Literature DB >> 26832862

Evaluation of an extraction method for a mixture of endocrine disrupters in sediment using chemical and in vitro biological analyses.

Nicolas Creusot1,2,3, Marie-Hélène Dévier4,5, Hélène Budzinski4,5, Selim Aït-Aïssa6.   

Abstract

Aquatic sediments are contaminated by a wide diversity of organic pollutants such as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) which encompass a broad range of chemical classes having natural and anthropogenic origins. The use of in vitro bioassays is now widely accepted as an alternative method for their detection in complex samples. However, based on the diversity of EDC chemical properties, their common extraction is difficult and comprehensive validation of extraction methods for a bioanalysis purpose is still weakly documented. In this study, we compared the performance of several organic solvents, i.e., acetone, methanol, dichloromethane, heptane, dichloromethane/acetone (50:50, v/v), dichloromethane/methanol (50:50, v/v), heptane/acetone (50:50, v/v), and heptane/methanol (50:50, v/v), to extract a diversity of active chemicals from a spiked sediment matrix using pressurized liquid extraction. For this purpose, we defined a mixture of 12 EDCs with a wide range of polarity (2 < log Kow < 8) (i.e., estrone, 17β-estradiol, bisphenol A, o,p'DDT, 4-tert-octylphenol, fenofibrate, triphenyl phosphate, clotrimazole, PCB-126, 2,3,7,8 TCDD, benzo[k]fluoranthene, and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene). Working concentrations of each individual compound in the mixture were determined as equipotent concentrations on the basis of the concentration-addition (CA) model applied to in vitro estrogenic, dioxin-like, and pregnane X receptor (PXR)-like activities. Extraction efficiencies based on both chemical and biological analyses were assessed in triplicate in artificial blank sediment spiked with this mixture and in natural sediment contaminated by native EDCs. In both spiked and natural sediment, MeOH/DCM yields the best recovery while heptane was the least efficient solvent. Our study provided the validation of a sediment extraction methodology for EDC bioanalysis purposes, which can be used for comprehensive environmental contamination characterization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDC; In vitro bioanalytical tools; Mixture effect; Pressurized liquid extraction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26832862     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-016-6062-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  38 in total

1.  Biological and chemical determination of dioxin-like compounds in sediments by means of a sediment triad approach in the catchment area of the river Neckar.

Authors:  Ner Hollert; Matthias Dürr; Helena Olsman; Krister Halldin; E van Bavel; Werner Brack; Mats Tysklind; Magnus Engwall; Thomas Braunbeck
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Determination of 10 particle-associated multiclass polar and semi-polar pesticides from small streams using accelerated solvent extraction.

Authors:  Ralf Bernhard Schäfer; Ralf Mueller; Werner Brack; Klaus-Dieter Wenzel; Georg Streck; Wolfgang Ruck; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 3.  The risk of altering soil and sediment samples upon extract preparation for analytical and bio-analytical investigations--a review.

Authors:  Thomas-Benjamin Seiler; Tobias Schulze; Henner Hollert
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Development of a sample preparation method for the analysis of current-use pesticides in sediment using gas chromatography.

Authors:  Dongli Wang; Donald P Weston; Yuping Ding; Michael J Lydy
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Validation of a GC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of 86 persistent organic pollutants in marine sediments by pressurized liquid extraction followed by stir bar sorptive extraction.

Authors:  F J Camino-Sánchez; Alberto Zafra-Gómez; J P Pérez-Trujillo; J E Conde-González; J C Marques; José Luis Vílchez
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 7.086

6.  Determination of commonly used azole antifungals in various waters and sewage sludge using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Qiuxin Huang; Yiyi Yu; Caiming Tang; Xianzhi Peng
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.759

7.  Evaluation of an hPXR reporter gene assay for the detection of aquatic emerging pollutants: screening of chemicals and application to water samples.

Authors:  Nicolas Creusot; Saïd Kinani; Patrick Balaguer; Nathalie Tapie; Karyn LeMenach; Emmanuelle Maillot-Maréchal; Jean-Marc Porcher; Hélène Budzinski; Sélim Aït-Aïssa
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2009-11-29       Impact factor: 4.142

8.  Evaluation of Soxhlet extraction, accelerated solvent extraction and microwave-assisted extraction for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in soil and fish samples.

Authors:  Pu Wang; Qinghua Zhang; Yawei Wang; Thanh Wang; Xiaomin Li; Lei Ding; Guibin Jiang
Journal:  Anal Chim Acta       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 6.558

9.  Determination of endocrine-disrupting compounds in environmental samples using gas and liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Roger Jeannot; Hassan Sabik; Emmanuel Sauvard; Thierry Dagnac; Katja Dohrendorf
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2002-10-18       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Toxicological profiling of sediments using in vitro bioassays, with emphasis on endocrine disruption.

Authors:  Corine J Houtman; Peter H Cenijn; Timo Hamers; Marja H Lamoree; Juliette Legler; Albertinka J Murk; Abraham Brouwer
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.