Prakash S Masand1, Natasha Tracy1. 1. Global Medical Education, Inc, New York, New York (Dr Masand), and self-employed freelancer, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada (Ms Tracy).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To look at the manner in which patients and caregivers perceive the treatment of bipolar disorder compared with the evidence base for bipolar treatment. METHOD: Between April 2013 and March 2014, 469 respondents took a 14-question online survey on demographics, medications taken, and perspectives on bipolar treatment and medications. Participants were recruited through social media outlets (Facebook and Twitter accounts) of Global Medical Education (New York, New York) and the blog Bipolar Burble, which has a primary audience of people with bipolar disorder. There were no exclusion criteria to participation, and both patients and health care professionals were encouraged to participate. RESULTS: Most respondents were taking ≥ 3 medications, and the greatest unmet need in treatment was for bipolar depression. In general, respondent perspectives on the effectiveness of individual medication treatments did not align with the available literature. Weight gain was the greatest side effect concern for both antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates that there are still many unmet needs in the treatment of bipolar disorder. There is also a mismatch between the evidence base for treatments in bipolar disorder and patient perception of the relative efficacy of different medications. In order to achieve better outcomes, there is a need to provide patients and clinicians greater quality education with regard to the best evidence-based treatments for bipolar disorder.
OBJECTIVE: To look at the manner in which patients and caregivers perceive the treatment of bipolar disorder compared with the evidence base for bipolar treatment. METHOD: Between April 2013 and March 2014, 469 respondents took a 14-question online survey on demographics, medications taken, and perspectives on bipolar treatment and medications. Participants were recruited through social media outlets (Facebook and Twitter accounts) of Global Medical Education (New York, New York) and the blog Bipolar Burble, which has a primary audience of people with bipolar disorder. There were no exclusion criteria to participation, and both patients and health care professionals were encouraged to participate. RESULTS: Most respondents were taking ≥ 3 medications, and the greatest unmet need in treatment was for bipolar depression. In general, respondent perspectives on the effectiveness of individual medication treatments did not align with the available literature. Weight gain was the greatest side effect concern for both antipsychotics and mood stabilizers. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey demonstrates that there are still many unmet needs in the treatment of bipolar disorder. There is also a mismatch between the evidence base for treatments in bipolar disorder and patient perception of the relative efficacy of different medications. In order to achieve better outcomes, there is a need to provide patients and clinicians greater quality education with regard to the best evidence-based treatments for bipolar disorder.
Authors: L G Sylvia; N A Reilly-Harrington; A C Leon; C I Kansky; J R Calabrese; C L Bowden; T A Ketter; E S Friedman; D V Iosifescu; M E Thase; M J Ostacher; M Keyes; D Rabideau; A A Nierenberg Journal: Acta Psychiatr Scand Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 6.392
Authors: Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein; Mitchell D Feldman; Carol E Franz; Rahman Azari; Michael S Wilkes; Ladson Hinton; Peter Franks Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-04-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Anastasiya Nestsiarovich; Nathaniel G Hurwitz; Stuart J Nelson; Annette S Crisanti; Berit Kerner; Matt J Kuntz; Alicia N Smith; Emma Volesky; Quentin L Schroeter; Jason L DeShaw; S Stanley Young; Robert L Obenchain; Ronald L Krall; Kimmie Jordan; Jan Fawcett; Mauricio Tohen; Douglas J Perkins; Christophe G Lambert Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2017-09-13 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Catherine Sanchez; Adrienne Grzenda; Andrea Varias; Alik S Widge; Linda L Carpenter; William M McDonald; Charles B Nemeroff; Ned H Kalin; Glenn Martin; Mauricio Tohen; Maria Filippou-Frye; Drew Ramsey; Eleni Linos; Christina Mangurian; Carolyn I Rodriguez Journal: Compr Psychiatry Date: 2020-08-12 Impact factor: 3.735
Authors: Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Lakshmi Yatham; Heinz Grunze; Pierre Blier; Hans Jurgen Moeller; Siegfried Kasper Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2017-02-01 Impact factor: 5.176