Danielle F Leong1, Laura J Balcer2, Steven L Galetta2, Greg Evans3, Matthew Gimre3, David Watt3. 1. King-Devick Test, LLC, Oakbrook Terrace, IL, USA. Electronic address: leong.danielle@gmail.com. 2. Departments of Neurology, Ophthalmology and Population Health New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA. 3. Wheaton College Sports Medicine, Wheaton, IL, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Sports-related concussion has received increasing attention as a result of neurologic sequelae seen among athletes, highlighting the need for a validated, rapid screening tool. The King-Devick (K-D) test requires vision, eye movements, language function and attention in order to perform and has been proposed as a promising tool for assessment of concussion. We investigated the K-D test as a sideline screening tool in a collegiate cohort to determine the effect of concussion. METHODS: Athletes (n=127, mean age 19.6±1.2 years) from the Wheaton College football and men's and women's basketball teams underwent baseline K-D testing at pre-season physicals for the 2012-2013 season. K-D testing was administered immediately on the sidelines for football players with suspected head injury during regular games and changes compared to baseline were determined. Post-season testing was also performed to compare non-concussed athletes' test performance. RESULTS: Concussed athletes (n=11) displayed sideline K-D scores that were significantly higher (worse) than baseline (36.5±5.6s vs. 31.3±4.5s, p<0.005, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Post-season testing demonstrated improvement of scores and was consistent with known learning effects (35.1±5.2s vs. 34.4±5.0s, p<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Test-retest reliability was analyzed between baseline and post-season administrations of the K-D test resulting in high levels of test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.95 [95% Confidence Interval 0.85-1.05]). CONCLUSIONS: The data show worsening of K-D test scores following concussion further supporting utility of the K-D test as an objective, reliable and effective sideline visual screening tool to help identify athletes with concussion.
PURPOSE: Sports-related concussion has received increasing attention as a result of neurologic sequelae seen among athletes, highlighting the need for a validated, rapid screening tool. The King-Devick (K-D) test requires vision, eye movements, language function and attention in order to perform and has been proposed as a promising tool for assessment of concussion. We investigated the K-D test as a sideline screening tool in a collegiate cohort to determine the effect of concussion. METHODS: Athletes (n=127, mean age 19.6±1.2 years) from the Wheaton College football and men's and women's basketball teams underwent baseline K-D testing at pre-season physicals for the 2012-2013 season. K-D testing was administered immediately on the sidelines for football players with suspected head injury during regular games and changes compared to baseline were determined. Post-season testing was also performed to compare non-concussed athletes' test performance. RESULTS: Concussed athletes (n=11) displayed sideline K-D scores that were significantly higher (worse) than baseline (36.5±5.6s vs. 31.3±4.5s, p<0.005, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Post-season testing demonstrated improvement of scores and was consistent with known learning effects (35.1±5.2s vs. 34.4±5.0s, p<0.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Test-retest reliability was analyzed between baseline and post-season administrations of the K-D test resulting in high levels of test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.95 [95% Confidence Interval 0.85-1.05]). CONCLUSIONS: The data show worsening of K-D test scores following concussion further supporting utility of the K-D test as an objective, reliable and effective sideline visual screening tool to help identify athletes with concussion.
Authors: Mark S Dziemianowicz; Matthew P Kirschen; Bryan A Pukenas; Eric Laudano; Laura J Balcer; Steven L Galetta Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 5.081
Authors: B L Plassman; R J Havlik; D C Steffens; M J Helms; T N Newman; D Drosdick; C Phillips; B A Gau; K A Welsh-Bohmer; J R Burke; J M Guralnik; J C Breitner Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-10-24 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mohammad N Haider; Phillip R Worts; Kaitlin B Viera; Brendan Villarrubia; Charles G Wilber; Barry S Willer; John J Leddy Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2020-04-22 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Katherine M Breedlove; Justus D Ortega; Thomas W Kaminski; Kimberly G Harmon; Julianne D Schmidt; Anthony P Kontos; James R Clugston; Sara P D Chrisman; Michael A McCrea; Thomas W McAllister; Steven P Broglio; Thomas A Buckley Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-10-16 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Justine B Lawrence; Mohammad N Haider; John J Leddy; Andrea Hinds; Jeffery C Miecznikowski; Barry S Willer Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2018-12-22 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Katherine K Weise; Mark W Swanson; Kimberly Penix; Matthew Heath Hale; Drew Ferguson Journal: Optom Vis Sci Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 1.973
Authors: Kristin M Galetta; Kimberly R Chapman; Maritza D Essis; Michael L Alosco; Danielle Gillard; Eric Steinberg; Diane Dixon; Brett Martin; Christine E Chaisson; Neil W Kowall; Yorghos Tripodis; Laura J Balcer; Robert A Stern Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2017 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: James R Clugston; Zachary M Houck; Breton M Asken; Jonathan K Boone; Anthony P Kontos; Thomas A Buckley; Julianne D Schmidt; Sara P D Chrisman; Nicole L Hoffman; Kimberly G Harmon; Thomas W Kaminski; Michael W Collins; Thomas W McAllister; Michael A McCrea; Steven P Broglio; Justus D Ortega Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2019-10-04 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Priya S Dhawan; Danielle Leong; Lisa Tapsell; Amaal J Starling; Steven L Galetta; Laura J Balcer; Trenton L Overall; Jennifer S Adler; Rashmi B Halker-Singh; Bert B Vargas; David Dodick Journal: Neurol Clin Pract Date: 2017-12