Literature DB >> 25644849

Future water quality monitoring--adapting tools to deal with mixtures of pollutants in water resource management.

Rolf Altenburger1, Selim Ait-Aissa2, Philipp Antczak3, Thomas Backhaus4, Damià Barceló5, Thomas-Benjamin Seiler6, Francois Brion2, Wibke Busch7, Kevin Chipman8, Miren López de Alda5, Gisela de Aragão Umbuzeiro9, Beate I Escher10, Francesco Falciani3, Michael Faust11, Andreas Focks12, Klara Hilscherova13, Juliane Hollender14, Henner Hollert6, Felix Jäger15, Annika Jahnke7, Andreas Kortenkamp16, Martin Krauss7, Gregory F Lemkine17, John Munthe18, Steffen Neumann19, Emma L Schymanski14, Mark Scrimshaw16, Helmut Segner20, Jaroslav Slobodnik21, Foppe Smedes13, Subramaniam Kughathas16, Ivana Teodorovic22, Andrew J Tindall17, Knut Erik Tollefsen23, Karl-Heinz Walz24, Tim D Williams8, Paul J Van den Brink12, Jos van Gils25, Branislav Vrana13, Xiaowei Zhang26, Werner Brack7.   

Abstract

Environmental quality monitoring of water resources is challenged with providing the basis for safeguarding the environment against adverse biological effects of anthropogenic chemical contamination from diffuse and point sources. While current regulatory efforts focus on monitoring and assessing a few legacy chemicals, many more anthropogenic chemicals can be detected simultaneously in our aquatic resources. However, exposure to chemical mixtures does not necessarily translate into adverse biological effects nor clearly shows whether mitigation measures are needed. Thus, the question which mixtures are present and which have associated combined effects becomes central for defining adequate monitoring and assessment strategies. Here we describe the vision of the international, EU-funded project SOLUTIONS, where three routes are explored to link the occurrence of chemical mixtures at specific sites to the assessment of adverse biological combination effects. First of all, multi-residue target and non-target screening techniques covering a broader range of anticipated chemicals co-occurring in the environment are being developed. By improving sensitivity and detection limits for known bioactive compounds of concern, new analytical chemistry data for multiple components can be obtained and used to characterise priority mixtures. This information on chemical occurrence will be used to predict mixture toxicity and to derive combined effect estimates suitable for advancing environmental quality standards. Secondly, bioanalytical tools will be explored to provide aggregate bioactivity measures integrating all components that produce common (adverse) outcomes even for mixtures of varying compositions. The ambition is to provide comprehensive arrays of effect-based tools and trait-based field observations that link multiple chemical exposures to various environmental protection goals more directly and to provide improved in situ observations for impact assessment of mixtures. Thirdly, effect-directed analysis (EDA) will be applied to identify major drivers of mixture toxicity. Refinements of EDA include the use of statistical approaches with monitoring information for guidance of experimental EDA studies. These three approaches will be explored using case studies at the Danube and Rhine river basins as well as rivers of the Iberian Peninsula. The synthesis of findings will be organised to provide guidance for future solution-oriented environmental monitoring and explore more systematic ways to assess mixture exposures and combination effects in future water quality monitoring.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical status; Ecological status; Effect-based tools; Mixture toxicity; Priority chemicals; WFD; Water quality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25644849     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  29 in total

1.  Expanded Target-Chemical Analysis Reveals Extensive Mixed-Organic-Contaminant Exposure in U.S. Streams.

Authors:  Paul M Bradley; Celeste A Journey; Kristin M Romanok; Larry B Barber; Herbert T Buxton; William T Foreman; Edward T Furlong; Susan T Glassmeyer; Michelle L Hladik; Luke R Iwanowicz; Daniel K Jones; Dana W Kolpin; Kathryn M Kuivila; Keith A Loftin; Marc A Mills; Michael T Meyer; James L Orlando; Timothy J Reilly; Kelly L Smalling; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 2.  From the exposome to mechanistic understanding of chemical-induced adverse effects.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Jörg Hackermüller; Tobias Polte; Stefan Scholz; Achim Aigner; Rolf Altenburger; Alexander Böhme; Stephanie K Bopp; Werner Brack; Wibke Busch; Marc Chadeau-Hyam; Adrian Covaci; Adolf Eisenträger; James J Galligan; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Thomas Hartung; Michaela Hein; Gunda Herberth; Annika Jahnke; Jos Kleinjans; Nils Klüver; Martin Krauss; Marja Lamoree; Irina Lehmann; Till Luckenbach; Gary W Miller; Andrea Müller; David H Phillips; Thorsten Reemtsma; Ulrike Rolle-Kampczyk; Gerrit Schüürmann; Benno Schwikowski; Yu-Mei Tan; Saskia Trump; Susanne Walter-Rohde; John F Wambaugh
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 9.621

3.  Assessing watercourse quality: challenges in implementing European and Swiss legal frameworks.

Authors:  Marianne Milano; Nathalie Chèvre; Emmanuel Reynard
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Opportunities and Limitations for Untargeted Mass Spectrometry Metabolomics to Identify Biologically Active Constituents in Complex Natural Product Mixtures.

Authors:  Lindsay K Caesar; Joshua J Kellogg; Olav M Kvalheim; Nadja B Cech
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.050

5.  A Reduced Transcriptome Approach to Assess Environmental Toxicants Using Zebrafish Embryo Test.

Authors:  Pingping Wang; Pu Xia; Jianghua Yang; Zhihao Wang; Ying Peng; Wei Shi; Daniel L Villeneuve; Hongxia Yu; Xiaowei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Towards the review of the European Union Water Framework Directive: Recommendations for more efficient assessment and management of chemical contamination in European surface water resources.

Authors:  Werner Brack; Valeria Dulio; Marlene Ågerstrand; Ian Allan; Rolf Altenburger; Markus Brinkmann; Dirk Bunke; Robert M Burgess; Ian Cousins; Beate I Escher; Félix J Hernández; L Mark Hewitt; Klára Hilscherová; Juliane Hollender; Henner Hollert; Robert Kase; Bernd Klauer; Claudia Lindim; David López Herráez; Cécil Miège; John Munthe; Simon O'Toole; Leo Posthuma; Heinz Rüdel; Ralf B Schäfer; Manfred Sengl; Foppe Smedes; Dik van de Meent; Paul J van den Brink; Jos van Gils; Annemarie P van Wezel; A Dick Vethaak; Etienne Vermeirssen; Peter C von der Ohe; Branislav Vrana
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Potential Toxicity of Complex Mixtures in Surface Waters from a Nationwide Survey of United States Streams: Identifying in Vitro Bioactivities and Causative Chemicals.

Authors:  Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley; Paul M Bradley; Keith A Houck; Sergei S Makarov; Alexander V Medvedev; Joe Swintek; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Prior knowledge-based approach for associating contaminants with biological effects: A case study in the St. Croix River basin, MN, WI, USA.

Authors:  Anthony L Schroeder; Dalma Martinović-Weigelt; Gerald T Ankley; Kathy E Lee; Natalia Garcia-Reyero; Edward J Perkins; Heiko L Schoenfuss; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Pollut       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 8.071

9.  Evaluation of consistency for multiple experiments of a single combination in the time-dependence mixture toxicity assay.

Authors:  D A Dawson; G Pöch
Journal:  Toxicol Mech Methods       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.987

10.  Evaluation of an extraction method for a mixture of endocrine disrupters in sediment using chemical and in vitro biological analyses.

Authors:  Nicolas Creusot; Marie-Hélène Dévier; Hélène Budzinski; Selim Aït-Aïssa
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 4.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.