Literature DB >> 17365347

Pharmaceutical websites and the communication of risk information.

Joel J Davis1, Emily Cross, John Crowley.   

Abstract

This study examines the pharmaceutical websites of 44 leading direct-to-consumer (DTC) advertised drugs to determine the extent to which risk information was completely communicated. Three operational definitions of "completeness" were used: communication of the single highest incidence side effect, communication of top three highest incidence side effects, and communication of side effects with incidence of >or= 10% (all measured in terms of absolute percentage). Results indicated that regardless of the measures used, pharmaceutical websites are unlikely to completely communicate risk information. About two thirds of all sites communicated the single highest incidence side effect or all top three side effects. For drugs with side effects at >or= 10% incidence, only about half of their websites fully reported all effects at this level of incidence. Implications for advertisers and regulatory agencies are presented.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17365347     DOI: 10.1080/10810730601091326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Commun        ISSN: 1081-0730


  12 in total

1.  Results from an online survey of patient and caregiver perspectives on unmet needs in the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Prakash S Masand; Natasha Tracy
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-08-28

2.  Direct-to-consumer information in Europe: the blurred margin between promotion and information.

Authors:  Giampaolo Velo; Ugo Moretti
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Consumer confusion between prescription drug precautions and side effects.

Authors:  Jacqueline B Amoozegar; Douglas J Rupert; Helen W Sullivan; Amie C O'Donoghue
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-12-30

4.  Risk Communication and the Pharmaceutical Industry: what is the reality?

Authors:  Brian Edwards; Sweta Chakraborty
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Digital Direct-to-Consumer Advertising: A Perfect Storm of Rapid Evolution and Stagnant Regulation Comment on "Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters".

Authors:  Tim K Mackey
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-02-03

6.  Future Challenges and Opportunities in Online Prescription Drug Promotion Research Comment on "Trouble Spots in Online Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Promotion: A Content Analysis of FDA Warning Letters".

Authors:  Brian G Southwell; Douglas J Rupert
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2016-01-16

7.  Placement and Format of Risk Information on Direct-to-Consumer Prescription Drug Websites.

Authors:  Helen W Sullivan; Amie C O'Donoghue; Douglas J Rupert; Jessica Fitts Willoughby; Kathryn J Aikin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2017-01-27

8.  A decade of controversy: balancing policy with evidence in the regulation of prescription drug advertising.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; David Grande; Derjung M Tarn; Richard L Kravitz
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Can online consumers contribute to drug knowledge? A mixed-methods comparison of consumer-generated and professionally controlled psychotropic medication information on the internet.

Authors:  Shannon Hughes; David Cohen
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Pharmaceutical company perspectives on current safety risk communications in Japan.

Authors:  Hisashi Urushihara; Gen Kobashi; Hideaki Masuda; Setsuko Taneichi; Michiko Yamamoto; Takeo Nakayama; Koji Kawakami; Tsutomu Matsuda; Kaori Ohta; Hiroki Sugimori
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-01-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.