Literature DB >> 25663518

Development and Validation of a Clinical Prediction Rule of the Return-to-Work Status of Injured Employees in Minnesota.

A Bentley Hankins1, Christine A Reid.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Vocational rehabilitation services can be a valuable resource to injured employees at risk for sustaining permanent disability. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a predictive model of return-to-work (RTW) status at workers' compensation claim closure that may assist rehabilitation counselors tasked with determining how to allocate such services.
METHODS: A cross-sectional, retrospective study was conducted using data obtained from 15,372 workers' compensation claims in Minnesota's administrative claims database. The association between a set of 15 predictor variables representing medical and contextual factors and the RTW status as of claim closure of the accessible population was assessed using backward stepwise logistic regression. The most parsimonious set of variables that reliably predicted the outcome was selected as the optimal RTW model. This model was then internally validated via a split-dataset approach.
RESULTS: Risk factors for failure to RTW by claim closure include the following: (1) attorney involvement; (2) higher level of permanent impairment (PI); (3) shorter job tenure; (4) lower pre-injury average weekly wage (AWW); (5) injury affecting the head and neck or the back; and (6) lower level of educational attainment. The optimal RTW model included four main effects (attorney involvement; severity of PI; age; job tenure) and three first-order interaction effects (pre-injury AWW × pre-injury industry; attorney involvement × severity of PI; attorney involvement × job tenure). When applied to the full dataset, the overall classification rate was 74.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: This study's optimal RTW model offers further support for evaluating disability from a biopsychosocial perspective. Given the model's performance, it may be of value to those assessing rehabilitation potential within Minnesota's, and possibly other, workers' compensation system(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25663518     DOI: 10.1007/s10926-015-9568-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  31 in total

1.  Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis.

Authors:  L K Dasinger; N Krause; L J Deegan; R J Brand; L Rudolph
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.162

2.  Biopsychosocial multivariate predictive model of occupational low back disability.

Authors:  Izabela Z Schultz; Joan M Crook; Jonathan Berkowitz; Gregory R Meloche; Ruth Milner; Oonagh A Zuberbier; Wendy Meloche
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Workers' beliefs and expectations affect return to work over 12 months.

Authors:  Martijn W Heymans; Henrica C W de Vet; Dirk L Knol; Paulien M Bongers; Bart W Koes; Willem van Mechelen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

4.  Working with low back pain: workplace and individual psychosocial determinants of limited duty and lost time.

Authors:  M Feuerstein; S M Berkowitz; A J Haufler; M S Lopez; G D Huang
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.214

Review 5.  Integrating psychosocial and behavioral interventions to achieve optimal rehabilitation outcomes.

Authors:  Michael Jl Sullivan; Michael Feuerstein; Robert Gatchel; Steven J Linton; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12

6.  Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Explaining labor force status following spinal cord injury: the contribution of psychological variables.

Authors:  Gregory C Murphy; Amanda E Young; Douglas J Brown; Neville J King
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Low back pain: predictors of absenteeism, residual symptoms, functional impairment, and medical costs in Oregon workers' compensation recipients.

Authors:  P G Butterfield; P S Spencer; N Redmond; A Feldstein; N Perrin
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.214

9.  Employment after spinal cord injury: differences related to geographic region, gender, and race.

Authors:  J S Krause; M Sternberg; J Maides; S Lottes
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 10.  Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns.

Authors:  Amanda E Young; Radoslaw Wasiak; Richard T Roessler; Kathryn M McPherson; J R Anema; Mireille N M van Poppel
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Return-to-Work After Work-Related Injury in the Construction Sector: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Kimberly Sharpe; Tina Afshar; France St-Hilaire; Christopher McLeod
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-18

2.  A Return-to-Work Prognostic Model for Orthopaedic Trauma Patients (WORRK) Updated for Use at 3, 12 and 24 Months.

Authors:  Chantal Plomb-Holmes; François Lüthi; Philippe Vuistiner; Bertrand Leger; Roger Hilfiker
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-12

3.  Relationship Between Age, Tenure, and Disability Duration in Persons With Compensated Work-Related Conditions.

Authors:  Elyssa Besen; Amanda E Young; Brittany Gaines; Glenn Pransky
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Impact of a non-return-to-work prognostic model (WORRK) on allocation to rehabilitation clinical pathways: A single centre parallel group randomised trial.

Authors:  Chantal Plomb-Holmes; Roger Hilfiker; Bertrand Leger; François Luthi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Outcomes of an interdisciplinary work rehabilitation program.

Authors:  Mitchell R Voss; Jennifer K Homa; Maharaj Singh; Jennifer A Seidl; Wesley E Griffitt
Journal:  Work       Date:  2019
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.