Literature DB >> 25658325

Characterization of hydraulic fracturing flowback water in Colorado: implications for water treatment.

Yaal Lester1, Imma Ferrer2, E Michael Thurman2, Kurban A Sitterley1, Julie A Korak1, George Aiken3, Karl G Linden4.   

Abstract

A suite of analytical tools was applied to thoroughly analyze the chemical composition of an oil/gas well flowback water from the Denver-Julesburg (DJ) basin in Colorado, and the water quality data was translated to propose effective treatment solutions tailored to specific reuse goals. Analysis included bulk quality parameters, trace organic and inorganic constituents, and organic matter characterization. The flowback sample contained salts (TDS=22,500 mg/L), metals (e.g., iron at 81.4 mg/L) and high concentration of dissolved organic matter (DOC=590 mgC/L). The organic matter comprised fracturing fluid additives such as surfactants (e.g., linear alkyl ethoxylates) and high levels of acetic acid (an additives' degradation product), indicating the anthropogenic impact on this wastewater. Based on the water quality results and preliminary treatability tests, the removal of suspended solids and iron by aeration/precipitation (and/or filtration) followed by disinfection was identified as appropriate for flowback recycling in future fracturing operations. In addition to these treatments, a biological treatment (to remove dissolved organic matter) followed by reverse osmosis desalination was determined to be necessary to attain water quality standards appropriate for other water reuse options (e.g., crop irrigation). The study provides a framework for evaluating site-specific hydraulic fracturing wastewaters, proposing a suite of analytical methods for characterization, and a process for guiding the choice of a tailored treatment approach.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denver–Julesburg basin; Flowback; Fracking; Hydraulic fracturing; Water quality; Water reuse; Water treatment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658325     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  17 in total

1.  Elevated levels of diesel range organic compounds in groundwater near Marcellus gas operations are derived from surface activities.

Authors:  Brian D Drollette; Kathrin Hoelzer; Nathaniel R Warner; Thomas H Darrah; Osman Karatum; Megan P O'Connor; Robert K Nelson; Loretta A Fernandez; Christopher M Reddy; Avner Vengosh; Robert B Jackson; Martin Elsner; Desiree L Plata
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Extensive review of shale gas environmental impacts from scientific literature (2010-2015).

Authors:  Daniele Costa; João Jesus; David Branco; Anthony Danko; António Fiúza
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  In Our Backyard: Perceptions About Fracking, Science, and Health by Community Members.

Authors:  Jane A McElroy; Christopher D Kassotis; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2020-02-06

Review 4.  Organic Pollutants in Shale Gas Flowback and Produced Waters: Identification, Potential Ecological Impact, and Implications for Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  Andrii Butkovskyi; Harry Bruning; Stefan A E Kools; Huub H M Rijnaarts; Annemarie P Van Wezel
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Surface water and groundwater analysis using aryl hydrocarbon and endocrine receptor biological assays and liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry in Susquehanna County, PA.

Authors:  Michelle Bamberger; Marika Nell; Ahmed H Ahmed; Renee Santoro; Anthony R Ingraffea; Rana F Kennedy; Susan C Nagel; Damian E Helbling; Robert E Oswald
Journal:  Environ Sci Process Impacts       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 4.238

6.  Common Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Additives Alter the Structure and Function of Anaerobic Microbial Communities.

Authors:  Adam C Mumford; Denise M Akob; J Grace Klinges; Isabelle M Cozzarelli
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-02       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Nonionic Ethoxylated Surfactants Induce Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 Cells.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Erin M Kollitz; Patrick Lee Ferguson; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Unconventional oil and gas chemicals and wastewater-impacted water samples promote adipogenesis via PPARγ-dependent and independent mechanisms in 3T3-L1 cells.

Authors:  Christopher D Kassotis; Susan C Nagel; Heather M Stapleton
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Shale gas development and infant health: Evidence from Pennsylvania.

Authors:  Elaine L Hill
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 10.  Critical evaluation of human health risks due to hydraulic fracturing in natural gas and petroleum production.

Authors:  Klaus-Michael Wollin; G Damm; H Foth; A Freyberger; T Gebel; A Mangerich; U Gundert-Remy; F Partosch; C Röhl; T Schupp; Jan G Hengstler
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-05-09       Impact factor: 5.153

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.