UNLABELLED: The current system granting liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) additional Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) points is controversial due to geographic disparity and uncertainty regarding optimal prioritization of candidates. The current national policy assigns a MELD exception score of 22 immediately upon listing of eligible patients with HCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effects of delays in granting these exception points on transplant rates for HCC and non-HCC patients. We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data and liver simulated allocation modeling software and modeled (1) a 3-month delay before granting a MELD exception score of 25, (2) a 6-month delay before granting a score of 28, and (3) a 9-month delay before granting a score of 29. Of all candidates waitlisted between January 1 and December 31, 2010 (n = 28,053), 2773 (9.9%) had an HCC MELD exception. For HCC candidates, transplant rates would be 108.7, 65.0, 44.2, and 33.6 per 100 person-years for the current policy and for 3-, 6-, and 9-month delays, respectively. Corresponding rates would be 30.1, 32.5, 33.9, and 34.8 for non-HCC candidates. CONCLUSION: A delay of 6-9 months would eliminate the geographic variability in the discrepancy between HCC and non-HCC transplant rates under current policy and may allow for more equal access to transplant for all candidates.
UNLABELLED: The current system granting liver transplant candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) additional Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) points is controversial due to geographic disparity and uncertainty regarding optimal prioritization of candidates. The current national policy assigns a MELD exception score of 22 immediately upon listing of eligible patients with HCC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effects of delays in granting these exception points on transplant rates for HCC and non-HCCpatients. We used Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data and liver simulated allocation modeling software and modeled (1) a 3-month delay before granting a MELD exception score of 25, (2) a 6-month delay before granting a score of 28, and (3) a 9-month delay before granting a score of 29. Of all candidates waitlisted between January 1 and December 31, 2010 (n = 28,053), 2773 (9.9%) had an HCC MELD exception. For HCC candidates, transplant rates would be 108.7, 65.0, 44.2, and 33.6 per 100 person-years for the current policy and for 3-, 6-, and 9-month delays, respectively. Corresponding rates would be 30.1, 32.5, 33.9, and 34.8 for non-HCC candidates. CONCLUSION: A delay of 6-9 months would eliminate the geographic variability in the discrepancy between HCC and non-HCC transplant rates under current policy and may allow for more equal access to transplant for all candidates.
Authors: Richard B Freeman; Robert G Gish; Ann Harper; Gary L Davis; John Vierling; Leslie Lieblein; Goran Klintmalm; Jamie Blazek; Robert Hunter; Jeffrey Punch Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: P Sharma; A M Harper; J L Hernandez; T Heffron; D C Mulligan; R H Wiesner; V Balan Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2006-06-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Gerd Otto; Sascha Herber; Michael Heise; Ansgar W Lohse; Christian Mönch; Fernando Bittinger; Maria Hoppe-Lotichius; Marcus Schuchmann; Anja Victor; Michael Pitton Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: A B Massie; B Caffo; S E Gentry; E C Hall; D A Axelrod; K L Lentine; M A Schnitzler; A Gheorghian; P R Salvalaggio; D L Segev Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2011-09-15 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: M Bhat; M Hassanain; E Simoneau; G N Tzimas; P Chaudhury; M Deschenes; D Valenti; P Ghali; P Wong; T Cabrera; J Barkun; J I Tchervenkov; P Metrakos Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Gerd Otto; Marcus Schuchmann; Maria Hoppe-Lotichius; Michael Heise; Arndt Weinmann; Torsten Hansen; Michael P Pitton Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2013-04-12 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Mary G Bowring; Sheng Zhou; Eric K H Chow; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Sommer E Gentry Journal: Transplantation Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Tanveen Ishaque; Allan B Massie; Mary G Bowring; Christine E Haugen; Jessica M Ruck; Samantha E Halpern; Madeleine M Waldram; Macey L Henderson; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang; Andrew M Cameron; Benjamin Philosophe; Shane Ottmann; Anne F Rositch; Dorry L Segev Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Theodore H Welling; Kevin Eddinger; Kristen Carrier; Danting Zhu; Tyler Kleaveland; Derek E Moore; Douglas E Schaubel; Peter L Abt Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 5.799