Literature DB >> 8839543

Intertrabecular pattern of tumors metastatic to bone.

T Yamaguchi1, K Tamai, M Yamato, K Honma, Y Ueda, K Saotome.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of radiologically invisible metastatic tumors to bone is not known. To clarify this, the authors examined histologic sections, radiographs, bone scans, and magnetic resonance (MR) images of autopsied patients with bone metastases.
METHODS: Complete slices of the vertebral column, including C3-S1, were obtained from 52 cadavers with metastatic tumors to the spine. Macroscopic and histologic features were compared with postmortem roentgenographs (52 patients), bone scans with 99mTc-labelled methylene diphosphonate (17 patients), and MR images (4 patients). Morphologic patterns were classified into intertrabecular, osteoblastic, osteolytic, mixed, small lesion, and compression fracture.
RESULTS: Metastatic lesions were found in 734 of the 1194 vertebral bodies. The lesions were intertrabecular in 255 vertebrae, osteoblastic in 185, osteolytic in 114, mixed in 70, small lesion in 83, and compression fracture in 27. Postmortem radiographs demonstrated lesions in 367 (50%) of the 734 vertebrae, bone scans in 103 (34.7%) of the 297 vertebrae examined, and MR images in all 42 (100%) vertebral bodies imaged. Lesions showing an intertrabecular pattern were detected in only 7.1% of the radiographs and 4.5% of the bone scans.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiographs and bone scans often fail to show metastatic lesions, especially those with an intertrabecular pattern. The intertrabecular pattern is a unique histologic form that is difficult to detect on radiographs and bone scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8839543     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19961001)78:7<1388::AID-CNCR4>3.0.CO;2-H

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  Pitfalls of FDG-PET for the diagnosis of osteoblastic bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Takako Nakai; Chio Okuyama; Takao Kubota; Kei Yamada; Yo Ushijima; Keiko Taniike; Takako Suzuki; Tsunehiko Nishimura
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-20       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Pain due to epidural tumor in cancer patients. Report of two cases and differential diagnosis.

Authors:  A Caraceni; C Martini; E Zecca; F De Conno; R K Portenoy
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1997-10

3.  Differentiating benign from malignant vertebral fractures using T1 -weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Julio Arevalo-Perez; Kyung K Peck; John K Lyo; Andrei I Holodny; Eric Lis; Sasan Karimi
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Utility of dual energy computed tomography in the evaluation of infiltrative skeletal lesions and metastasis: a literature review.

Authors:  Martin Toby Tan; Thomas Bernard Lloyd
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.128

Review 5.  Clinical spectrum and diagnostic pitfalls of multiple abnormal uptakes on bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Fumihiro Tsubaki; Seiji Kurata; Shuji Nagata; Kiminori Fujimoto; Toshi Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Imaging metastatic bone disease from carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  C Messiou; G Cook; N M deSouza
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Salvage therapy for prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nicholas G Zaorsky; Jeremie Calais; Stefano Fanti; Derya Tilki; Tanya Dorff; Daniel E Spratt; Amar U Kishan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Whole-body MRI: detecting bone metastases from prostate cancer.

Authors:  Katsuyuki Nakanishi; Junichiro Tanaka; Yasuhiro Nakaya; Noboru Maeda; Atsuhiko Sakamoto; Akiko Nakayama; Hiroki Satomura; Mio Sakai; Koji Konishi; Yoshiyuki Yamamoto; Akira Nagahara; Kazuo Nishimura; Satoshi Takenaka; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia.

Authors:  Nozomi Oki; Yohei Ikebe; Hirofumi Koike; Reiko Ideguchi; Daisuke Niino; Masataka Uetani
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.374

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.