Omolara Modupe Williams1, Omolara Morounkeji Faboya2, Olufunmilade Akinfolarin Omisanjo3. 1. Department of Surgery, Lagos State University College of Medicine, and Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria. omra1128@gmail.com. 2. Department of Surgery, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria. 3. Department of Surgery, Lagos State University College of Medicine, and Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Lagos, Nigeria.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Paediatric day case surgeries (DCSs) are associated with minimal complications therefore the post-operative follow-up visit usually serves to calm anxious parents and is replaceable with a phone call. This study examines the safety and reliability of post-operative telephone assessment by caregivers and its acceptability to them. METHODS: Parents of DCS patients over a 9-month period were recruited for telephone follow-up on third post-operative day for wound assessment. The remote reports were compared with the finding during the in-person visit on fourth post-operative day to determine the reliability of parents' observation. The parents' acceptance of telephone follow-up was also studied. RESULTS: The parents of 112 children who had groin surgeries (84%), repair of umbilical hernias (4.5%) and excision of soft tissue masses (11.6%) were recruited. The M:F ratio was 10.2:1. The median age at surgery was 64 months (IQR 43.0-96.8) and median waiting time for surgery was 11.5 months (IQR 3.0-28.8). Most caregivers were mothers (83%) and had a minimum of secondary education (86.6%). The telephone and clinic assessments were matched in 98 of 101 assessed patients. Telephone follow-up would have sufficed for 104 (92.9%) patients and correctly identified those who needed clinic visits. Majority of parents found telephone follow-up acceptable in lieu of clinic visit but some preferred to be given a phone number to initiate the call if necessary. CONCLUSION: Telephone call is safe, feasible and acceptable for follow-up after paediatric DCS. A guided parents' assessment of the wound is reliable for determining those who need hospital visit.
BACKGROUND: Paediatric day case surgeries (DCSs) are associated with minimal complications therefore the post-operative follow-up visit usually serves to calm anxious parents and is replaceable with a phone call. This study examines the safety and reliability of post-operative telephone assessment by caregivers and its acceptability to them. METHODS: Parents of DCSpatients over a 9-month period were recruited for telephone follow-up on third post-operative day for wound assessment. The remote reports were compared with the finding during the in-person visit on fourth post-operative day to determine the reliability of parents' observation. The parents' acceptance of telephone follow-up was also studied. RESULTS: The parents of 112 children who had groin surgeries (84%), repair of umbilical hernias (4.5%) and excision of soft tissue masses (11.6%) were recruited. The M:F ratio was 10.2:1. The median age at surgery was 64 months (IQR 43.0-96.8) and median waiting time for surgery was 11.5 months (IQR 3.0-28.8). Most caregivers were mothers (83%) and had a minimum of secondary education (86.6%). The telephone and clinic assessments were matched in 98 of 101 assessed patients. Telephone follow-up would have sufficed for 104 (92.9%) patients and correctly identified those who needed clinic visits. Majority of parents found telephone follow-up acceptable in lieu of clinic visit but some preferred to be given a phone number to initiate the call if necessary. CONCLUSION: Telephone call is safe, feasible and acceptable for follow-up after paediatric DCS. A guided parents' assessment of the wound is reliable for determining those who need hospital visit.
Authors: Barbara P Kassmann; Sharron L Docherty; Henry E Rice; Donald E Bailey; Michelle Schweitzer Journal: J Pediatr Nurs Date: 2012-03-10 Impact factor: 2.145
Authors: Kristy Kummerow Broman; Michael A Vella; John L Tarpley; Robert S Dittus; Christianne L Roumie Journal: Surgery Date: 2016-04-05 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Marcene R McVay; Karen R Kelley; Donna L Mathews; Richard J Jackson; Evan R Kokoska; Samuel D Smith Journal: J Pediatr Surg Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.545