Literature DB >> 25654037

Bone Forming Potential of An-Organic Bovine Bone Graft: A Cone Beam CT study.

Usman Haider Uzbek1, Shaifulizan Ab Rahman2, Mohammad Khursheed Alam3, Syed Wasif Gillani4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: An-organic bovine bone graft is a xenograft with the potential of bone formation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bone density using cone beam computed tomography scans around functional endosseous implant in the region of both augmented maxillary sinus with the an-organic bovine bone graft and the alveolar bone over which the graft was placed to provide space for the implants.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sterile freeze dried bovine bone graft produced by National Tissue Bank, University Sains, Malaysia was used for stage-1 implant placement with maxillary sinus augmentation in a total of 19 subjects with 19 implants. The age of all subjects ranged between 40-60 years with a mean age 51±4.70. All subjects underwent a follow up CT scan using PlanmecaPromax 3D(®) Cone beam computed tomography scanner at the Radiology department, Hospital University Sains, Malaysia. The collected data was then analysed to evaluate bone density in Hounsfield Units using PlanmecaRomexis" Imaging Software 2.2(®) which is specialized accompanying software of the cone beam computed tomography machine.
RESULTS: There was bone formation seen at the site of the augmented sinus. A significant increase (p<0.005) in bone density was reported at the augmented site compared to the bone density of the existing alveolar bone.
CONCLUSION: An-organic bovine bone graft is an osteoconductive material that can be used for the purpose of maxillary sinus augmentation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alveolar bone; Implants; Maxillary sinus; Xenograft

Year:  2014        PMID: 25654037      PMCID: PMC4316343          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8557.5352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  24 in total

1.  Bone classification: an objective scale of bone density using the computerized tomography scan.

Authors:  M R Norton; C Gamble
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.977

2.  Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone.

Authors:  L-J Fuh; H-L Huang; C-S Chen; K-L Fu; Y-W Shen; M-G Tu; W-C Shen; J-T Hsu
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 3.837

3.  Quantitative evaluation of bone density using the Hounsfield index.

Authors:  Tannaz Shapurian; Petros D Damoulis; Gary M Reiser; Terrence J Griffin; William M Rand
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Navigated implantation after microsurgical bone transfer using intraoperatively acquired cone-beam computed tomography data sets.

Authors:  M Heiland; P Pohlenz; M Blessmann; H Werle; M Fraederich; R Schmelzle; F A S Blake
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation procedures: a histologic long-term report of 20 cases in humans.

Authors:  M Piattelli; G A Favero; A Scarano; G Orsini; A Piattelli
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 6.  The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success.

Authors:  T Albrektsson; G Zarb; P Worthington; A R Eriksson
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Maxillary sinus floor augmentation on humans: Packing simulations and 8 months histomorphometric comparative study of anorganic bone matrix and β-tricalcium phosphate particles as grafting materials.

Authors:  A Martinez; J Franco; E Saiz; F Guitian
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Five-year outcome of bone remodelling around implants in the maxillary sinus: assessment of differences between implants placed in autogenous inlay bone blocks and in ungrafted maxilla.

Authors:  R Martuscelli; P Toti; L Sbordone; F Guidetti; L Ramaglia; C Sbordone
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.789

9.  Preclinical animal model for de novo bone formation in human maxillary sinus.

Authors:  Karl Andreas Schlegel; Stephan Rupprecht; Ljubinko Petrovic; Christian Honert; Safwan Srour; Cornelius von Wilmowsky; Endre Felszegy; Emeka Nkenke; Rainer Lutz
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-09

10.  Effect of a xenograft on early bone formation in extraction sockets: an experimental study in dog.

Authors:  M Araújo; E Linder; J Lindhe
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.977

View more
  3 in total

1.  Maxillary Sinus Augmentation Using a Titanium Mesh: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Khalid Bahaa-Eldin; Basma Mostafa; Sherine Nasry; Ahmed Reda; Mona Shoeib
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-06-12

2.  Radiographic Comparison of Bovine Bone Substitute Alone Versus Bovine Bone Substitute and Simvastatin for Human Maxillary Sinus Augmentation.

Authors:  Siamak Yaghobee; Amir Ali Reza Rasouli Ghahroudi; Afshin Khorsand; Sanaz Mahmoudi; Sahar Chokami Rafiei
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2018-01

Review 3.  Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.

Authors:  Rusin Zhao; Ruijia Yang; Paul R Cooper; Zohaib Khurshid; Amin Shavandi; Jithendra Ratnayake
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.