Literature DB >> 16826556

Response to transarterial chemoembolization as a biological selection criterion for liver transplantation in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Gerd Otto1, Sascha Herber, Michael Heise, Ansgar W Lohse, Christian Mönch, Fernando Bittinger, Maria Hoppe-Lotichius, Marcus Schuchmann, Anja Victor, Michael Pitton.   

Abstract

Criteria to select patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation (LT) are based on tumor size and number of nodules rather than on tumor biology. The present study was undertaken to assess the role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in selecting patients with tumors suitable for LT. Ninety-six consecutive patients with HCC were treated by repeatedly performed TACE, 62 of them exceeding the Milan criteria. Patients meeting the Milan criteria were immediately listed, and patients beyond the listing criteria were listed upon downstaging of the tumor following successful TACE. Fifty patients were finally transplanted. Of these 50 patients, 34 exceeded the Milan criteria. In these 96 patients, overall 5-year survival was 51.9%. However, it was 80.9% for patients undergoing LT and 0% for patients without transplantation (P < 0.0001). Tumor recurrence was primarily influenced by the control of the disease through continued TACE during the waiting time. Freedom from recurrence after 5 years was 94.5% in patients (n = 39) with progress-free TACE during the waiting time. Tumor recurrence was significantly higher in patients (n = 11) who after initial response to TACE progressed again before LT (freedom from recurrence 35.4%; P = 0.0017). Progress-free course of TACE during the waiting time (P = 0.006; risk ratio, 8.95), and a limited number of tumor nodules as assessed in the surgical specimen (P = 0.025; risk ratio, 0.116) proved to be significant predictors for freedom from recurrence in the multivariate analysis. Milan criteria were without impact on recurrence. Our data suggest that sustained response to TACE is a better selection criterion for LT than the initial assessment of tumor size or number. (c) 2006 AASLD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16826556     DOI: 10.1002/lt.20837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  100 in total

1.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: strategies to avoid tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Marco Vivarelli; Andrea Risaliti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Liver Resection and Transplantation for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Milan Criteria.

Authors:  Victor M Zaydfudim; Neeta Vachharajani; Goran B Klintmalm; William R Jarnagin; Alan W Hemming; Maria B Majella Doyle; Keith M Cavaness; William C Chapman; David M Nagorney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Increasing disparity in waitlist mortality rates with increased model for end-stage liver disease scores for candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma versus candidates without hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Benjamin French; Peter Abt; Sandy Feng; Andrew M Cameron
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Current status of therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Kathleen E Corey; Daniel S Pratt
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.409

5.  Hepatocellular carcinoma: review of current treatment with a focus on targeted molecular therapies.

Authors:  Sonja K Olsen; Robert S Brown; Abby B Siegel
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.409

6.  Clinical validity of Metroticket calculator in transplant patients undergoing prior chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyung-Don Kim; Gi-Won Song; Ju Hyun Shim; Seungbong Han; Jihyun An; Deok-Bog Moon; Kang Mo Kim; Young-Suk Lim; Gi-Young Ko; Shin Hwang; Han Chu Lee; Eunsil Yu; Kyu-Bo Sung; Sung-Gyu Lee
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.047

7.  Proposal of new expanded selection criteria using total tumor size and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose - positron emission tomography/computed tomography for living donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: The National Cancer Center Korea criteria.

Authors:  Seung Duk Lee; Bora Lee; Seong Hoon Kim; Jungnam Joo; Seok-Ki Kim; Young-Kyu Kim; Sang-Jae Park
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

Review 8.  Loco-regional therapies for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma awaiting liver transplantation: Selecting an optimal therapy.

Authors:  Thomas J Byrne; Jorge Rakela
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

9.  Delayed hepatocellular carcinoma model for end-stage liver disease exception score improves disparity in access to liver transplant in the United States.

Authors:  Julie K Heimbach; Ryutaro Hirose; Peter G Stock; David P Schladt; Hui Xiong; Jiannong Liu; Kim M Olthoff; Ann Harper; Jon J Snyder; Ajay K Israni; Bertram L Kasiske; W Ray Kim
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 17.425

Review 10.  Bridging and downstaging treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients on the waiting list for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Maurizio Pompili; Giampiero Francica; Francesca Romana Ponziani; Roberto Iezzi; Alfonso Wolfango Avolio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.