| Literature DB >> 25644849 |
Rolf Altenburger1, Selim Ait-Aissa2, Philipp Antczak3, Thomas Backhaus4, Damià Barceló5, Thomas-Benjamin Seiler6, Francois Brion2, Wibke Busch7, Kevin Chipman8, Miren López de Alda5, Gisela de Aragão Umbuzeiro9, Beate I Escher10, Francesco Falciani3, Michael Faust11, Andreas Focks12, Klara Hilscherova13, Juliane Hollender14, Henner Hollert6, Felix Jäger15, Annika Jahnke7, Andreas Kortenkamp16, Martin Krauss7, Gregory F Lemkine17, John Munthe18, Steffen Neumann19, Emma L Schymanski14, Mark Scrimshaw16, Helmut Segner20, Jaroslav Slobodnik21, Foppe Smedes13, Subramaniam Kughathas16, Ivana Teodorovic22, Andrew J Tindall17, Knut Erik Tollefsen23, Karl-Heinz Walz24, Tim D Williams8, Paul J Van den Brink12, Jos van Gils25, Branislav Vrana13, Xiaowei Zhang26, Werner Brack7.
Abstract
Environmental quality monitoring of water resources is challenged with providing the basis for safeguarding the environment against adverse biological effects of anthropogenic chemical contamination from diffuse and point sources. While current regulatory efforts focus on monitoring and assessing a few legacy chemicals, many more anthropogenic chemicals can be detected simultaneously in our aquatic resources. However, exposure to chemical mixtures does not necessarily translate into adverse biological effects nor clearly shows whether mitigation measures are needed. Thus, the question which mixtures are present and which have associated combined effects becomes central for defining adequate monitoring and assessment strategies. Here we describe the vision of the international, EU-funded project SOLUTIONS, where three routes are explored to link the occurrence of chemical mixtures at specific sites to the assessment of adverse biological combination effects. First of all, multi-residue target and non-target screening techniques covering a broader range of anticipated chemicals co-occurring in the environment are being developed. By improving sensitivity and detection limits for known bioactive compounds of concern, new analytical chemistry data for multiple components can be obtained and used to characterise priority mixtures. This information on chemical occurrence will be used to predict mixture toxicity and to derive combined effect estimates suitable for advancing environmental quality standards. Secondly, bioanalytical tools will be explored to provide aggregate bioactivity measures integrating all components that produce common (adverse) outcomes even for mixtures of varying compositions. The ambition is to provide comprehensive arrays of effect-based tools and trait-based field observations that link multiple chemical exposures to various environmental protection goals more directly and to provide improved in situ observations for impact assessment of mixtures. Thirdly, effect-directed analysis (EDA) will be applied to identify major drivers of mixture toxicity. Refinements of EDA include the use of statistical approaches with monitoring information for guidance of experimental EDA studies. These three approaches will be explored using case studies at the Danube and Rhine river basins as well as rivers of the Iberian Peninsula. The synthesis of findings will be organised to provide guidance for future solution-oriented environmental monitoring and explore more systematic ways to assess mixture exposures and combination effects in future water quality monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: Chemical status; Ecological status; Effect-based tools; Mixture toxicity; Priority chemicals; WFD; Water quality
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25644849 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963