expansion of the Fe due to N uptake[44] corresponding to ∼0.6 atom % N (downward
blue arrows in Figure b[1]), and possibly due to the additional formation of ε-Fe3N as a minority phase. We note that the Fe–N phase
diagram does not predict the presence of ε-Fe3N at
the temperatures and N content of our experiment; therefore, the contribution
to the small reflection at ∼30° in Figure b during preannealing is most likely due
to γ-Fe. The presence of N in Fe has been shown to significantly
reduce the α-Fe → γ-Fe transformation temperature,[44] from 912 °C for phase-pure Fe to 875 °C
for Fe-0.6 atom % N, which is therefore in line with our XRD phase
assignment. As a consequence of the N enrichment before borazine dosing,
the B:N ratio in the bulk of the foil is close to zero during dosing.
Due to the shape of the solvus, crossing it to form h-BN only requires
a small fraction of added B (∼0.002 at% B).[55] The fact that borides are not detected effectively means
that the solubility, and thus permeability, of B is greatly reduced
when the catalyst is saturated throughout with N. With lower B permeability,
the supersaturation required to form an h-BN nucleus therefore will
be reached for lower borazine partial pressures compared to the H2-preannealed foil or for shorter exposure times at the same
borazine exposure pressure. The first case is clearly supported by
the in situ XPS measurements. As shown in Figure S7, the borazine partial pressure required for h-BN growth
at ∼900 °C depends on the preannealing performed and is
found to be ∼1 × 10–3 mbar for the H2-preannealed foil, upon which growth is immediately observed,
and ∼1 × 10–4 mbar for the NH3-preannealed foil where h-BN begins to form after 3 min of borazine
exposure. We also confirm a shorter incubation time under the same
borazine exposure pressure for NH3-preannealed foils compared
to H2-preannealed foils through SEM characterization (Figure a,d insets). The
ex situ SEM images show that as we start dosing borazine, the nucleation
of h-BN domains occurs much more rapidly on the NH3-preannealed
foil, with triangular-shaped islands already observed after 14 s exposure
(Figure b[2]). For
longer exposure times the domains continue to grow laterally and neighboring
domains start to coalesce. Contrary to the H2 preannealing
case, we do not detect the isothermal γ-Fe phase transformation
to α-Fe. This, together with the lack of borides, both of which
are processes linked to B uptake,[34] reinforces
the conclusion that the NH3-preannealing and the corresponding
N uptake into the catalyst limits B diffusion into the Fe during subsequent
borazine exposure, that is, given that the B and N solubilities are
interdependent, the high N concentration in γ-Fe makes the corresponding
B permeability very low. Additionally, the limited amount of B in
the bulk reduces the likelihood of multilayer formation on cooling,
as only N can escape from the sample surface. We note that during
dosing at temperature, and in the absence of NH3 to replenish
the bulk with N, these species can diffuse back out to the surface
where they can leave as N2 (upward blue arrows in Figure b[3]). Indeed, Figure S3 provides evidence demonstrating that
the beneficial effect of the bulk N can be lost by long annealing
times in vacuum prior to borazine exposure. Hence, to achieve uniform
monolayer films, Stage 2 (Figure ) should be kept as short as possible.The XRD
data in Figure b illustrates
that during growth, and subsequently during simultaneous cooling and
borazine removal, we do not detect the appearance of the reflection
at ∼18° for the NH3 preannealing case, confirming
that the h-BN thickness does not increase significantly. This is corroborated
by ex situ SEM (Figure d–f), which shows that the h-BN remains as monolayers for
these growth conditions. Indeed, the SEM images in Figure d–f are further proof
that multilayers do not appear during cooling, even for slow cooling
rates, which typically allow sufficient time for species to segregate
at the surface, indicating a lack of B atoms that can be supplied
from the bulk. The main difference compared with the H2-preannealing case is that B is now the limiting factor that governs
the growth, which thus becomes kinetically controlled.[37] In this regime, it therefore is possible to
exclusively grow monolayer h-BN on a N-prefilled catalyst, as long
as the extent of B diffusion into the catalyst bulk remains limited
(Figure b[4]). On
the basis of our experimental evidence, we propose that for the NH3-preannealed foil, the compositional pathway runs along the
Fe–N edge in the γ-Fe phase field during annealing (Figure , long blue arrow),
because no B is supplied at this stage and only N dissolves into the
Fe. Upon subsequent borazine dosing, the trajectory crosses the boundary
into the γ-Fe + h-BN + N2 phase field (short blue
arrow) based on the isothermal growth of h-BN monolayers observed
in combined SEM, XRD, and XPS.Our current work shows that the
general bulk-mediated growth model reported here is also applicable
to graphene CVD on Fe foils using a C2H2 carbon
source. Analogously to the h-BN growth, we observe reduced incubation
times for NH3-preannealed foils (i.e., N-filled bulk reservoir)
compared to vacuum-annealed foils (unfilled bulk reservoir). The data
will be presented in future work; however, it demonstrates the robustness
and wide applicability of our model, which is anticipated to be relevant
for the fabrication of heterostructures. Indeed, the use of a catalyst
prefilling method for growth control has previously been used in other
material systems. A notable example is the catalytic growth of Si/Ge
heterostructure nanowires (NWs) with compositionally abrupt interfaces,
which requires the minimization of the solubility of Si and Ge in
the liquid Au catalyst in order to reduce the catalyst bulk reservoir
effect.[57,58]
Conclusion
In summary, a significant
level of improvement in the growth of h-BN is achieved through a bulk
reservoir filling effect in an as-received Fe foil by predosing N,
one of the constituent species, in the form of NH3 during
preannealing. Using in situ XRD and XPS, we demonstrate how N-induced
changes to the Fe catalyst phase evolution and composition directly
impact the h-BN incubation time and the uptake of B and N species
during dosing. These critical parameters then determine structural
h-BN features, such as number of layers, domain size, and nucleation
density.When the catalyst bulk is enriched with N from the
high temperature and high pressure preannealing in NH3,
the diffusion of B and N species in the Fe subsurface during subsequent
borazine exposure is limited. This effectively prevents significant
additional h-BN layer formation that typically occurs by precipitation
upon cooling, and which is indeed observed for H2-preannealed
Fe foils (i.e., unfilled bulk reservoir). Bulk filling also leads
to shorter incubation times and lower borazine partial pressures required
to nucleate h-BN, which reduces the probability of multilayer formation
and a large domain size distribution.Preannealing the catalyst
with NH3 allows us to control the subsequent uptake of
precursor species during dosing. Importantly, given the interdependency
of the B and N solubilities, it allows us to lower the permeability
of B, which leads to uniform h-BN monolayer growth. The catalyst bulk
prefilling method presented here therefore provides an elegant alternative
to using different catalysts or using catalyst alloying to control
the permeability of the growth species. The general model that we
derive, based on complementary ex situ and in situ data, in combination
with phase diagram considerations, forms a coherent picture of the
key bulk contributions to growth control and, importantly, is applicable
to other catalytically grown 2D materials.
Methods
h-BN Growth
As-received Fe foil (0.1 mm, Alfa Aesar, 99.99% purity) is used
for all experiments. The h-BN domains and films are grown in a customized
Aixtron BM3 cold-wall reactor (base pressure 1 × 10–6 mbar). CVD growth of h-BN is performed using a borazine (HBNH)3 precursor at a temperature of ∼900 °C and a total
pressure of 6 × 10–4 mbar. The samples are
typically heated in 4 mbar of NH3 or H2 at 100
°C/min up to 750 °C and then at 50 °C/min up to ∼900
°C. The estimated uncertainty in the temperature measurement
is ±25 °C. Immediately after reaching ∼900 °C
the NH3 or H2 is removed. Borazine is dosed
into the chamber through a leak valve (from a liquid reservoir) and
after growth (growth times varied from 14 s to 8 min) the borazine
leak valve is closed and the heater is turned off. Samples are cooled
in vacuum.
Transfer
For Raman spectroscopy,
optical microscopy, and DF-TEM/STEM, we transfer the h-BN via the
electrochemical bubbling method.[15] We perform
the transfer by spin coating a support layer of poly(methyl methacrylate)
(PMMA) at 5000 rpm for 40 s onto the h-BN. The sample is placed in
a NaOH bath (1M) and during electrolysis H2 bubbles evolve
at the h-BN/Fe interface, lifting the film from the substrate. The
PMMA/h-BN film is rinsed in deionized (DI) water and scooped onto
a SiO2(300 nm)/Si wafer where it is left to dry. The PMMA
is removed by immersing the sample in acetone for ∼12 h, followed
by a rinse in IPA.
Characterization
For the ex situ
characterization of the h-BN on the catalyst, we use scanning electron
microscopy (SEM, Zeiss SigmaVP, 2 kV). Optical images are acquired
using a Nikon eclipse ME600L microscope and a green filter was introduced
for enhanced contrast. Raman spectroscopy is performed with a Renishaw
Raman InVia microscope using a 50× objective lens and a 532 nm
laser excitation. A Philips CM200 was used for bright-field (BF-)
and dark-field transmission electron microscopy (DF-TEM) and selected
area electron diffraction (SAED) at 80 kV. A Nion UltraSTEM 100 was
employed for scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM), using
an electron acceleration voltage of 60 kV and a high angle annular
dark field (HAADF) detector. Atomic-resolution STEM data was processed
to reduce contributions from probe-tails (an unprocessed STEM image
is shown in Figure S4).[39] The intensity profile was extracted from the processed
image data by subtracting the remaining averaged intensity at intensity
minima between atoms from the profile followed by normalizing the
intensity at B sites to 1. As grown h-BN films were transferred from
the catalyst for S(TEM) via the bubbling method onto holey carbon
TEM grids with regular hole arrays.In situ X-ray diffraction
(XRD) was measured at the European Synchrotron Research Facility (beamline
BM20/ROBL) using a X-ray wavelength of 1.078 Å in a previously
described setup.[30,34] Measurements were acquired in
symmetric Theta-2Theta geometry (information depth in μm range)
with the Fe foils clamped on one side by alumina spacers. The intensity
step at ∼16° in all measurements is due to the arrangement
of detector and X-ray entrance/exit slits into the reaction chamber.
We note that reflection positions shift between room temperature and
CVD temperature scans due to thermal expansion. For phase identification
the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) (α-Fe, 53451;
γ-Fe, 44862; Fe2B, 391330; FeB, 391331; ε-Fe3N, 80930; γ′-Fe4N, 79980; h-BN, 167799)
and the International Center for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database
(Fe2B, 361332; FeB, 320463) were used. Rietveld refinement
of data was done using X’Pert Plus software. Quoted in situ
XRD temperatures (∼900 °C) may be underestimated by up
to 25 °C, thus explaining the observed α-Fe → γ-Fe
transition for the H2 pretreatment (Figure a), which would be thermodynamically only
expected for >912 °C for pure Fe.[44]In situ high-pressure XPS measurements during preannealing,
growth, and cooling were performed at the ISISS end station of the
FHI-MPG at the BESSY II synchrotron. We employ a high-pressure setup
that consists of a cell (base pressure ≈ 10–9 mbar) that is attached to a set of differentially pumped electrostatic
lenses and a differentially pumped analyzer (Phoibos 150, SPECS GmbH).
All the spectra are acquired in normal emission geometry, using a
spot size of 80 μm × 150 μm and with a spectral resolution
of ∼0.3 eV. To perform depth-resolution experiments, the photon
energy (Ephoton) is varied in order to
change the kinetic energy of the emitted photoelectrons, thus changing
the inelastic mean free paths, λescape. All spectra
are background-corrected (Shirley) and analyzed using Doniach–Šùnjić
functions convoluted with Gaussian profiles with an accuracy of ∼0.05
eV. All binding energies are referenced to measured Fermi edges.
Authors: Li Song; Lijie Ci; Hao Lu; Pavel B Sorokin; Chuanhong Jin; Jie Ni; Alexander G Kvashnin; Dmitry G Kvashnin; Jun Lou; Boris I Yakobson; Pulickel M Ajayan Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2010-08-11 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Sheneve Z Butler; Shawna M Hollen; Linyou Cao; Yi Cui; Jay A Gupta; Humberto R Gutiérrez; Tony F Heinz; Seung Sae Hong; Jiaxing Huang; Ariel F Ismach; Ezekiel Johnston-Halperin; Masaru Kuno; Vladimir V Plashnitsa; Richard D Robinson; Rodney S Ruoff; Sayeef Salahuddin; Jie Shan; Li Shi; Michael G Spencer; Mauricio Terrones; Wolfgang Windl; Joshua E Goldberger Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2013-03-26 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Andrea Cabrero-Vilatela; Robert S Weatherup; Philipp Braeuninger-Weimer; Sabina Caneva; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Nanoscale Date: 2016-01-28 Impact factor: 7.790
Authors: Vitaliy Babenko; George Lane; Antal A Koos; Adrian T Murdock; Karwei So; Jude Britton; Seyyed Shayan Meysami; Jonathan Moffat; Nicole Grobert Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-10-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Bernhard C Bayer; Sabina Caneva; Timothy J Pennycook; Jani Kotakoski; Clemens Mangler; Stephan Hofmann; Jannik C Meyer Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Michael I Walker; Krystian Ubych; Vivek Saraswat; Edward A Chalklen; Philipp Braeuninger-Weimer; Sabina Caneva; Robert S Weatherup; Stephan Hofmann; Ulrich F Keyser Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Jamie O D Williams; Jack A Alexander-Webber; Jon S Lapington; Mervyn Roy; Ian B Hutchinson; Abhay A Sagade; Marie-Blandine Martin; Philipp Braeuninger-Weimer; Andrea Cabrero-Vilatela; Ruizhi Wang; Andrea De Luca; Florin Udrea; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.576
Authors: Robert S Weatherup; Ashwin J Shahani; Zhu-Jun Wang; Ken Mingard; Andrew J Pollard; Marc-Georg Willinger; Robert Schloegl; Peter W Voorhees; Stephan Hofmann Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2016-09-07 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: Mustafa Caglar; Inese Silkina; Bertram T Brown; Alice L Thorneywork; Oliver J Burton; Vitaliy Babenko; Stephen Matthew Gilbert; Alex Zettl; Stephan Hofmann; Ulrich F Keyser Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2020-01-08 Impact factor: 15.881