| Literature DB >> 25653009 |
Jing Liu1,2, Peijie Chen3, Ru Wang4, Yonghong Yuan5, Xueqiang Wang6, Chunying Li7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tai Chi is the Chinese traditional medicine exercise for mind-body health. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of Tai Chi Chuan (TCC) exercise on the proliferative and cytolytic/tumoricidal activities of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) in postsurgical non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25653009 PMCID: PMC4321705 DOI: 10.1186/s12906-015-0517-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med ISSN: 1472-6882 Impact factor: 3.659
Figure 1Study flow CONSORT diagram. Subjects (n = 32) were randomly assigned to 2 groups, the control group (n = 16) and the Tai Chi Chuan (Tai Chi) group (n = 16). The total number of subjects who participated in end-point measurements was 27 (82%), 13 subjects in the control group and 14 subjects in the Tai Chi group. Reasons for not completing the intervention included withdraw (n = 1), missing blood sample (n = 1), and not attend posttest (n = 3).
Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study participants
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
| Age, yrs | 62.64 ± 8.35 | 60.46 ± 7.08 |
| Weight, kg | 65.46 ± 7.69 | 65.63 ± 8.35 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 21.85 ± 1.79 | 22.13 ± 2.06 |
| Female, No. (%) | 6(43%) | 6(46%) |
| Duration of disease, yr | 6.14 ± 5.35 | 5.31 ± 4.16 |
| Years Postsurgery, yr | 5.74 ± 5.63 | 5.2 ± 4.12 |
| Stage I/II/III, No. | 3/5/6 | 4/5/4 |
| Disease category: | ||
| Squamous | 7(50%) | 6(46%) |
| Adeno | 5(36%) | 5(38%) |
| Bronchoalveolar | 2(14%) | 1(8%) |
| Adeno-squamous | 0(0%) | 1(8%) |
Figure 2Changes in mean NK, NKT, and DC cells in the Tai Chi group and the control group. The units of the change values (NK, NKT, DC123 and DC11c) are percentage of cells in CD3+ lymphocytes. The error bars represent SD of change values. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01 compared between TCC group and control group.
Effect of TCC on PBMCs proliferation, cytotoxic activity and immune cells – comparisons between control group at t = 0 and at t = 16 week, and between TCC group at t = 0 and at t = 16 week
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||
| 0.5 × 106 | 0.89 ± 0.26 | 0.99 ± 0.25 | 0.70 ± 0.28 | 0.92 ± 0.24* |
| 1 × 106 | 1.33 ± 0.26 | 1.39 ± 0.18 | 1.21 ± 0.23 | 1.66 ± 0.37‡ |
|
| ||||
| 50:1 E:T ratio | 1.04 ± 0.33 | 0.99 ± 0.25 | 1.04 ± 0.19 | 0.51 ± 0.15‡▲ |
| 25:1 E:T ratio | 0.85 ± 0.39 | 0.76 ± 0.22 | 0.85 ± 0.16 | 0.51 ± 0.13‡▲ |
| 12.5:1 E:T ratio | 0.66 ± 0.20 | 0.63 ± 0.20 | 0.53 ± 0.15 | 0.52 ± 0.20 |
|
| ||||
| NK (%) | 20.49 ± 6.82 | 20.17 ± 7.35 | 22.66 ± 8.23 | 27.94 ± 10.3▲ |
| NKT (%) | 3.89 ± 2.59 | 2.87 ± 1.71 | 3.58 ± 2.97 | 3.83 ± 3.03 |
| DC11c+ DCs (%) | 1.63 ± 0.80 | 1.47 ± 0.61 | 2.37 ± 1 | 3.09 ± 1.57 |
| DC123+ DCs (%) | 0.42 ± 0.22 | 0.63 ± 0.38 | 0.95 ± 0.44 | 1.10 ± 0.58 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Significant differences between t = 0 week and t = 16 week in control group as well as in TCC group are indicated as follows: *p < 0.05; ‡p < 0.001, using paired-samples t-test. Significant differences between TCC group and control group at t = 16 week are indicated as ▲ p < 0.05, using independent samples t-test.