Sydney Char1, Hyo-Chun Yoon2. 1. Summer Research Assistant in Diagnostic Imaging. She is studying Biomedical Engineering at Tufts University in Medford, MA. sydchar57@gmail.com. 2. Assistant Chief of Diagnostic Imaging at the Moanalua Medical Center in Honolulu, HI. hyo-chun.yoon@kp.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the implementation of an increased D-dimer threshold value and clinical probability assessment increases the prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing pulmonary computed tomography angiography (PCTA) in an Emergency Department setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing PCTA during 2 separate 12-month intervals, 1 before the implementation of an increased D-dimer threshold and recommendation for formal clinical probability assessment and the other after regional implementation. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of acute PE in each of the samples. RESULTS: After the implementation of the increased D-dimer threshold and recommendation for formal clinical probability assessment, the prevalence of PE detected by PCTA increased from 4.7% to 11.7% (p < 0.001). Among all PCTAs performed after the new guidelines were promulgated, 8.6% were still performed on patients who had serum D-dimer values lower than the threshold of 1.0 µg/mL. Despite the recommendation for formal clinical probability assessment before ordering a PCTA, only 4% of patients had a formal clinical probability assessment recorded in their electronic medical record. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an increased D-dimer threshold value increased the prevalence of PE in patients undergoing PCTA in an Emergency Department setting, but more consistent application of clinical probability assessment remains an elusive target.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the implementation of an increased D-dimer threshold value and clinical probability assessment increases the prevalence of pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients undergoing pulmonary computed tomography angiography (PCTA) in an Emergency Department setting. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing PCTA during 2 separate 12-month intervals, 1 before the implementation of an increased D-dimer threshold and recommendation for formal clinical probability assessment and the other after regional implementation. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of acute PE in each of the samples. RESULTS: After the implementation of the increased D-dimer threshold and recommendation for formal clinical probability assessment, the prevalence of PE detected by PCTA increased from 4.7% to 11.7% (p < 0.001). Among all PCTAs performed after the new guidelines were promulgated, 8.6% were still performed on patients who had serum D-dimer values lower than the threshold of 1.0 µg/mL. Despite the recommendation for formal clinical probability assessment before ordering a PCTA, only 4% of patients had a formal clinical probability assessment recorded in their electronic medical record. CONCLUSION: The implementation of an increased D-dimer threshold value increased the prevalence of PE in patients undergoing PCTA in an Emergency Department setting, but more consistent application of clinical probability assessment remains an elusive target.
Authors: Wim Lucassen; Geert-Jan Geersing; Petra M G Erkens; Johannes B Reitsma; Karel G M Moons; Harry Büller; Henk C van Weert Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-10-04 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: F Dentali; W Ageno; C Becattini; L Galli; M Gianni; N Riva; D Imberti; A Squizzato; A Venco; G Agnelli Journal: Thromb Res Date: 2010-05-07 Impact factor: 3.944
Authors: Arne van Belle; Harry R Büller; Menno V Huisman; Peter M Huisman; Karin Kaasjager; Pieter W Kamphuisen; Mark H H Kramer; Marieke J H A Kruip; Johanna M Kwakkel-van Erp; Frank W G Leebeek; Mathilde Nijkeuter; Martin H Prins; Maaike Sohne; Lidwine W Tick Journal: JAMA Date: 2006-01-11 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Christopher Kabrhel; D Mark Courtney; Carlos A Camargo; Christopher L Moore; Peter B Richman; Michael C Plewa; Kristen E Nordenholtz; Howard A Smithline; Daren M Beam; Michael D Brown; Jeffrey A Kline Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2009-03-06 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Daniel Pinto Dos Santos; Sonja Scheibl; Gordon Arnhold; Aline Maehringer-Kunz; Christoph Düber; Peter Mildenberger; Roman Kloeckner Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 3.039