Literature DB >> 25651100

Do the elderly raise different issues when using the Patient Concerns Inventory in routine head and neck cancer follow-up clinics?

S N Rogers1, R A Audisio, D Lowe.   

Abstract

Head and Neck (H&amp;N) cancer treatment can have a major detrimental impact on patient lives, and these issues can go unrecognised and be inadequately addressed. The aim of this paper is to compare the Patient Concerns Inventory (PCI) responses across age groups attending routine H&amp;N cancer follow-up clinics with particular focus on the elderly (75 years or older). The PCI-HN data were obtained from patients attending follow-up clinics between August 2007 and January 2013. The groups for comparison were: <55 (n = 105), 55-64 (n = 170), 65-69 (n = 64), 70-74 (n = 68), and ≥75 (n = 76), the median in this last group of 79.1 years. Regarding quality of life (QoL) on first completing the PCI the elderly reported better anxiety and mood, higher social-emotional subscale scores and better overall QoL. On the PCI, being elderly did not seem to affect the total numbers of items selected, though fewer items were selected from the psychological, emotional and spiritual well-being domain, and in particular the item about fear of recurrence. Dentist and surgeon were the two health professionals most often selected that patients wished to see or be referred on to. It is possible to recognise concerns in routine clinical care, thus allowing the opportunity for intervention and support to improve the outcome for the elderly.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Patient Concerns Inventory; elderly; head and neck cancer; health-related quality of life; patient reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25651100     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  7 in total

1.  Post-traumatic stress in head and neck cancer survivors and their partners.

Authors:  Elisavet Moschopoulou; Iain Hutchison; Kamaldeep Bhui; Ania Korszun
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Incidence and risk factors for morbidity and mortality in elderly head and neck cancer patients undergoing major oncological surgery.

Authors:  Shin Hyuk Yoo; Jong-Lyel Roh; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  What are the underlying reasons behind socioeconomic differences in doctor-patient communication in head and neck oncology review clinics?

Authors:  Sarah Allen; Simon N Rogers; Steven Brown; Rebecca V Harris
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 4.  Health-Related Quality of Life, Psychosocial Distress and Unmet Needs in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Lachlan McDowell; Danny Rischin; Karla Gough; Christina Henson
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  The Patient Concerns Inventory in head and neck oncology: a structured review of its development, validation and clinical implications.

Authors:  Anastasios Kanatas; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.236

6.  Quality-of-Life Assessment after Head and Neck Oncological Surgery for Advanced-Stage Tumours.

Authors:  Paula Luiza Bejenaru; Bogdan Popescu; Alina Lavinia Antoaneta Oancea; Catrinel Beatrice Simion-Antonie; Gloria Simona Berteșteanu; Mihnea Condeescu-Cojocarița; Anca Ionela Cîrstea; Irina Doinița Oașă; Teodora Elena Schipor-Diaconu; Dan Popescu; Raluca Grigore
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.964

7.  Is social inequality related to different patient concerns in routine oral cancer follow-up clinics?

Authors:  Sarah Allen; Derek Lowe; Rebecca V Harris; Steve Brown; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.503

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.