Literature DB >> 29693200

Preliminary experience with SpineEOS, a new software for 3D planning in AIS surgery.

Emmanuelle Ferrero1, Keyvan Mazda2, Anne-Laure Simon2, Brice Ilharreborde2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Preoperative planning of scoliosis surgery is essential in the effective treatment of spine pathology. Thus, precontoured rods have been recently developed to avoid iatrogenic sagittal misalignment and rod breakage. Some specific issues exist in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), such as a less distal lower instrumented level, a great variability in the location of inflection point (transition from lumbar lordosis to thoracic kyphosis), and sagittal correction is limited by both bone-implant interface. Since 2007, stereoradiographic imaging system is used and allows for 3D reconstructions. Therefore, a software was developed to perform preoperative 3D surgical planning and to provide rod's shape and length. The goal of this preliminary study was to assess the feasibility, reliability, and the clinical relevance of this new software.
METHODS: Retrospective study on 47 AIS patients operated with the same surgical technique: posteromedial translation through posterior approach with lumbar screws and thoracic sublaminar bands. Pre- and postoperatively, 3D reconstructions were performed on stereoradiographic images (EOS system, Paris, France) and compared. Then, the software was used to plan the surgical correction and determine rod's shape and length. Simulated spine and rods were compared to postoperative real 3D reconstructions. 3D reconstructions and planning were performed by an independent observer.
RESULTS: 3D simulations were performed on the 47 patients. No difference was found between the simulated model and the postoperative 3D reconstructions in terms of sagittal parameters. Postoperatively, 21% of LL were not within reference values. Postoperative SVA was 20 mm anterior in 2/3 of the cases. Postoperative rods were significantly longer than precontoured rods planned with the software (mean 10 mm). Inflection points were different on the rods used and the planned rods (2.3 levels on average).
CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, the software based on 3D stereoradiography low-dose system used to plan AIS surgery seems reliable for preoperative planning and precontoured rods. It is an interesting tool to improve surgeons' practice, since 3D planning is expected to reduce complications such as iatrogenic malalignment and to help for a better understanding of the complications, choosing the location of the transitional vertebra. However, further work is needed to improve thoracic kyphosis planning. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D; Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Preoperative planning; Sagittal alignment; Stereoradiography

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29693200     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-018-5591-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  43 in total

1.  Coronal and sagittal plane correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison between all pedicle screw versus hybrid thoracic hook lumbar screw constructs.

Authors:  Jason E Lowenstein; Hiroko Matsumoto; Michael G Vitale; Mark Weidenbaum; Jaime A Gomez; Francis Young-In Lee; Joshua E Hyman; David P Roye
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Ashish Patel; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Comparison of single- and dual-rod techniques for posterior spinal instrumentation in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H W Albers; M T Hresko; J Carlson; J E Hall
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Pedicle screw instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Authors:  Se-Il Suk; Jin-Hyok Kim; Sung-Soo Kim; Dong-Ju Lim
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery.

Authors:  Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Benjamin Ungar; Jean-Pierre Farcy; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Prospective multicenter assessment of risk factors for rod fracture following surgery for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Ellen Shaffrey; Eric Klineberg; Christopher I Shaffrey; Virginie Lafage; Frank J Schwab; Themistocles Protopsaltis; Justin K Scheer; Gregory M Mundis; Kai-Ming G Fu; Munish C Gupta; Richard Hostin; Vedat Deviren; Khaled Kebaish; Robert Hart; Douglas C Burton; Breton Line; Shay Bess; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2014-10-17

7.  Assessment of symptomatic rod fracture after posterior instrumented fusion for adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Christopher P Ames; Jason Demakakos; Kai-Ming G Fu; Sassan Keshavarzi; Carol M Y Li; Vedat Deviren; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Shay Bess
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.654

8.  Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Virginie Lafage; Frank Schwab; Ashish Patel; Nicola Hawkinson; Jean-Pierre Farcy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Mechanical consequences of rod contouring and residual scoliosis in sublaminar segmental instrumentation.

Authors:  C E Johnston; R B Ashman; M C Sherman; C F Eberle; W A Herndon; J A Sullivan; A G King; S W Burke
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Influence of implant rod curvature on sagittal correction of scoliosis deformity.

Authors:  Remel Alingalan Salmingo; Shigeru Tadano; Yuichiro Abe; Manabu Ito
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  1 in total

1.  New sagittal classification of AIS: validation by 3D characterization.

Authors:  Mareille Post; Stephane Verdun; Pierre Roussouly; Kariman Abelin-Genevois
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.