Jetan H Badhiwala1, Jefferson R Wilson1,2, James S Harrop3, Alexander R Vaccaro4, Bizhan Aarabi5, Fred H Geisler6, Michael G Fehlings1,7. 1. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore. 6. Department of Medical Imaging, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada. 7. Division of Neurosurgery, Krembil Neuroscience Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Importance: The optimal clinical management of central cord syndrome (CCS) remains unclear; yet this is becoming an increasingly relevant public health problem in the face of an aging population. Objective: To provide a head-to-head comparison of the neurologic and functional outcomes of early (<24 hours) vs late (≥24 hours) surgical decompression for CCS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients who underwent surgery for CCS (lower extremity motor score [LEMS] - upper extremity motor score [UEMS] ≥ 5) were included in this propensity score-matched cohort study. Data were collected from December 1991 to March 2017, and the analysis was performed from March 2020 to January 2021. This study identified patients with CCS from 3 international multicenter studies with data on the timing of surgical decompression in spinal cord injury. Participants were included if they had a documented baseline neurologic examination performed within 14 days of injury. Participants were eligible if they underwent surgical decompression for CCS. Exposures: Early surgery was compared with late surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Propensity scores were calculated as the probability of undergoing early compared with late surgery using the logit method and adjusting for relevant confounders. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio by an optimal-matching technique. The primary end point was motor recovery (UEMS, LEMS, American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] motor score [AMS]) at 1 year. Secondary end points were Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score and complete independence in each FIM motor domain at 1 year. Results: The final study cohort consisted of 186 patients with CCS. The early-surgery group included 93 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.8 [16.8] years; 66 male [71.0%]), and the late-surgery group included 93 patients (mean [SD] age, 48.0 [15.5] years; 75 male [80.6%]). Early surgical decompression resulted in significantly improved recovery in upper limb (mean difference [MD], 2.3; 95% CI, 0-4.5; P = .047), but not lower limb (MD, 1.1; 95% CI, -0.8 to 3.0; P = .30), motor function. In an a priori-planned subgroup analysis, outcomes were comparable with early or late decompressive surgery in patients with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade D injury. However, in patients with AIS grade C injury, early surgery resulted in significantly greater recovery in overall motor score (MD, 9.5; 95% CI, 0.5-18.4; P = .04), owing to gains in both upper and lower limb motor function. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found early surgical decompression to be associated with improved recovery in upper limb motor function at 1 year in patients with CCS. Treatment paradigms for CCS should be redefined to encompass early surgical decompression as a neuroprotective therapy.
Importance: The optimal clinical management of central cord syndrome (CCS) remains unclear; yet this is becoming an increasingly relevant public health problem in the face of an aging population. Objective: To provide a head-to-head comparison of the neurologic and functional outcomes of early (<24 hours) vs late (≥24 hours) surgical decompression for CCS. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients who underwent surgery for CCS (lower extremity motor score [LEMS] - upper extremity motor score [UEMS] ≥ 5) were included in this propensity score-matched cohort study. Data were collected from December 1991 to March 2017, and the analysis was performed from March 2020 to January 2021. This study identified patients with CCS from 3 international multicenter studies with data on the timing of surgical decompression in spinal cord injury. Participants were included if they had a documented baseline neurologic examination performed within 14 days of injury. Participants were eligible if they underwent surgical decompression for CCS. Exposures: Early surgery was compared with late surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Propensity scores were calculated as the probability of undergoing early compared with late surgery using the logit method and adjusting for relevant confounders. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio by an optimal-matching technique. The primary end point was motor recovery (UEMS, LEMS, American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] motor score [AMS]) at 1 year. Secondary end points were Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score and complete independence in each FIM motor domain at 1 year. Results: The final study cohort consisted of 186 patients with CCS. The early-surgery group included 93 patients (mean [SD] age, 47.8 [16.8] years; 66 male [71.0%]), and the late-surgery group included 93 patients (mean [SD] age, 48.0 [15.5] years; 75 male [80.6%]). Early surgical decompression resulted in significantly improved recovery in upper limb (mean difference [MD], 2.3; 95% CI, 0-4.5; P = .047), but not lower limb (MD, 1.1; 95% CI, -0.8 to 3.0; P = .30), motor function. In an a priori-planned subgroup analysis, outcomes were comparable with early or late decompressive surgery in patients with ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade D injury. However, in patients with AIS grade C injury, early surgery resulted in significantly greater recovery in overall motor score (MD, 9.5; 95% CI, 0.5-18.4; P = .04), owing to gains in both upper and lower limb motor function. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found early surgical decompression to be associated with improved recovery in upper limb motor function at 1 year in patients with CCS. Treatment paradigms for CCS should be redefined to encompass early surgical decompression as a neuroprotective therapy.
Authors: Joost J van Middendorp; Allard J F Hosman; A Rogier T Donders; Martin H Pouw; John F Ditunno; Armin Curt; Alexander C H Geurts; Hendrik Van de Meent Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-03-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Nitin B Jain; Gregory D Ayers; Emily N Peterson; Mitchel B Harris; Leslie Morse; Kevin C O'Connor; Eric Garshick Journal: JAMA Date: 2015-06-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Marcel F Dvorak; Charles G Fisher; Joel Hoekema; Michael Boyd; Vanessa Noonan; Peter C Wing; Brian K Kwon; Brian Kwon Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-10-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: James Guest; Mohammed A Eleraky; Paul J Apostolides; Curtis A Dickman; Volker K H Sonntag Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Aladine A Elsamadicy; Mani Ratnesh S Sandhu; Isaac G Freedman; Benjamin C Reeves; Andrew B Koo; Astrid Hengartner; John Havlik; Josiah Sherman; Richard Maduka; Isaac K Agboola; Dirk C Johnson; Luis Kolb; Maxwell Laurans Journal: World Neurosurg Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Linda A T Jones; Anne Bryden; Tracey L Wheeler; Keith E Tansey; Kim D Anderson; Michael S Beattie; Andrew Blight; Armin Curt; Edelle Field-Fote; James D Guest; Jane Hseih; Lyn B Jakeman; Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan; Laura Krisa; Daniel P Lammertse; Benjamin Leiby; Ralph Marino; Jan M Schwab; Giorgio Scivoletto; David S Tulsky; Ed Wirth; José Zariffa; Naomi Kleitman; Mary Jane Mulcahey; John D Steeves Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2017-12-28 Impact factor: 2.772