OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to use the results of a quantitative D-dimer assay to determine the need for pulmonary CT angiography in patients suspected of having acute pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2001 to December 2002, 755 patients underwent pulmonary CT angiography for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. A rapid, fully automated quantitative D-dimer assay was obtained in more than half the patients. The electronic medical records of the patients were subsequently reviewed to analyze the negative predictive value of the D-dimer assay in the diagnostic workup of acute pulmonary embolism and to determine the outcome of the patients who had negative findings on both D-dimer assay and pulmonary CT angiography at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 755 patients who underwent pulmonary CT angiography, 666 (88.2%) had negative findings, 73 (9.7%) had positive findings, and 16 (2.1%) were indeterminate. A total of 426 patients underwent both pulmonary CT angiography and D-dimer level evaluation, and 84 of these had negative findings (< 0.4 microg/mL) on D-dimer assay. Eighty-two of the 84 patients with negative findings on D-dimer assay had negative findings on pulmonary CT angiography; two were indeterminate and both subsequently had low-probability ventilation-perfusion studies. Among patients with positive D-dimer assays, no one with a level between 0.4 and 1.0 microg/mL had pulmonary CT angiography with findings positive for pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: A quantitative D-dimer assay was effective in excluding the need for pulmonary CT angiography and had high negative predictive value when the D-dimer level was less than 1.0 microg/mL.
OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to use the results of a quantitative D-dimer assay to determine the need for pulmonary CT angiography in patients suspected of having acute pulmonary embolism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2001 to December 2002, 755 patients underwent pulmonary CT angiography for the evaluation of acute pulmonary embolism. A rapid, fully automated quantitative D-dimer assay was obtained in more than half the patients. The electronic medical records of the patients were subsequently reviewed to analyze the negative predictive value of the D-dimer assay in the diagnostic workup of acute pulmonary embolism and to determine the outcome of the patients who had negative findings on both D-dimer assay and pulmonary CT angiography at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 755 patients who underwent pulmonary CT angiography, 666 (88.2%) had negative findings, 73 (9.7%) had positive findings, and 16 (2.1%) were indeterminate. A total of 426 patients underwent both pulmonary CT angiography and D-dimer level evaluation, and 84 of these had negative findings (< 0.4 microg/mL) on D-dimer assay. Eighty-two of the 84 patients with negative findings on D-dimer assay had negative findings on pulmonary CT angiography; two were indeterminate and both subsequently had low-probability ventilation-perfusion studies. Among patients with positive D-dimer assays, no one with a level between 0.4 and 1.0 microg/mL had pulmonary CT angiography with findings positive for pulmonary embolism. CONCLUSION: A quantitative D-dimer assay was effective in excluding the need for pulmonary CT angiography and had high negative predictive value when the D-dimer level was less than 1.0 microg/mL.
Authors: Shaila Khan; Carmen Guerra; Alexander Khandji; Rebecca M Bauer; Jan Claassen; Hannah Wunsch Journal: J Crit Care Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.425
Authors: Seung Min Yoo; Ji Young Rho; Hwa Yeon Lee; In Sup Song; Jae Youn Moon; Charles S White Journal: Korean Circ J Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 3.243
Authors: Thomas Walter; Paul Apfaltrer; Frank Weilbacher; Mathias Meyer; Stefan O Schoenberg; Christian Fink; Joachim Gruettner Journal: Exp Ther Med Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 2.447