Literature DB >> 29650780

Differentiating Atypical Hemangiomas and Metastatic Vertebral Lesions: The Role of T1-Weighted Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI.

K A Morales1,2, J Arevalo-Perez1, K K Peck1,3, A I Holodny1, E Lis1, S Karimi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Vertebral hemangiomas are benign vascular lesions that are almost always incidentally found in the spine. Their classic typical hyperintense appearance on T1- and T2-weighted MR images is diagnostic. Unfortunately, not all hemangiomas have the typical appearance, and they can mimic metastases on routine MR imaging. These are generally referred to as atypical hemangiomas and can result in misdiagnosis and ultimately additional imaging, biopsy, and unnecessary costs. Our objective was to assess the utility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging perfusion in distinguishing vertebral atypical hemangiomas and malignant vertebral metastases. We hypothesized that permeability and vascular density will be increased in metastases compared with atypical hemangiomas.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients from 2011 to 2015 with confirmed diagnoses of atypical hemangiomas and spinal metastases from breast and lung carcinomas with available dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging were analyzed. Time-intensity curves were qualitatively compared among the groups. Perfusion parameters, plasma volume, and permeability constant were quantified using an extended Tofts 2-compartment pharmacokinetic model. Statistical significance was tested using the Mann-Whitney U test.
RESULTS: Qualitative inspection of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging time-intensity curves demonstrated differences in signal intensity and morphology between metastases and atypical hemangiomas. Quantitative analysis of plasma volume and permeability constant perfusion parameters showed significantly higher values in metastatic lesions compared with atypical hemangiomas (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate that plasma volume and permeability constant perfusion parameters and qualitative inspection of contrast-enhancement curves can be used to differentiate atypical hemangiomas from vertebral metastatic lesions. This work highlights the benefits of adding perfusion maps to conventional sequences to improve diagnostic accuracy.
© 2018 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29650780      PMCID: PMC5955841          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5630

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  18 in total

1.  The polka-dot sign.

Authors:  Thara Persaud
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  A systematic approach to vertebral hemangioma.

Authors:  Simona Gaudino; Matia Martucci; Raffaella Colantonio; Emilio Lozupone; Emiliano Visconti; Antonio Leone; Cesare Colosimo
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Multiple primary hemangiomas of bone.

Authors:  C A Karlin; A C Brower
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Magnetic resonance perfusion characteristics of hypervascular renal and hypovascular prostate spinal metastases: clinical utilities and implications.

Authors:  Atin Saha; Kyung K Peck; Eric Lis; Andrei I Holodny; Yoshiya Yamada; Sasan Karimi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of benign spinal lesions simulating metastasis: role of diffusion-weighted imaging.

Authors:  N E Leeds; A J Kumar; X J Zhou; G C McKinnon
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-08

6.  Benign and malignant processes: normal values and differentiation with chemical shift MR imaging in vertebral marrow.

Authors:  Donald C Zajick; William B Morrison; Mark E Schweitzer; Joan Antoni Parellada; John A Carrino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Vertebral hemangioma: an important differential in the evaluation of locally aggressive spinal lesions.

Authors:  Justin Alexander; Adam Meir; Nikitas Vrodos; Yun-Hom Yau
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Vertebral hemangiomas: radiologic evaluation.

Authors:  J D Laredo; D Reizine; M Bard; J J Merland
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 9.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Measurement of blood perfusion in spinal metastases with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: evaluation of tumor response to radiation therapy.

Authors:  Stacy Chu; Sasan Karimi; Kyung K Peck; Yoshiya Yamada; Eric Lis; John Lyo; Mark Bilsky; Andrei I Holodny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The Dixon technique for MRI of the bone marrow.

Authors:  Niels van Vucht; Rodney Santiago; Bianca Lottmann; Ian Pressney; Dorothee Harder; Adnan Sheikh; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-07-15       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Early response assessment after CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for symptomatic vertebral hemangioma by quantitative parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Hongqing Zhuang; Ning Lang; Yongye Chen; Enlong Zhang; Qizheng Wang; Huishu Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Differentiation of Skull Base Chondrosarcomas, Chordomas, and Metastases: Utility of DWI and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging.

Authors:  Y Ota; E Liao; A A Capizzano; A Baba; R Kurokawa; M Kurokawa; A Srinivasan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 4.966

4.  Accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in discriminating atypical vertebral haemangiomas from malignant masses in patients with vertebral lesions: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Parisa Hajalioghli; Mohammad Hossein Daghighi; Jaber Ghaffari; Mohammad Mirza-Aghazadeh-Attari; Jhila Khamanian; Payam Ghaderi; Iman Yazdaninia; Shadi Daghighi; Armin Zarrintan
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2020-07-06

5.  T1-weighted Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI to Differentiate Nonneoplastic and Malignant Vertebral Body Lesions in the Spine.

Authors:  Youxin Guan; Kyung K Peck; John Lyo; Jamie Tisnado; Eric Lis; Julio Arevalo-Perez; Yoshiya Yamada; Meera R Hameed; Sasan Karimi; Andrei Holodny
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Reply.

Authors:  J C Benson; J M Morris
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Spinal collision lesions.

Authors:  G Hegde; C Azzopardi; A M Davies; A Patel; S L James; R Botchu
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-13

8.  Metastatic vertebral lesion mimicking an atypical hemangioma with negative 18F-FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography.

Authors:  Lucas Paul Paladino; Ana C Belzarena; Evita Henderson-Jackson; David M Joyce
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2019-09-20

Review 9.  Imaging for Plasma Cell Dyscrasias: What, When, and How?

Authors:  Amrita Guha; Antariksh Vijan; Ujjwal Agarwal; Jayant Sastri Goda; Abhishek Mahajan; Nitin Shetty; Navin Khattry
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Rapidly Progressive Myelopathy Caused by Aggressive Vertebral Hemangioma.

Authors:  Kevin A Moattari; Rojeh Melikian; Sanjay K Khurana
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2019-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.