Kevin Fischer1, Virginia Hogan2, Alesha Jager3, Daniel von Allmen4. 1. Pediatric Nurse Practitioner in the Division of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in OH. kevin.fischer@cchmc.org. 2. Family Nurse Practitioner in the Division of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in OH. virginia.hogan@cchmc.org. 3. Pediatric Nurse Practitioner in the Division of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in OH. alesha.jager@cchmc.org. 4. Division Director of the Division of Pediatric and Thoracic Surgery at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center in OH. daniel.vonallmen@cchmc.org.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Typical follow-up for surgical procedures consists of an interim history and brief focused physical examination. These appointments occupy clinic resources, require a time investment by the family, and rarely identify problems. Previous studies have demonstrated the safety of a postoperative phone call. OBJECTIVE: Compare a traditional in-person clinic postoperative visit with postoperative phone call follow-up regarding patient satisfaction, rate of successful follow-up, and clinic resource utilization in a large academic practice. DESIGN: A retrospective review of charts of patients who underwent select surgical procedures, along with a review of the clinic schedule for the same time period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy, patient/family satisfaction, and impact on the clinic. METHODS: Families were contacted by telephone two weeks after select surgical procedures to assess for complications and questions. Cohorts of patients six months before and six months after implementation were assessed for main outcome measures. RESULTS: Before implementation, 55.5% of patients (427/769) who had one of the select surgical procedures were seen in the clinic postoperatively, and 62.6% (435/695) had a successful postoperative phone call follow-up. There were also 1090 overall scheduled postoperative appointments. Six months after implementation, overall postoperative appointments decreased 35.5% to 703. Overall, postoperative-scheduled visits decreased by 6% compared with new visits and other general follow-up visits, which each increased by 3%. A satisfaction survey revealed that 93% of patients (n = 231) were highly satisfied with the process. A hospital cost analysis suggested an 89% cost savings ($101.75 per patient for clinic visit vs $12.50 per patient for phone call follow-up). CONCLUSION: Postoperative phone call follow-up is an effective tool that improves patient and physician efficiency and satisfaction.
CONTEXT: Typical follow-up for surgical procedures consists of an interim history and brief focused physical examination. These appointments occupy clinic resources, require a time investment by the family, and rarely identify problems. Previous studies have demonstrated the safety of a postoperative phone call. OBJECTIVE: Compare a traditional in-person clinic postoperative visit with postoperative phone call follow-up regarding patient satisfaction, rate of successful follow-up, and clinic resource utilization in a large academic practice. DESIGN: A retrospective review of charts of patients who underwent select surgical procedures, along with a review of the clinic schedule for the same time period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy, patient/family satisfaction, and impact on the clinic. METHODS: Families were contacted by telephone two weeks after select surgical procedures to assess for complications and questions. Cohorts of patients six months before and six months after implementation were assessed for main outcome measures. RESULTS: Before implementation, 55.5% of patients (427/769) who had one of the select surgical procedures were seen in the clinic postoperatively, and 62.6% (435/695) had a successful postoperative phone call follow-up. There were also 1090 overall scheduled postoperative appointments. Six months after implementation, overall postoperative appointments decreased 35.5% to 703. Overall, postoperative-scheduled visits decreased by 6% compared with new visits and other general follow-up visits, which each increased by 3%. A satisfaction survey revealed that 93% of patients (n = 231) were highly satisfied with the process. A hospital cost analysis suggested an 89% cost savings ($101.75 per patient for clinic visit vs $12.50 per patient for phone call follow-up). CONCLUSION: Postoperative phone call follow-up is an effective tool that improves patient and physician efficiency and satisfaction.
Authors: Barbara P Kassmann; Sharron L Docherty; Henry E Rice; Donald E Bailey; Michelle Schweitzer Journal: J Pediatr Nurs Date: 2012-03-10 Impact factor: 2.145
Authors: M L Kimman; C D Dirksen; A C Voogd; P Falger; B C M Gijsen; M Thuring; A Lenssen; F van der Ent; J Verkeyn; C Haekens; P Hupperets; J K S Nuytinck; Y van Riet; S J Brenninkmeijer; L J E E Scheijmans; A Kessels; Ph Lambin; L J Boersma Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: Marcene R McVay; Karen R Kelley; Donna L Mathews; Richard J Jackson; Evan R Kokoska; Samuel D Smith Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.545
Authors: Caitlin W Hicks; Devin S Zarkowsky; Ian C Bostock; David H Stone; James H Black; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Philip P Goodney; Mahmoud B Malas Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2017-02-16 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Jennifer C Thompson; Sara B Cichowski; Rebecca G Rogers; Fares Qeadan; Julissa Zambrano; Cynthia Wenzl; Peter C Jeppson; Gena C Dunivan; Yuko M Komesu Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: J A Molino; G Guillén; O Rocha; B Oliver; S López Fernández; H A Khan; I de Mir; I Iglesias; M López Journal: J Healthc Qual Res Date: 2022-06-23
Authors: Jinying Chen; Jessica G Wijesundara; Angela Patterson; Sarah L Cutrona; Sandra Aiello; David D McManus; M Diane McKee; Bo Wang; Thomas K Houston Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-09-28 Impact factor: 2.908