Literature DB >> 25658291

Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Is Superior if Surgical Decompression and Instrumented Fusion Are Performed within 8 Hours versus 8 to 24 Hours after Injury: A Single Center Experience.

Marko Jug1, Nataša Kejžar2, Miloš Vesel1, Said Al Mawed1, Marko Dobravec1, Simon Herman1, Fajko F Bajrović3,4.   

Abstract

A prospective study was performed to evaluate the impact of surgical decompression (SD) and instrumented fusion within 8 h versus 8-24 h after injury on neurological recovery after cervical traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) in patients operated on in the UMC Ljubljana, Slovenia. Only patients with the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) grades of A through C and with MRI-confirmed spinal cord compression were enrolled. The primary outcome was the change in AIS grade at the 6-month follow-up. Of the 48 enrolled patients, 22 patients who underwent surgery within 8 h (group 8 h) and 20 patients who underwent surgery between 8 and 24 h (Group 8-24 h) after injury concluded the study. At admission, there was no statistically significant difference in AIS grade between the study groups. At the 6-month follow-up, an improvement of at least two AIS grades was found in 45.5% of patients in group 8 h and in 10% of patients in group 8-24 h (p=0.017). The median improvement in the ASIA motor score was 38.5 (10.0-61.0) motor points in group 8 h and 15.0 (8.8-34.0) motor points in group 8-24 h (p=0.0468). In a multivariate analysis, adjusted for the preoperative AIS grade and the degree of spinal canal compromise, the odds of an at least two-grade AIS improvement were at least 106% higher for patients in group 8 h than for patients in group 8-24 h (odds ratio=11.08, p=0.004). No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of perioperative complications, pneumonia, and the number of ventilator-dependent days or the mortality between the groups. Our results suggest that the patients with tSCI who undergo SD within 8 h after injury have superior neurological outcomes than patients who undergo SD 8-24 h after injury, without any increase in the rate of adverse effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SCI; cervical spine; surgical decompression; timing of surgery; trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25658291     DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurotrauma        ISSN: 0897-7151            Impact factor:   5.269


  31 in total

Review 1.  Modern Medical Management of Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Michael Karsy; Gregory Hawryluk
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 2.  C2-C3 spinal fracture subluxation with ligamentous and vascular injury: a case report and review of management.

Authors:  Hepzibha Alexander; Ehsan Dowlati; Jason E McGowan; Robert B Mason; Amjad Anaizi
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2019-01-16

3.  Timing of surgery in traumatic spinal cord injury: a national, multidisciplinary survey.

Authors:  P V Ter Wengel; R E Feller; A Stadhouder; D Verbaan; F C Oner; J C Goslings; W P Vandertop
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Intramedullary Lesion Length on Postoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a Strong Predictor of ASIA Impairment Scale Grade Conversion Following Decompressive Surgery in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Bizhan Aarabi; Charles A Sansur; David M Ibrahimi; J Marc Simard; David S Hersh; Elizabeth Le; Cara Diaz; Jennifer Massetti; Noori Akhtar-Danesh
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Sensitivity and specificity of the 'knee-up test' for estimation of the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale in patients with acute motor incomplete cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Itaru Yugué; Seiji Okada; Takeshi Maeda; Takayoshi Ueta; Keiichiro Shiba
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Surgical Considerations to Improve Recovery in Acute Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Troy Q Tabarestani; Nicholle E Lewis; Margot Kelly-Hedrick; Nina Zhang; Brianna R Cellini; Eric J Marrotte; Theresa Williamson; Haichen Wang; Daniel T Laskowitz; Timothy D Faw; Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

7.  Early vs Late Surgical Decompression for Central Cord Syndrome.

Authors:  Jetan H Badhiwala; Jefferson R Wilson; James S Harrop; Alexander R Vaccaro; Bizhan Aarabi; Fred H Geisler; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 16.681

8.  Neurological recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: what is meaningful? A patients' and physicians' perspective.

Authors:  Paula Valerie Ter Wengel; Marcel W M Post; Enrico Martin; Janneke Stolwijk-Swuste; Allard Jan Frederik Hosman; Said Sadiqi; William Peter Vandertop; Fetullah Cumhur Öner
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 9.  Increased intrathecal pressure after traumatic spinal cord injury: an illustrative case presentation and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Lukas Grassner; Peter A Winkler; Martin Strowitzki; Volker Bühren; Doris Maier; Michael Bierschneider
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Impact of surgery on the outcome after spinal cord injury - current concepts and an outlook into the future.

Authors:  Lukas Grassner; Doris Maier
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.135

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.