Literature DB >> 25656545

Differentiating benign from malignant vertebral fractures using T1 -weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Julio Arevalo-Perez1, Kyung K Peck1,2, John K Lyo1, Andrei I Holodny1, Eric Lis1, Sasan Karimi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To differentiate pathologic from benign vertebral fractures, which can be challenging. We hypothesized that dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) can aid in the noninvasive distinction between pathologic and benign fractures.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with vertebral fractures who underwent DCE-MRI, biopsy, and kyphoplasty were reviewed. Forty-seven fractures were separated into pathologic and benign fractures. Benign fractures were in turn separated into acute and chronic fractures for further comparison. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed over fractured vertebral bodies. Perfusion parameters: plasma volume (Vp ), K(trans) , wash-in slope, peak enhancement, and area under the curve (AUC) were measured and compared between the three different groups of fractures. A Mann-Whitney U-test was conducted to assess the difference between the groups.
RESULTS: Pathologic fractures had significantly higher (P < 0.01) perfusion parameters (Vp , K(trans) , wash-in slope, peak enhancement, and AUC) compared with benign fractures. We also found significant differences (P < 0.001) in all parameters between chronic and acute fractures. Vp and K(trans) were able to differentiate between pathologic and acute fractures (P < 0.01). No significant differences were found with peak enhancement (P = 0.21) and AUC (P = 0.4) between pathologic and acute fractures.
CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that T1 -weighted DCE-MRI has potential to differentiate between pathologic vs. benign, acute vs. chronic, and most important, benign acute vs. pathologic vertebral fractures.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benign vs. acute; differentiate; vertebral compression fractures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25656545      PMCID: PMC5525155          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  20 in total

1.  Intertrabecular pattern of tumors metastatic to bone.

Authors:  T Yamaguchi; K Tamai; M Yamato; K Honma; Y Ueda; K Saotome
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Contrast enhancement and quantitative signal analysis in MR imaging of multiple myeloma: assessment of focal and diffuse growth patterns in marrow correlated with biopsies and survival rates.

Authors:  A Stäbler; A Baur; R Bartl; R Munker; R Lamerz; M F Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 3.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of musculoskeletal tumors: basic principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  K L Verstraete; H J Van der Woude; P C Hogendoorn; Y De-Deene; M Kunnen; J L Bloem
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.813

4.  Evaluation of angiogenesis and perfusion of bone marrow lesions: role of semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic MRI.

Authors:  H Hawighorst; M Libicher; M V Knopp; T Moehler; G W Kauffmann; G v Kaick
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Combined diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging of patients with acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Andreas Biffar; Steven Sourbron; Olaf Dietrich; Gerwin Schmidt; Michael Ingrisch; Maximilian F Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Musculoskeletal tumors: does fast dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging contribute to the characterization?

Authors:  H J van der Woude; K L Verstraete; P C Hogendoorn; A H Taminiau; J Hermans; J L Bloem
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Quantitative analysis of acute benign and malignant vertebral body fractures using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Tobias Geith; Andreas Biffar; Gerwin Schmidt; Steven Sourbron; Hans Roland Dürr; Maximilian Reiser; Andrea Baur-Melnyk
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Mechanisms of bone lesions in multiple myeloma and lymphoma.

Authors:  G D Roodman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Radiological detection of bone and bone marrow metastases.

Authors:  H Jacobsson; H Göransson
Journal:  Med Oncol Tumor Pharmacother       Date:  1991

Review 10.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  3 in total

1.  Differentiating Atypical Hemangiomas and Metastatic Vertebral Lesions: The Role of T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

Authors:  K A Morales; J Arevalo-Perez; K K Peck; A I Holodny; E Lis; S Karimi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  T1-weighted Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI to Differentiate Nonneoplastic and Malignant Vertebral Body Lesions in the Spine.

Authors:  Youxin Guan; Kyung K Peck; John Lyo; Jamie Tisnado; Eric Lis; Julio Arevalo-Perez; Yoshiya Yamada; Meera R Hameed; Sasan Karimi; Andrei Holodny
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures using conventional and advanced MRI techniques.

Authors:  Valeria Romeo; Lorenzo Ugga; Arnaldo Stanzione; Sirio Cocozza; Renato Cuocolo; Arturo Brunetti
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-05-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.