Literature DB >> 23587474

How to decide about liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: size and number of lesions or response to TACE?

Gerd Otto1, Marcus Schuchmann, Maria Hoppe-Lotichius, Michael Heise, Arndt Weinmann, Torsten Hansen, Michael P Pitton.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver transplantation is a curative treatment option for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver cirrhosis. To date, patient selection for transplantation is based on size and number of nodules as assessed by imaging before listing. We hypothesized that changes in tumour features resulting from pre-transplant transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is a superior criterion to predict tumour recurrence.
METHODS: 136 patients with HCC in cirrhosis with two or more cycles of pre-transplant TACE were included in this study. According to the surgical specimens, 46 patients exceeded the Milan criteria.
RESULTS: Tumour recurrence occurred in 21 patients (15%). Classification of Milan criteria according to the imaging at referral was not predictive for recurrence (p=0.58), whereas the Milan criteria in the imaging immediately before transplantation reflected changes after pre-transplant TACE and were highly predictive (p<0.0001). Of the 99 patients constantly within Milan or downstaged to within Milan, 88% were recurrence-free after 5 years, compared to 55% of the patients exceeding the Milan criteria despite pre-transplant TACE. Five-year absence of recurrence was better predicted by the criterion "Progressive Disease" according to RECIST (p<0.0001). If progression was defined as any progression (including less than 20% of the sum of target lesions or new measurable lesions), predictability of recurrence in the receiver operating characteristic was 0.86.
CONCLUSIONS: Imprecise assessment of size and number of tumour lesions limits prognostic importance of initial imaging. Characteristics of tumour response to TACE are reliably recognized and allow identification of suitable patients for transplantation. Future selection criteria for LT in HCC should consider this aspect.
Copyright © 2013 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AP; AUC; CR; CT; HCC; LT; Liver transplantation; MC; MCin; MCout; Milan criteria; Minimal progression; NL; PD; PR; Patient selection; RECIST; ROC; Recurrence; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours; Response to TACE; SD; TACE; UICC; Union Internationale Contre le Cancer; any progression; area under the curve; complete response; computed tomography; exceeding the Milan criteria; hepatocellular carcinoma; liver transplantation; mTOR; mammalian target of rapamycin; meeting the Milan criteria; new lesions; partial response; progressive disease; receiver operator characteristic; stable disease; transarterial chemoembolisation

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23587474     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  36 in total

1.  Delayed hepatocellular carcinoma model for end-stage liver disease exception score improves disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States.

Authors:  Julie K Heimbach; Ryutaro Hirose; Peter G Stock; David P Schladt; Hui Xiong; Jiannong Liu; Kim M Olthoff; Ann Harper; Jon J Snyder; Ajay K Israni; Bertram L Kasiske; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 2.  Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: An update.

Authors:  Javier Tejeda-Maldonado; Ignacio García-Juárez; Jonathan Aguirre-Valadez; Adrián González-Aguirre; Mario Vilatobá-Chapa; Alejandra Armengol-Alonso; Francisco Escobar-Penagos; Aldo Torre; Juan Francisco Sánchez-Ávila; Diego Luis Carrillo-Pérez
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 3.  Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma biological behavior in patient selection for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Umberto Cillo; Tommaso Giuliani; Marina Polacco; Luz Maria Herrero Manley; Gino Crivellari; Alessandro Vitale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Transarterial chemoembolization and bland embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Emmanuel A Tsochatzis; Evangelia Fatourou; James O'Beirne; Tim Meyer; Andrew K Burroughs
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Twenty years of Milan criteria: the wicked flee though no one pursues.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri; Francesco Guerra; Quirino Lai
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.293

Review 6.  Bridging and downstaging therapy in patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma waiting on the list of liver transplantation.

Authors:  Wong Hoi She; Tan To Cheung
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-04-14

7.  Targeting glucose metabolism in cancer: new class of agents for loco-regional and systemic therapy of liver cancer and beyond?

Authors:  Lynn Jeanette Savic; Julius Chapiro; Gregor Duwe; Jean-François Geschwind
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2016-01-01

8.  Comparison of hepatic resection and transarterial chemoembolization for solitary hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Dong-Zhi Zhang; Xiao-Dong Wei; Xiao-Peng Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Liver transplantation for hepatobiliary malignancies: a new era of "Transplant Oncology" has begun.

Authors:  Taizo Hibi; Osamu Itano; Masahiro Shinoda; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 10.  Hepatocellular cancer and recurrence after liver transplantation: what about the impact of immunosuppression?

Authors:  Jan Lerut; Samuele Iesari; Maxime Foguenne; Quirino Lai
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-10-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.