Literature DB >> 25661104

Conservative surgery in ovarian borderline tumours: a meta-analysis with emphasis on recurrence risk.

Inês Vasconcelos1, Miguel de Sousa Mendes2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have stirred the debate regarding the optimal conservative treatment for both serous and mucinous borderline ovarian tumour (BOT). The aim of this study is to examine the optimal oncological approach of conservative surgery in unilateral BOT (cystectomy (C) versus unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO)) and in bilateral BOT (bilateral C (BC) versus USO+contralateral C (CC)), as well as fertility outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed database and Cochrane Library were searched using the search terms (((Borderline) OR (low malignant potential)) AND (ovarian)) AND ((tumour) OR (cancer)) AND (((fertility sparing) OR (conservative)) AND surgery).
RESULTS: We analysed 39 studies that included 5105 women (2624 patients with serous-, 2120 patients with mucinous- and the remaining with other types of BOT), 2752 of which underwent conservative surgery (817 underwent C, 89 BC, 1686 USO and 118 USO+CC). Eight studies included only stage I patients, in 14 studies more than 90% of patients were stage I and five studies included only late-stage patients. Seven studies included only patients with serous borderline ovarian tumour (sBOT) and two only mucinous borderline ovarian tumour (mBOT). A total of 296 patients with non-invasive-, 76 patients with invasive- and 50 patients with unspecified implants were pooled. Of the patients undergoing C, BC, USO and USO+CC the pooled recurrence estimates were respectively 25.3%, 25.6%, 12.5% and 26.1%. In meta-analysis, USO was significantly favored over C with an OR for recurrence reduction=2200, 95% CI=0.793-2.841 and p<0.0001. The pooled recurrence estimate as invasive ovarian cancer was 15.4% and the pooled 95% CI was 0.120-0.196. The cumulative pregnancy rate was 55.7% with 45.4% for USO and 40.3.0% for C.
CONCLUSION: Cystectomy in unilateral serous BOT is significantly associated with a higher recurrence rate, albeit no impact on survival can be demonstrated. Whether this is related to the duration of follow-up, remains to be proven. Nonetheless, recent data seem to suggest that USO is advisable in the case of mucinous BOT. On the contrary, a more conservative approach (BC) should be definitively favored in bilateral BOT, which is almost always serous, because no significant difference is seen in terms of recurrence rate when compared to USO+CC.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Borderline ovarian tumours; Conservative surgery; Fertility-sparing surgery; Low malignant potential ovarian tumours; Pregnancy rates; Recurrence

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25661104     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  28 in total

1.  Ovarian Seromucinous Borderline Tumors Are Histologically Different from Mucinous Borderline Tumors.

Authors:  Taira Hada; Morikazu Miyamoto; Hiroki Ishibashi; Haruka Kawauchi; Hiroaki Soyama; Hiroko Matsuura; Takahiro Sakamoto; Soichiro Kakimoto; Tadashi Aoyama; Hideki Iwahashi; Rie Suzuki; Hitoshi Tsuda; Masashi Takano
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.155

Review 2.  Fertility-sparing for young patients with gynecologic cancer: How MRI can guide patient selection prior to conservative management.

Authors:  Sinead H McEvoy; Stephanie Nougaret; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Christine O Menias; Fuki Shitano; Shinya Fujii; Ramon E Sosa; Joanna G Escalon; Evis Sala; Yulia Lakhman
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-10

3.  Twenty-five-year-old Woman with Bilateral Borderline Ovarian Tumour Desiring to Preserve Fertility - Case Report and Literature Review on the Current State of Fertility Preservation in Women with Borderline Ovarian Tumours.

Authors:  S Findeklee; L Lotz; K Heusinger; I Hoffmann; R Dittrich; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 2.915

Review 4.  Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Tatsuru Ohara; Shiho Kuji; Tomo Takenaga; Haruka Imai; Hiraku Endo; Ryo Kanamori; Jun Takeuchi; Yuko Nagasawa; Noriyuki Yokomichi; Haruhiro Kondo; Imari Deura; Akiko Tozawa; Nao Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 5.  Management, prognosis and reproductive outcomes of borderline ovarian tumor relapse during pregnancy: from diagnosis to potential treatment options.

Authors:  Francesco Cosentino; Luigi Carlo Turco; Stefano Cianci; Francesco Fanfani; Anna Fagotti; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Salvatore Giovanni Vitale; Antonio Simone Laganà; Francesco Padula; Claudio Coco; Salvatore Pisconti; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun

Review 6.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical, Ovarian, and Endometrial Malignancies.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Terri Woodard; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.623

7.  Challenges of Fertility Sparing Ovarian Surgery Imposed by Krukenberg Tumors in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Michael H Bloch; Ramey Z Elsarrag; Mazin Z Elsarrag; Sana M Salih
Journal:  Clin Med Rev Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-08

Review 8.  Controversies in borderline ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Seok Ju Seong; Da Hee Kim; Mi Kyoung Kim; Taejong Song
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 9.  Fertility preservation in women with cervical, endometrial or ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Michael Feichtinger; Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Res Pract       Date:  2016-07-27

10.  Diagnostic workup for endometrioid borderline ovarian tumors (eBOT) requires histopathological evaluation of the uterus.

Authors:  Juliane Reichenbach; Elisa Schmoeckel; Sven Mahner; Fabian Trillsch
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.