Literature DB >> 25658781

Concurrent use of the Pipeline Embolization Device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy.

Erez Nossek1, David J Chalif, Shamik Chakraborty, Kim Lombardo, Karen S Black, Avi Setton.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The use of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) as a sole endovascular modality has been described for the treatment of brain aneurysms. The benefit of using coils concurrently with a limited number of PEDs is not well documented. The authors describe their experience with this technique as well as their midterm clinical and angiographic results.
METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients treated between 2011 and 2014. The authors placed a minimal number of PEDs with the addition of coils using a "jailed" microcatheter technique. A partially dense coil mass was obtained. Immediate and midterm clinical and angiographic results are reviewed.
RESULTS: The authors treated 27 patients harboring 28 aneurysms using this technique. The mean aneurysm size was 11.9 mm, and the mean neck size was 5.4 mm. A mean of 1.48 PEDs were placed per patient, and a mean of 1.33 PEDs per aneurysm were placed. The Raymond score immediately after PED placement was 2 or 3 in 82.1% of the patients. There were no intraprocedural or postprocedural complications. All PEDs were successfully deployed. No clinical or technical adverse effects related to the coil mass were observed. There were no clinical or radiographic signs of ischemia in this group. At follow-up imaging, complete aneurysm occlusion was demonstrated on the first MR angiogram (3-5 months) in all patients who reached this milestone. Follow-up digital subtraction angiography (5-13 months) confirmed complete occlusion in all patients who reached this milestone. All patients maintained their baseline clinical status.
CONCLUSIONS: The deployment of PEDs with concurrent partially dense coiling is safe and efficacious. This technique achieved early complete occlusion and endovascular reconstruction of the parent vessel, without inducing mass effect. Favorable midterm clinical results were observed in all patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICA = internal carotid artery; MRA = MR angiography; PED = Pipeline Embolization Device; PRU = P2Y12 reaction units; Pipeline Embolization Device; aneurysm; brain; coil; mRS = modified Rankin Scale; vascular disorders

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658781     DOI: 10.3171/2014.12.JNS141259

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  17 in total

1.  Spontaneous regression of intracranial aneurysm following remote ruptured aneurysm treatment with pipeline stent assisted coiling.

Authors:  Asterios Tsimpas; William W Ashley; Anand V Germanwala
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-08-13

2.  Aneurysm Remnants after Flow Diversion: Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes.

Authors:  T P Madaelil; J A Grossberg; B M Howard; C M Cawley; J Dion; R G Nogueira; D C Haussen; F C Tong
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Two- to five-year follow-up of 78 patients after treatment with the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device.

Authors:  Hannes Luecking; Arnd Doerfler; Philipp Goelitz; Philip Hoelter; Tobias Engelhorn; Stefan Lang
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 1.610

4.  Treatment of a dissecting vertebral artery aneurysm with angioplasty and the pipeline embolisation device.

Authors:  Veer A Shah; Patrik Leonard; Jordan Sessions; William E Holloway
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-07-21

5.  The Safety and Efficacy of Flow Diversion versus Conventional Endovascular Treatment for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Meta-analysis of Real-world Cohort Studies from the Past 10 Years.

Authors:  S Li; C Zeng; W Tao; Z Huang; L Yan; X Tian; F Chen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 4.966

6.  Silk flow-diverter stent for the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms: A one-year follow-up multicenter study.

Authors:  G Foa Torres; F Roca; A Noguera; J Godes; S Petrocelli; I Aznar; S Ales; P Muszynski; R Maehara; M Vicente; J M Pumar
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 1.610

7.  A novel treatment of a patient with a giant ruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm by acute coiling followed by scheduled Pipeline flex placement.

Authors:  Shikai Liang; Ren Yuan; Xianli Lv
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2020-07-16

8.  Placement of a Stent within a Flow Diverter Improves Aneurysm Occlusion Rates.

Authors:  O Ocal; A Peker; S Balci; A Arat
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Pipeline Embolization Device with or without Adjunctive Coil Embolization: Analysis of Complications from the IntrePED Registry.

Authors:  M S Park; C Kilburg; P Taussky; F C Albuquerque; D F Kallmes; E I Levy; P Jabbour; I Szikora; E Boccardi; R A Hanel; A Bonafé; C G McDougall
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Pipeline flow diversion with adjunctive coil embolization for internal carotid artery aneurysms following an intradural component: results in 46 consecutive aneurysms from a Japanese single-center experience.

Authors:  Tomoaki Akiyama; Hirotoshi Imamura; Masanori Goto; Ryu Fukumitsu; Tadashi Sunohara; Shirabe Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Fukui; Yoshihiro Omura; Tatsumaru Fukuda; Koichi Go; Shinji Kajiura; Masashi Shigeyasu; Kento Asakura; Ryo Horii; Yuji Naramoto; Rikuo Nishii; Yasuhiro Yamamoto; Chiaki Sakai; Nobuyuki Sakai
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.